ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145438
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3101 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:58 pm

Reposted from main thread by wxman57 about models at 00z.This is the real thread for this. :)

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaFl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1904
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3102 Postby TampaFl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:59 pm

800pm position: hugging the coastline


Image
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38092
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3103 Postby Brent » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:02 pm

jinftl wrote:The northern coast of the Yucatan really needs to keep and eye on this trend.


It's pulling WNW now. It's not going there.

In fact if it keeps up this track(big if), it will hit Texas near where Dolly hit
0 likes   

User avatar
RBDnhm
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3104 Postby RBDnhm » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:12 pm

Rita was the reverse of this trend. See http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/RI ... hics.shtml


PTPatrick wrote:At this time frame(about 4.5 5 days) NHC had Rita pointed at Brownsville as did most models. Even the 3 day forecast before landfall was near matagorda Bay. Point is...we know how easy it is this time of year for a storm to get picked up right at the Texas coast and pulled north or north east. I wouldnt put any stock into a landfall south of Houston just yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
Shawee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:14 am
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3105 Postby Shawee » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:27 pm

RBDnhm wrote:Rita was the reverse of this trend. See http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/RI ... hics.shtml


PTPatrick wrote:At this time frame(about 4.5 5 days) NHC had Rita pointed at Brownsville as did most models. Even the 3 day forecast before landfall was near matagorda Bay. Point is...we know how easy it is this time of year for a storm to get picked up right at the Texas coast and pulled north or north east. I wouldnt put any stock into a landfall south of Houston just yet.


Did Ed re-resister under a different name??? just kidding PTP. Seriously, I agree with you and am not taking my gustov window boards down of another few days at least. I have a lot of faith in the NHC, but the recent discussion on shifting land falls should tell everyone not to let their guard down just yet, especially east of the current "consensus".

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, and still hope old Ike gets shredded and Cape Verde can watch his football game in peace! Tiger Stadium is still out of commission.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3106 Postby PTPatrick » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:46 pm

Not sure who Ed is, but hey I am chill with whateva...just glad it aint heading to Mississippi no more. I am aware the trend with Rita was the opposite of this. But I just aint buying Brownsville yet. Just like a storm approaching FL from the Southeast, a few hours, a slow down here, a speed up there, a front 6 hours too soon can mean the difference between bye bye Miami and the "what was that storm that recurved just before hitting florida" conversations years later. I Still think this will slow to a crawl in the GOM, and then basically play havoc with the models and ultimately come to a landfall somewhere between Matagorda Bay and Vermillion Bay. Be that as it may I would just as soon have it hit Kennedy County. I just dont think it will happen. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3107 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:53 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Shawee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:14 am
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3108 Postby Shawee » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:56 pm

PTPatrick wrote:Not sure who Ed is, but hey I am chill with whateva...just glad it aint heading to Mississippi no more. I am aware the trend with Rita was the opposite of this. But I just aint buying Brownsville yet. Just like a storm approaching FL from the Southeast, a few hours, a slow down here, a speed up there, a front 6 hours too soon can mean the difference between bye bye Miami and the "what was that storm that recurved just before hitting florida" conversations years later. I Still think this will slow to a crawl in the GOM, and then basically play havoc with the models and ultimately come to a landfall somewhere between Matagorda Bay and Vermillion Bay. Be that as it may I would just as soon have it hit Kennedy County. I just dont think it will happen. :)



Ed Mahmoud, the infamous caller of "no more Texas Storms this year"... funny that we all get on him a bit, but he may still prove himself afterall? We had several of those type storms one here in New Orleans, Dean and Ivan most recently... though they didn't veer out to sea, they were VERY quickly forgotten in N.O. unfortunately.

all in good fun, Ed. That is what keep this board interesting.
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3109 Postby TTheriot1975 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:57 pm

ok deltadog..what are your thoughts..still SWLA? i think the models are too far south myself
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3110 Postby jasons2k » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:57 pm

deltadog03 wrote:Image


Thank you, thank you! Yes, that is what will keep Ike from Mexico and South Texas IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3111 Postby Sabanic » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:06 pm

jasons wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:Image


Thank you, thank you! Yes, that is what will keep Ike from Mexico and South Texas IMO.


Okay dumb question jason, but that is the trough that may cause Ike to turn more northward prior to the TX coast right?
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3112 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:07 pm

jasons wrote:
Thank you, thank you! Yes, that is what will keep Ike from Mexico and South Texas IMO.


Ike may outrun that trough
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3113 Postby gboudx » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:09 pm

Sabanic wrote:
jasons wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:Image


Thank you, thank you! Yes, that is what will keep Ike from Mexico and South Texas IMO.


Okay dumb question jason, but that is the trough that may cause Ike to turn more northward prior to the TX coast right?


Prior? After? Depends on timing. DFW NWS mentioned this trough being a player later this weekend, which would suggest "after" landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3114 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:09 pm

Yes, that trof/area should be the one to turn it if he does...
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3115 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:12 pm

Why are you "thank you, thank you"....?
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3116 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:28 pm

18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.


I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.


Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3117 Postby Sabanic » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:30 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.


I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.


Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?


You're a nut Ed, but gotta say I love it
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3118 Postby Portastorm » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:31 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.


I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.


Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?


Ed, your tenacity is admirable! And I do love that sense of humor. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3119 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:32 pm

NHC way north of guidance at the moment. I'm smelling Mexico or extreme South Texas with Ike maybe...

Image
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3120 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:33 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.


I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.


Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?



Nothing wrong with hanging on to what you believe but eventually you have to let go. :D
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests