8.0 and it doesn't seem far fetched. It looks like a solid 8.0 right now. Just wow
NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- eastcoastFL
- Category 5

- Posts: 3972
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Palm City, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
8.0 and it doesn't seem far fetched. It looks like a solid 8.0 right now. Just wow
5 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ADT Raw T# has hit 8.0 with the recent convective blowup, and the CI# is up to 7.4/152kt, despite actual intensity likely steady around 125kt. I'd also assess Dvorak intensity subjectively at T7.5/155kts from the CMG ring being >0.5 deg latitude, and this assessment is probably 30kts too high. It's an incredible discrepancy even given the late season tropopause height.
----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 27 OCT 2025 Time : 024021 UTC
Lat : 16:15:00 N Lon : 77:26:59 W
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.4 / 908.3mb/152.0kt
Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.4 8.0 8.0
Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 16 km
Center Temp : +19.1C Cloud Region Temp : -78.5C
Date : 27 OCT 2025 Time : 024021 UTC
Lat : 16:15:00 N Lon : 77:26:59 W
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.4 / 908.3mb/152.0kt
Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.4 8.0 8.0
Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 16 km
Center Temp : +19.1C Cloud Region Temp : -78.5C
3 likes
-
Sciencerocks
- Category 5

- Posts: 10055
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is.
Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.
But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities.
Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities.
8 likes
- FLpanhandle91
- Category 5

- Posts: 1036
- Age: 34
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Best looking Cat 4 I have to say
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148154
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
2 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.
A few differences from Melissa, however:
Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
A few differences from Melissa, however:
- Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
- Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
- Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.
Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
8 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
FLpanhandle91 wrote:This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.
Eta clearly had an EWRC when recon arrived and its pinhole wasn't stable at all. That is not the case here
3 likes
-
Tekken_Guy
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 148
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:08 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
3 likes
-
Hurricane Mike
- Category 2

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Video Update on Melissa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAO4n3wryfE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAO4n3wryfE
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
It appears that the southerly jog has stopped, and wobbling the other direction now.


Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
-
Sciencerocks
- Category 5

- Posts: 10055
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
If the wind can catch up to appearance. I think it is possible. We'll probably wake up at 8am est to its peak! Haf-a and b suggest that this thing may become 150-155 knots tomarrow and up to landfall on Jamaica. We will see.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
The northwest section of the storm seems to continuously be the weakest or most unstable, I wonder why that is?
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
Goalposts, Atlantic and worldwide in 2025:
- Humberto: 140 kt, 924 mb
- Errol (Australian region, JTWC): 140 kt, 919 mb
- Erin: 140 kt, 915 mb
- Ragasa (JTWC): 145 kt, 910 mb
- Ragasa (JMA): 905 mb (10-min wind 110 kt)
Sub-905 to surpass Ragasa can be a stretch, though Melissa still has a fair chance to succeed.
4 likes
Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.
A few differences from Melissa, however:
- Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
- Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
- Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.
Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
4 likes
-
Sciencerocks
- Category 5

- Posts: 10055
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Woofde wrote:If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.
A few differences from Melissa, however:
- Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
- Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
- Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.
Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
Sometimes it takes time for the wind to catch up with the appearance. This impressive satellite structure with the lightening within the eye wall suggest that the wind will be forced closer to the surface.
2 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
3 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Working all afternoon & evening with hardly a chance to catch up with the days recon data, Discussion updates and satellite analysis has been torturous, but from what I'm seeing might be perfect timing to sit back and watch. I know a number of you guys have already expressed this but..... right here - right now, there is no way that Melissa is not a Cat 5. Where's the Air Force plane? I'll eat my underwear if I'm wrong 
4 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Jamaica radar loop update. Back to a North of due west jog here.


Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is.Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.
But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities.
I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.
It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.
That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
5 likes
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ScottNAtlanta, Teban54 and 138 guests








