boca_chris wrote:but the statistical models (i.e, BAM) have been more accurate this year so far so I would favor those more.
With Irene, I believe the Topical models were more west and south, and the globals stayed further offshore.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
boca_chris wrote:but the statistical models (i.e, BAM) have been more accurate this year so far so I would favor those more.
dwg71 wrote:boca_chris wrote:but the statistical models (i.e, BAM) have been more accurate this year so far so I would favor those more.
With Irene, I believe the Topical models were more west and south, and the globals stayed further offshore.
boca_chris wrote:yes, I see your point WeatherEmporer....how strong and far south will this trough get?
Derek Ortt wrote:The BAM models are in no way statistical models. Beta and advection are simple dynamic principles
Frank2 wrote:Here's the latest 1/2-mile Visible loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
it appears to be more of an open wave at this time, especially in the last few frames.
Frank
P.S. My apologies for yelling at our Destructo5 friend yesterday - but, please - no more "drinking" jokes (especially since I've never touched the stuff, anyway. Water, low-fat milk, CJ, Sprite, and caffine-free classic Coke are my favorites, even though I've heard that carbonated drinks can cause kidney stones).
Frank
WeatherEmperor wrote:~Floydbuster wrote:
what does that mean Floydbuster?
<RICKY>
Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, Cpv17, cycloneye, hurricanes1234, islandgirl45, jhpigott, JtSmarts, Keldeo1997, Ulf, WaveBreaking, wxman57 and 69 guests