NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Tekken_Guy
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:08 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1161 Postby Tekken_Guy » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:30 pm

Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
4 likes   

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 675
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1162 Postby Hurricane Mike » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:30 pm

0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2566
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1163 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:33 pm

It appears that the southerly jog has stopped, and wobbling the other direction now.
Image
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10180
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1164 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:36 pm

Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?



If the wind can catch up to appearance. I think it is possible. We'll probably wake up at 8am est to its peak! Haf-a and b suggest that this thing may become 150-155 knots tomarrow and up to landfall on Jamaica. We will see.
4 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1165 Postby Fancy1002 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:39 pm

The northwest section of the storm seems to continuously be the weakest or most unstable, I wonder why that is?
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1166 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:40 pm

Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?

Goalposts, Atlantic and worldwide in 2025:

  • Humberto: 140 kt, 924 mb
  • Errol (Australian region, JTWC): 140 kt, 919 mb
  • Erin: 140 kt, 915 mb
  • Ragasa (JTWC): 145 kt, 910 mb
  • Ragasa (JMA): 905 mb (10-min wind 110 kt)
For the strongest of the Atlantic season, Melissa just needs to get to 145 kt (beyond "minimum Cat 5") to top Erin in wind speed. Pressure lower than 915 mb will be harder, but HAFS-A and HAFS-B do show this happening -- if not now, there's an arguably better chance just before Jamaica landfall.

Sub-905 to surpass Ragasa can be a stretch, though Melissa still has a fair chance to succeed.
5 likes   

User avatar
Woofde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:33 am

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1167 Postby Woofde » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:41 pm

Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.

A few differences from Melissa, however:
  • Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
  • Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
  • Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.

Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.
4 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10180
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1168 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:51 pm

Woofde wrote:
Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.

A few differences from Melissa, however:
  • Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
  • Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
  • Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.

Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.



Sometimes it takes time for the wind to catch up with the appearance. This impressive satellite structure with the lightening within the eye wall suggest that the wind will be forced closer to the surface.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1169 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:51 pm

3 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5760
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1170 Postby chaser1 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:55 pm

Working all afternoon & evening with hardly a chance to catch up with the days recon data, Discussion updates and satellite analysis has been torturous, but from what I'm seeing might be perfect timing to sit back and watch. I know a number of you guys have already expressed this but..... right here - right now, there is no way that Melissa is not a Cat 5. Where's the Air Force plane? I'll eat my underwear if I'm wrong :ggreen:
4 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2566
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1171 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:57 pm

Jamaica radar loop update. Back to a North of due west jog here.

Image
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1172 Postby Jr0d » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:58 pm

Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is. :spam: Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.

But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities. ;)


I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.

It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.

That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
6 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1173 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:00 pm

Last edited by Hurricane2022 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1174 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:00 pm

FYI, the AF recon schedule has a fix time of 0530z (1:30 am EDT), and an exit time 3 hours later.
1 likes   

IsabelaWeather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 316
Age: 36
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:29 am
Location: Isabela, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1175 Postby IsabelaWeather » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:02 pm

Jr0d wrote:
Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is. :spam: Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.

But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities. ;)


I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.

It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.

That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.


I believe its the height of the tropopause which is why storms like katrina look weak when compared to (generally) WPAC C5s

I also think people are discounting the fact that the atmosphere is cooling now that its well into the night. If it were borderline -80C then the cooling could push it to the new satellite coloring.
2 likes   

User avatar
Woofde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:33 am

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1176 Postby Woofde » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:04 pm

Jr0d wrote:
Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is. :spam: Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.

But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities. ;)


I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.

It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.

That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
It certainly does feel that way with Eta/Iota being very strong examples in recent memory. Wilma would be the counter point I suppose though; it was at a similar lattitude as Melissa is now during it's historic run.
7 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5121
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1177 Postby ElectricStorm » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:13 pm

I'll throw out a guess for recon first pass: 130kts/929mb, appearance suggests stronger but that hasn't happened yet, that could always change of course
Last edited by ElectricStorm on Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

User avatar
sasha_B
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 289
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1178 Postby sasha_B » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:13 pm

We've hit adjusted T# 8.3 and CI 7.7 on ADT, which I believe surpasses Milton's peak raw T# of 8.0 (and matches its peak CI of 7.7).

Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.7 8.3 8.3
6 likes   

User avatar
Jonny
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 82
Age: 37
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: FL Panhandle

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1179 Postby Jonny » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:16 pm

0 likes   
Storm Track: Erin '95, Opal '95, Danny '97, Georges '98, Ivan '04, Dennis '05

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1180 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 11:17 pm

2 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests