new way to classify storms

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
docjoe
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:42 pm
Location: SE Alabama..formerly the land of ivan and dennis

new way to classify storms

#1 Postby docjoe » Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:58 pm

Based on my recent experience with Ivan, Arlene, Cindy, and Dennis I would like to propose a new way, a more practical way, to classify how severe a storm is. This is not based on wind speed, millibars, storm surge etc. Rather this is based on my being sick and tired of cutting and hauling trees. Storms should be ranked in a given area on amount of debris produced using a highly sophisticated method of eyeballing your debris pile. I recommend giving a level to each 1500 cubic feet of debris. An example ( and this only includes the 40 + trees I lost in Ivan and Dennis, plus the ones from my neighbors on one side.and the debris from the creek flooding 6 feet high in my yard but not my roof) would be as follows. In Ivan I conservatively made 5 debris piles averaging about 75 feet long, 8 feet wide and 8 feet high(75*8*8*5)/1500=16. Thus Ivan for me was a Cat 16. My neighbor who had no trees and no roof damage did not even meet criteria for a Cat 1. I estimate Dennis will be a cat 9.6. Hopefully those of you with more experience than me can find a way to factor in roof debris, wet carpet, etc. Any thoughts??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#2 Postby The Big Dog » Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 pm

How about "number of TV mets I'd like to punch."
0 likes   

User avatar
EDR1222
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1253
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

Re: new way to classify storms

#3 Postby EDR1222 » Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:21 pm

docjoe wrote:Based on my recent experience with Ivan, Arlene, Cindy, and Dennis I would like to propose a new way, a more practical way, to classify how severe a storm is. This is not based on wind speed, millibars, storm surge etc. Rather this is based on my being sick and tired of cutting and hauling trees. Storms should be ranked in a given area on amount of debris produced using a highly sophisticated method of eyeballing your debris pile. I recommend giving a level to each 1500 cubic feet of debris. An example ( and this only includes the 40 + trees I lost in Ivan and Dennis, plus the ones from my neighbors on one side.and the debris from the creek flooding 6 feet high in my yard but not my roof) would be as follows. In Ivan I conservatively made 5 debris piles averaging about 75 feet long, 8 feet wide and 8 feet high(75*8*8*5)/1500=16. Thus Ivan for me was a Cat 16. My neighbor who had no trees and no roof damage did not even meet criteria for a Cat 1. I estimate Dennis will be a cat 9.6. Hopefully those of you with more experience than me can find a way to factor in roof debris, wet carpet, etc. Any thoughts??? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Not a bad idea. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#4 Postby WindRunner » Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:57 am

I was just thinking about putting something like this up here, except it was going to be a serious discussion about a new scale based on pressure or size or something, I hadn't really though about it much.
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#5 Postby Astro_man92 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:35 pm

which whould be more intense a small compact cat 3 or a large cat 2 ???
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#6 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:07 pm

Astro_man92 wrote:which whould be more intense a small compact cat 3 or a large cat 2 ???


Depends on how fast they're moving. And there is a difference between an Ivan-isque Cat 3 and an 1993 Emily-isque Cat 3. And where they make landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7404
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#7 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:24 pm

I guess it depends on the area and size of the storm
0 likes   

sprink52
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 1:25 pm
Location: Royal Palm Beach, Fl

#8 Postby sprink52 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:24 pm

I have to say for me,Frances was worse than Andrew. I went through Andrew in Homestead in '92. He was a small,compact bomb. Andrew was over for us in 4 hours. The impact was confined to south Dade County. Andrew had a hurricane force wind field of about 40 miles and moved very quickly.

Frances on the other hand had a huge wind field, about 100+ miles and took 36 hours to move through. Those of us here in North Palm Beach County and the Treasure Coast got beat up with hurricane force winds for 36 hours!! Hey folks, thats a day and a half!! Talk about cabin fever.
:yayaya:

Give me a fast moving storm over a Frances any day.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#9 Postby Frank2 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:28 pm

I think FEMA uses something similar (severity based on amount of actual debris).

Frank
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#10 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:29 pm

same here with ivan, ivan stayed all night, dennis only took about an hour and was done
0 likes   

Scorpion

#11 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:36 pm

Yes, Frances was definitely a pain. Its damage was far more widespread and worse than Jeanne just because the prolonged amount of hurricane force winds(even though here I think we only got hurricane winds for an hour or so, and I doubt that south of West Palm any hurricane force winds were experienced). Even hours and hours of strong TS winds can cause damage. Would take a weakening fast 3 any day than Frances.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests