

Moderator: S2k Moderators
jinftl wrote:The northern coast of the Yucatan really needs to keep and eye on this trend.
PTPatrick wrote:At this time frame(about 4.5 5 days) NHC had Rita pointed at Brownsville as did most models. Even the 3 day forecast before landfall was near matagorda Bay. Point is...we know how easy it is this time of year for a storm to get picked up right at the Texas coast and pulled north or north east. I wouldnt put any stock into a landfall south of Houston just yet.
RBDnhm wrote:Rita was the reverse of this trend. See http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/RI ... hics.shtmlPTPatrick wrote:At this time frame(about 4.5 5 days) NHC had Rita pointed at Brownsville as did most models. Even the 3 day forecast before landfall was near matagorda Bay. Point is...we know how easy it is this time of year for a storm to get picked up right at the Texas coast and pulled north or north east. I wouldnt put any stock into a landfall south of Houston just yet.
PTPatrick wrote:Not sure who Ed is, but hey I am chill with whateva...just glad it aint heading to Mississippi no more. I am aware the trend with Rita was the opposite of this. But I just aint buying Brownsville yet. Just like a storm approaching FL from the Southeast, a few hours, a slow down here, a speed up there, a front 6 hours too soon can mean the difference between bye bye Miami and the "what was that storm that recurved just before hitting florida" conversations years later. I Still think this will slow to a crawl in the GOM, and then basically play havoc with the models and ultimately come to a landfall somewhere between Matagorda Bay and Vermillion Bay. Be that as it may I would just as soon have it hit Kennedy County. I just dont think it will happen.
jasons wrote:
Thank you, thank you! Yes, that is what will keep Ike from Mexico and South Texas IMO.
Ed Mahmoud wrote:18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.
I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.
Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?
Ed Mahmoud wrote:18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.
I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.
Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?
Ed Mahmoud wrote:18Z DGEX, which nobody ever uses for tropical cyclones, shows landfall Saturday near Port Lavaca.
I still have, IMHO, a 50/50 chance that Texas is spared, either by a continued bend Southward of the models, or the trough moving into the Pac NW having been underestimated, and hooking Ike back to Louisiana or points East.
Was it over when the Germans bombed the Alamo?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests