? Looks normal sized to me.Wnghs2007 wrote:gkrangers wrote:Ok...the GFDL is plotted several hours AFTER the model run time.Wnghs2007 wrote:clfenwi wrote:
Keep in mind that the GFDL posted there was initialized at 18Z. Its initialized position is similar to that of the other 18Z models.
if you look at the placement and time on the chart it was initalized at 2325 z or 1 hour before the other GFS models did. That is the newest gfdl, the old gfdl was the 1735 z and was further south and west.
Like I said a flip flop a septillion times is coming.
So...the 18z GFDL gets plotted around 2300z.
The 00z GFDL gets plotted around 0500z.
Etc...get it?
OK no need for the LARGE text. THANKS
TD12 Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
0 likes
Sanibel wrote:On further review the feature just west of Long Island is tracking like a surface center and even has a small section of it visible on the south side of the LLC. Its motion and look is exactly like an established LLC tracking WNW. What were they talking about? There was no relocation.
To me it looks to be curving ever so slightly...
AFWA was talking 'center relocation' relative to their previous estimate, which was done at 2030Z and put the center at 23.3N 73.9W. If they didn't call it a center relocation (on their part), then they would be saying that the center moved at a 20 knot clip or so, which obviously isn't the case.
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 264
- Age: 59
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
- Location: Ocean Springs, MS
There are three main satellite observation agencies: AFGWC, TAFB, and SAB... TAFB is the Hurricane Research Division I believe although someone please correct me... SAB is the Satellite Applications Branch in Washington, D.C. and AFGWC is Air Force Global Weather Central. All three observe the tropical oceans (not just the Atlantic) and make satellite "fixes" to be used by their subscribers... These are subjective estimates using the Dvorak classification method. Their satellite fixes are made every hour around 0000 UTC, 0600 UTC, 1200 UTC and 1800 UTC.
The AFGWC fix posted earlier at 08/24/0015 UTC was simply that agency's satellite estimate position of TD #12 at that time. It is quite rare for all three agencies to have the same satellite fixes, obviously, especially for developing and disorganized systems such as this. When they stated they "relocated the center to the west" they meant from their satellite fix at 1800 UTC earlier this afternoon. The NHC forecaster uses fix positions from all agencies including their own estimates before issuing its "official" position estimate for advisories.
So all that statement about relocation was meant for the GWC forecasters who were fixing it earlier today, not for NHC.
Lastly, when deciphering the Dvorak codes... the first set of numbers is the "current intensity number," and the second set behind the backslash is the "final t-number." Sometimes the current intensity number can be higher or lower than the final t-number based on intensity trends such as weakening or strengthening... However, the final t-number has very strict rules based on how high it can go during the first 24 hours. Therefore, many system's have lower t-numbers when developing rapidly than is perhaps actually present.
The AFGWC fix posted earlier at 08/24/0015 UTC was simply that agency's satellite estimate position of TD #12 at that time. It is quite rare for all three agencies to have the same satellite fixes, obviously, especially for developing and disorganized systems such as this. When they stated they "relocated the center to the west" they meant from their satellite fix at 1800 UTC earlier this afternoon. The NHC forecaster uses fix positions from all agencies including their own estimates before issuing its "official" position estimate for advisories.
So all that statement about relocation was meant for the GWC forecasters who were fixing it earlier today, not for NHC.
Lastly, when deciphering the Dvorak codes... the first set of numbers is the "current intensity number," and the second set behind the backslash is the "final t-number." Sometimes the current intensity number can be higher or lower than the final t-number based on intensity trends such as weakening or strengthening... However, the final t-number has very strict rules based on how high it can go during the first 24 hours. Therefore, many system's have lower t-numbers when developing rapidly than is perhaps actually present.
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 264
- Age: 59
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
- Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Floyd,
This is the link to the Satellite Services Division of the Satellite Applications Branch, or SAB (I believe)... If I am wrong someone please correct me?
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html
this link will show the T-numbers for all tropical cyclones around the globe.
Hope this helps...
This is the link to the Satellite Services Division of the Satellite Applications Branch, or SAB (I believe)... If I am wrong someone please correct me?
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html
this link will show the T-numbers for all tropical cyclones around the globe.
Hope this helps...
0 likes
djones65 wrote:(snip)
Lastly, when deciphering the Dvorak codes... the first set of numbers is the "current intensity number," and the second set behind the backslash is the "final t-number." Sometimes the current intensity number can be higher or lower than the final t-number based on intensity trends such as weakening or strengthening... However, the final t-number has very strict rules based on how high it can go during the first 24 hours. Therefore, many system's have lower t-numbers when developing rapidly than is perhaps actually present.
Got it backwards... first number is the final t-number (from satellite estimate), and the second is the current intensity number.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/dvorak.html
0 likes
Barely maybe less than 5mph NNW, according to the past few hours.http://www.wunderground.com/global/Region/g4/2xpxIRSatellite.htmlHURAKAN wrote:Are my eyes or is really TD 12 not moving?
0 likes
Sanibel wrote:A small convection dot just formed near the Cuban portion. It hooks towards the Cuban portion, not the Long Island center???
not picking sides (because honestly I can't see a center) but I would have to agree with you on this one......Mid level vortex closer to cuba?? possibly....dont really know....
dont you just hate TS's in there infancy.....terrible two's all over again...

0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:27 am
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: afswo, Hurricane2022, jgh, Stratton23, wwizard and 23 guests