TS Irene=Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
superfly

#981 Postby superfly » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:08 pm

I don't think Irene has looked any worse than right now. Even when it was a naked swirl, the LLC was strong. The LLC is very weak right now if there at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#982 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:09 pm

i agree...
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#983 Postby CronkPSU » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:10 pm

damn bipolar storm, make up your mind
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#984 Postby fci » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:10 pm

Thunder44 wrote:
gkrangers wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:NastyCat4- I don't think DT's intention was to replay Andrew for shock value. He sincerely believes what he is forecasting, and he's a very good meteorologist. I understand your point about sensationalism, but I do not believe that DT is using this as a motive in his forecasting.

Yes, DT does not use sensationalism in his forecasting. Nastycat4 is very new obviously by his/her number of posts, so this person doesn't know that.

DT can be a little crude in his language, but hyping is something he has NEVER done. All of his forecasts that I've seen have been based on have been backed by logical data from models and other sources.


I seem to remember some blizzards he has hyped in the past several years for the northeast that never happened. Of course it seems that everybody else has forgotten that. :roll:
OMG you mean a meteorologist was WRONG?!?!?!

STOP THE PRESSES!

Since when are they perfect ?

A lot of the stuff DT posts is pure speculation. Not actual real life forecasts. And that is what boards like S2K and Eastern are for. Weather lovers to discuss all the possibilities...


If it's just speculation rather than actual forecasts he's making than he shouldn't get any credit for it. A common complaint I hear about JB, that doesn't seem to apply to DT.



BTW, what is JB saying about the system?
0 likes   

gkrangers

#985 Postby gkrangers » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:11 pm

I've been a staunch Irene supporter thus far...but right now I'm really questioning its survival for the first time..
0 likes   

Scorpion

#986 Postby Scorpion » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:12 pm

Irene is fine.. she'll be better in a few hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#987 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:13 pm

Astro_man92 wrote:
Astro_man92 wrote:
BensonTCwatcher wrote:I think we had better wait until Irene gets under the anticyclone are tomorrow sometime (provided the speed stays the same) to declare her weak, pitiful, ragged, or other such classifications. She has a track record of living to fight another day. The dry air is still there but the moisture envelope will improve soon and so should the convection.


You have a point there. If you look at the water vapor loop it looks like Irene is struggleing right now :( :eek: If it makes it through the dry air I think it is going to have to do battle with a ULL :( I don't think is going ot make it to the coast once it hits that ULL I think it is done for. Unless the ULL just pushes it off or misses Irene entierly. You can't really see the battle in the visible loop as well

is there even a ULL there or is just a stay low???(the circulation near the coast)


Looks like it's at the 200mb level. I'm not sure it will be close enough to do battle when/if Irenen gets there. Probably provide shear or worse ventilate it.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#988 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:13 pm

man, we need to throw a party for her...lol..she is def.. a primetime fighter
0 likes   

NorthGaWeather

#989 Postby NorthGaWeather » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:13 pm

NastyCat4 wrote:Speculating on a major when recurvature is still the most likely option is sensationalism. The NHC has noted the West movement, but still tends to go with the CONU senario of recurvature, not a major into the Southeast Coast. If the movement is more Westerly, it is probably temporary.


Who said it was the most likely option? Its clearly your opinion. How about you back it up with synoptic and model evidence.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#990 Postby fci » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:13 pm

skysummit wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
NastyCat4 wrote:Speculating on a major when recurvature is still the most likely option is sensationalism. The NHC has noted the West movement, but still tends to go with the CONU senario of recurvature, not a major into the Southeast Coast. If the movement is more Westerly, it is probably temporary.

The track NO LONGER indicates a recurvature, it shows a general WNW motion. Are you paying attention? Must not be...

Image
Do you see it turning MORE WEST at the end of the forecast. Doesn't look like a recurvature scenario to me.

Of course NHC is hedging though, lol. :roll:

Recurvature is still possible, but becoming less likely.


Plus, look at the Sunday cone of error. The southern most tip of the cone is pretty much the same latitude she is now. I believe this W - WNW motion will continue for the next 5 days at least.


What is the basis fro the NW movement then a turn to the W?
Seems like it is simply headed W now and has been for a while.
Continuity??
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#991 Postby clfenwi » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:14 pm

CronkPSU wrote:geez, what the heck is the gfdl doing in the 00z run? looks like it has it headed almost NNW for the next 24 hours???


gkrangers has already answered your first question.

As far as the second goes, refer to the text guidance (that I posted a page or two back but here's the link it is in case you missed it : http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... s/05080923

It started Irene on a 270 course, with a turn to a WNW/NW course following for most of the near term. It isn't until 66 hours or so that the course goes NNW. So the intial course is not as as sharp to the north as the graphic makes it appear.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#992 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:15 pm

I tell you what...and this has been my whole thing on all of my forecast tracks....i have been left of the guidance ever since we started...my big reason is because she is just not strenghening...and until i see a true WNW path..im not budging...
0 likes   

gkrangers

#993 Postby gkrangers » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:16 pm

Heres a good one.

GFDL keeps Irene alive for over 100 hours for the first time, and Irene is really really really looking sick right now...
0 likes   

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

#994 Postby shaggy » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:18 pm

latest GFDL also takes it to 87 knots for awhile before a sharp left trun and weakening phase going to be interesting from N Ga to NE but only time will tell
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#995 Postby clfenwi » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:24 pm

deltadog03 wrote:I tell you what...and this has been my whole thing on all of my forecast tracks....i have been left of the guidance ever since we started...my big reason is because she is just not strenghening...and until i see a true WNW path..im not budging...


That's pretty much the way I was with Emily. She rolled due west for days but most of the models wanted to take her wnw right off the start. So, I went with the models that weren't doing that.

Nailed the first landfall point, was too far south on the second.

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 211#953211
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#996 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:26 pm

clfenwi wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:I tell you what...and this has been my whole thing on all of my forecast tracks....i have been left of the guidance ever since we started...my big reason is because she is just not strenghening...and until i see a true WNW path..im not budging...


That's pretty much the way I was with Emily. She rolled due west for days but most of the models wanted to take her wnw right off the start. So, I went with the models that weren't doing that.

Nailed the first landfall point, was too far south on the second.

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 211#953211


so, does your instinct tell you more westward?? im just thinking i don't see that changing right now...do you? and thanks for that info
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#997 Postby WeatherEmperor » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:27 pm

deltadog03 wrote:I tell you what...and this has been my whole thing on all of my forecast tracks....i have been left of the guidance ever since we started...my big reason is because she is just not strenghening...and until i see a true WNW path..im not budging...


you know what? I agree with you. The models have been continuosly developing Irene while it hasnt which is responsible for its more westerly track versus most of the models's wnw track.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#998 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:29 pm

I think it's safe to say the ridge in place, in fact that is an understatement

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm5.html

Also the steering is still low level (again) the GFDL looks plausible to me. but I can't reconcile the movement of the ridge and then the W movement. http://bricker.met.psu.edu/~arnottj/cgi-bin/gfdltc2.cgi?time=2005080918-irene09l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
Last edited by BensonTCwatcher on Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#999 Postby clfenwi » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:31 pm

ncdowneast wrote:latest GFDL also takes it to 87 knots for awhile before a sharp left trun and weakening phase going to be interesting from N Ga to NE but only time will tell


1. 87 knots is the forecast 925 millibar wind, so a 15-25% deduction has to be applied.

2. The 00Z forecast 925 mb wind was 58.6 kts...even with the max deduction that comes down to 44 knots... way too high... (though it does have a downward fluctuation up and down after that, so some of the forecasts could verify).
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#1000 Postby WeatherEmperor » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:34 pm

wow that is one monster ridge. what do you think that means for Irene?

<RICKY>
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12, Cpv17, gib, Hurricane2022, Hurrilurker, jgh, MONTEGUT_LA, ouragans, Pelicane, South Texas Storms, Stratton23, Ulf and 101 guests