This season is dead!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

Re: This season is dead!

#21 Postby CajunMama » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:25 pm

southerngale wrote:Image





I just figured I'd post it before someone else did. Have a safe season, everyone! It's far from over.



Not much going on at 3 am, eh frack? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#22 Postby dhweather » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:26 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:********NOT A REAL FORECAST...JUST A JOKE*********

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico...

The National Hurricane Center is issuing advisories on two puny storms that are undeserving of respect...Tropical Depression Irene...which has officially now been declared dead...and Tropical Storm Harvey...which also has been declared dead by us.

All areas of the Atlantic now have only 70 degree water...40 kt of shear...and is now blanketed by dry MJO and Saharan air. Upper level lows that are covering the Atlantic are not expected to develop.

Elsewhere...tropical storm formation is not expected through June 2006.



:lol:

That's about how it feels!
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#23 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:26 pm

But seriously, the tendency for an active early season to be followed by a slow late season could be evolving here.

Maybe Irene and Harvey were the last spurts of the early season outbreak and a slow August is finally setting up?
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#24 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:51 pm

guys guys guys relax. there is a moment of inactivity and already you guys are declaring this an indication of a quiet remainder of August? Come on the past 4-5 seasons have all had a sort of this. Remember 1998? Bonnie didnt form until August 20th and the month ended up with 4 named storms? Relax we got a loooong way to go. lol

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#25 Postby george_r_1961 » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:51 pm

Kelly ya goof :lol:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#26 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:06 pm

if it ends at 19/4/2, the season will be remembered as below average due to the lack of canes
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#27 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:08 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:if it ends at 19/4/2, the season will be remembered as below average due to the lack of canes


I never thought of it that way.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

wxcrazytwo

#28 Postby wxcrazytwo » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:10 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:if it ends at 19/4/2, the season will be remembered as below average due to the lack of canes


How do you figure, if the average is less than that. If it falls slightly below the prediction it is still above average, because remember they are just predictions. We have to look at the yearly averages. Still above at the end..
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#29 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:22 pm

I take NOAA's predictions with a grain of salt, but do you know that they have a ZERO PERCENT for the season to be below average. And that probably also means for the amounts of hurricanes and Majors. Now you don't think that NOAA would be that wrong, would you? (Hey, they should've put at least 1% then again :lol: ) If you say average NOAA has a 5% for that so I won't be surprised for that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#30 Postby Trader Ron » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:36 pm

As of Saturday 8-13, last year will be worse than 2005.....so far. Forty Billion in damage for 2004 vs ????? for 2005.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#31 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:43 pm

Trader Ron wrote:As of Saturday 8-13, last year will be worse than 2005.....so far. Forty Billion in damage for 2004 vs ????? for 2005.


what do you mean? As of 8/13 last year Charley was in the process of making landfall and no other ones did anything perhaps Alex did.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#32 Postby Trader Ron » Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:55 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:As of Saturday 8-13, last year will be worse than 2005.....so far. Forty Billion in damage for 2004 vs ????? for 2005.


what do you mean? As of 8/13 last year Charley was in the process of making landfall and no other ones did anything perhaps Alex did.

<RICKY>


How much damage did Charley do vs Dennis and Emily? I believe quite a bit more.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#33 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:00 pm

Trader Ron wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:As of Saturday 8-13, last year will be worse than 2005.....so far. Forty Billion in damage for 2004 vs ????? for 2005.


what do you mean? As of 8/13 last year Charley was in the process of making landfall and no other ones did anything perhaps Alex did.

<RICKY>


How much damage did Charley do vs Dennis and Emily? I believe quite a bit more.


Emily made landfall twice in Mexico and we will never know the true damage amounts there because the data isnt there. So its inconclusive.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#34 Postby Astro_man92 » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:06 pm

we are almost above the yearly average so I don't think this season will be declared as below average but a dud :lol:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#35 Postby Trader Ron » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:08 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:As of Saturday 8-13, last year will be worse than 2005.....so far. Forty Billion in damage for 2004 vs ????? for 2005.


what do you mean? As of 8/13 last year Charley was in the process of making landfall and no other ones did anything perhaps Alex did.

<RICKY>


How much damage did Charley do vs Dennis and Emily? I believe quite a bit more.


Emily made landfall twice in Mexico and we will never know the true damage amounts there because the data isnt there. So its inconclusive.

<RICKY>


Charley did $14 Billion worth of damage in the CONUS. I doubt Emily was as bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#36 Postby Astro_man92 » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:09 pm

Trader Ron wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:As of Saturday 8-13, last year will be worse than 2005.....so far. Forty Billion in damage for 2004 vs ????? for 2005.


what do you mean? As of 8/13 last year Charley was in the process of making landfall and no other ones did anything perhaps Alex did.

<RICKY>


How much damage did Charley do vs Dennis and Emily? I believe quite a bit more.


Emily made landfall twice in Mexico and we will never know the true damage amounts there because the data isnt there. So its inconclusive.

<RICKY>


Charley did $14 Billion worth of damage in the CONUS. I doubt Emily was as bad.


it wasn't as bad damage wise because it didn't hit as densly populated of an area
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#37 Postby Swimdude » Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:47 pm

I knew by the person who made the thread that it was a joke. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
EDR1222
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1253
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

#38 Postby EDR1222 » Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:50 pm

As others have said on this thread, it is still early.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#39 Postby f5 » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:44 pm

Image

sorry couldn't resist
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#40 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:48 pm

weird...
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CourierPR and 51 guests