NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
Tekken_Guy
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:08 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
4 likes
-
Hurricane Mike
- Category 2

- Posts: 675
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Video Update on Melissa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAO4n3wryfE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAO4n3wryfE
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
It appears that the southerly jog has stopped, and wobbling the other direction now.


Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
-
Sciencerocks
- Category 5

- Posts: 10180
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
If the wind can catch up to appearance. I think it is possible. We'll probably wake up at 8am est to its peak! Haf-a and b suggest that this thing may become 150-155 knots tomarrow and up to landfall on Jamaica. We will see.
4 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
The northwest section of the storm seems to continuously be the weakest or most unstable, I wonder why that is?
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
Goalposts, Atlantic and worldwide in 2025:
- Humberto: 140 kt, 924 mb
- Errol (Australian region, JTWC): 140 kt, 919 mb
- Erin: 140 kt, 915 mb
- Ragasa (JTWC): 145 kt, 910 mb
- Ragasa (JMA): 905 mb (10-min wind 110 kt)
Sub-905 to surpass Ragasa can be a stretch, though Melissa still has a fair chance to succeed.
5 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.
A few differences from Melissa, however:
- Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
- Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
- Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.
Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
4 likes
-
Sciencerocks
- Category 5

- Posts: 10180
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Woofde wrote:If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.
A few differences from Melissa, however:
- Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
- Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
- Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.
Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
Sometimes it takes time for the wind to catch up with the appearance. This impressive satellite structure with the lightening within the eye wall suggest that the wind will be forced closer to the surface.
2 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
3 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Working all afternoon & evening with hardly a chance to catch up with the days recon data, Discussion updates and satellite analysis has been torturous, but from what I'm seeing might be perfect timing to sit back and watch. I know a number of you guys have already expressed this but..... right here - right now, there is no way that Melissa is not a Cat 5. Where's the Air Force plane? I'll eat my underwear if I'm wrong 
4 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Jamaica radar loop update. Back to a North of due west jog here.


Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is.Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.
But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities.
I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.
It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.
That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
6 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I think recon may find ~140 kt winds and ~925 mb mslp.
https://x.com/VortixWx/status/1982656134260678930
https://x.com/weathertrackus/status/1982655896422424787
https://x.com/VortixWx/status/1982656134260678930
https://x.com/weathertrackus/status/1982655896422424787
Last edited by Hurricane2022 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
FYI, the AF recon schedule has a fix time of 0530z (1:30 am EDT), and an exit time 3 hours later.
1 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
-
IsabelaWeather
- Category 1

- Posts: 316
- Age: 36
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:29 am
- Location: Isabela, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Jr0d wrote:Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is.Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.
But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities.
I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.
It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.
That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
I believe its the height of the tropopause which is why storms like katrina look weak when compared to (generally) WPAC C5s
I also think people are discounting the fact that the atmosphere is cooling now that its well into the night. If it were borderline -80C then the cooling could push it to the new satellite coloring.
2 likes
Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
It certainly does feel that way with Eta/Iota being very strong examples in recent memory. Wilma would be the counter point I suppose though; it was at a similar lattitude as Melissa is now during it's historic run.Jr0d wrote:Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is.Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.
But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities.
I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.
It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.
That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
7 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 5121
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I'll throw out a guess for recon first pass: 130kts/929mb, appearance suggests stronger but that hasn't happened yet, that could always change of course
Last edited by ElectricStorm on Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
We've hit adjusted T# 8.3 and CI 7.7 on ADT, which I believe surpasses Milton's peak raw T# of 8.0 (and matches its peak CI of 7.7).
Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.7 8.3 8.3
7.7 8.3 8.3
6 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
0 likes
Storm Track: Erin '95, Opal '95, Danny '97, Georges '98, Ivan '04, Dennis '05
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
https://x.com/MichaelRLowry/status/1982662476874326459
https://x.com/FlynnJansenWX/status/1982658253810176143
https://x.com/FlynnJansenWX/status/1982658253810176143
2 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests





Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.


