Hurricane Katrina

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
superfly

#1881 Postby superfly » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:07 pm

Definitely a secondary wind maxima has formed. PLEASE WEAKEN.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#1882 Postby senorpepr » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:08 pm

VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
Storm Name: KATRINA (12L)
Mission Number: 20
Flight ID: AF305
Observation Number: 04
Time: 02:36:10Z
Latitude: 27.6°N
Longitude: 89.4°W
Location: 119 mi SSE of Grand Isle, Louisana
Minimum height at 700 mb 2289 m
Est. Surface Winds Observed: NA
Distance and bearing from center to max surface wind: NA
Maximum flight level wind: NE (35°) @ 141 mph
Distance and bearing from center to max flight level wind: 17 mi NW (306°)
Sea level pressure: 908 mb
Max flight level temperature outside the eye: 55°F at 9902 feet
Max flight level temperature inside the eye: 77°F at 9915 feet
Dewpoint temperature inside the eye: 63°F
Eye character: CLOSED WALL
Eye shape: Circular
Eye diameter: 35 mi
Fix determined by: Penetration Radar Wind Pressure Temperature at 700 mb
Navigation / Met Accuracy: 0.03 / 2 nm
MAX FL WIND 122 KT NW QUAD 02:31:40 Z
0 likes   

User avatar
Bolebuns
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 55
Age: 64
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 11:56 am
Location: Waco,Texas
Contact:

#1883 Postby Bolebuns » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:09 pm

TPACane04 wrote:give it up, we ain't buying your sack of BS...you look at this WV loop and show me the all the dry air and shear....

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html

the last few frames show the purple is almost surrounding the eye again, and could actually gain more strength prior to landfall.


Relax. You are both right...sort of.

That is, even the weather channel was suggesting that it wasn't quite as well organized, and that there is some possible sheer on the horizon. BUT, TPA is right, it is looking better in the last few frames, and the sheer being wished for is stiill a way off. This is very dangerous, as this storm could still bomb before landfall as easy as it could weaken. Just treat it like the worst case and be safe.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#1884 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:10 pm

Looks like right on time for your normal Major hurricane weaken over the northern Gulf. Theres a reason that Camille is the one in only.
1 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#1885 Postby CronkPSU » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:10 pm

VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
Storm Name: KATRINA (12L)
Mission Number: 20
Flight ID: AF305
Observation Number: 04
Time: 02:36:10Z
Latitude: 27.6°N
Longitude: 89.4°W
Location: 119 mi SSE of Grand Isle, Louisana
Minimum height at 700 mb 2289 m
Est. Surface Winds Observed: NA
Distance and bearing from center to max surface wind: NA
Maximum flight level wind: NE (35°) @ 141 mph
Distance and bearing from center to max flight level wind: 17 mi NW (306°)
Sea level pressure: 908 mb
Max flight level temperature outside the eye: 55°F at 9902 feet
Max flight level temperature inside the eye: 77°F at 9915 feet
Dewpoint temperature inside the eye: 63°F
Eye character: CLOSED WALL
Eye shape: Circular
Eye diameter: 35 mi
Fix determined by: Penetration Radar Wind Pressure Temperature at 700 mb
Navigation / Met Accuracy: 0.03 / 2 nm
MAX FL WIND 122 KT NW QUAD 02:31:40 Z
0 likes   

Mello1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:08 pm
Location: Chicago

#1886 Postby Mello1 » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:10 pm

WWLTV met said that it's starting to go thru ERC. That may be what is happening...
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#1887 Postby storms in NC » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:11 pm

Brent wrote:
steveklein wrote:maybe it will get its act together before landfall... but seeing the sheer coming from the west, and reading the NHC discussion lends me to think the weakening will continue.


WOW... 5 whole knots.


Brent please don't respon to them. Only get you in trouble and I think you are very good.
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#1888 Postby CronkPSU » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:11 pm

Mello1 wrote:WWLTV met said that it's starting to go thru ERC. That may be what is happening...


certainly hope not, seems like there is still enough time for it to bomb out
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#1889 Postby Brent » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:13 pm

Oh yeah... 908 mb... a lot of weakening. :roll:
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
swimaster20
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: The Heart of Cajun Country

#1890 Postby swimaster20 » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:14 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Looks like right on time for your normal Major hurricane weaken over the northern Gulf. Theres a reason that Camille is the one in only.


I wouldn't speak so soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

#1891 Postby JtSmarts » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:15 pm

Max Mayfield just commented on CNN that an ERC was likely starting.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#1892 Postby Thunder44 » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:16 pm

Recon still isn't reporting these double or concentric eyewalls that TPC were talking about in their discussion. I question really if the rise in pressure is a result of an ERC.
0 likes   

Foladar

#1893 Postby Foladar » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:17 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Looks like right on time for your normal Major hurricane weaken over the northern Gulf. Theres a reason that Camille is the one in only.

There's still plenty of time, a good 100 miles from land ..
0 likes   

Solaris
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:54 am

#1894 Postby Solaris » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:17 pm

even in category 3 intensity it would be a very dangerous storm just because of the largeness and the slow-moving.
0 likes   

mtm4319
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:47 am
Location: Mobile, AL

#1895 Postby mtm4319 » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:18 pm

Image

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#1896 Postby Brent » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:19 pm

Solaris wrote:even in category 3 intensity it would be a very dangerous storm just because of the largeness and the slow-moving.


It's not going down to a 3...

Cat 4 is the best we can hope for... 908 mb is still REALLY REALLY REALLY low for anything other than a solid Cat 5.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#1897 Postby senorpepr » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:20 pm

Image
0 likes   

Solaris
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:54 am

#1898 Postby Solaris » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:22 pm

how much will the nighttime have an effect? limited room for strengthening?
0 likes   

User avatar
nystate
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1207
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 2:58 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC

#1899 Postby nystate » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:23 pm

Good luck everyone!

And as long as everyone is throwing out numbers, here is my official landfall prediction- 140 mph. Just a wild guess, so take it for what it is worth (nothing!).

NOLA will take some damage, but it will be fine IMHO. Give it a month or two to recover, but it will still be the same city come Thanksgiving.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#1900 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:23 pm

Brent wrote:
Solaris wrote:even in category 3 intensity it would be a very dangerous storm just because of the largeness and the slow-moving.


It's not going down to a 3...

Cat 4 is the best we can hope for... 908 mb is still REALLY REALLY REALLY low for anything other than a solid Cat 5.



I agree...if in fact shes going through an ERC I dont think 8 hours is enough to complete it and re-intensify...."re-intensify" have to catch myself....a high end Cat 4 is plenty bad enough for these people as it is...
0 likes   


Return to “2005”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest