Will Stan be retired?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

Will Stan be retired?

Yes
28
46%
No
23
38%
Not sure/It depends
10
16%
 
Total votes: 61

Message
Author
fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Will Stan be retired?

#1 Postby fasterdisaster » Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:46 pm

Killing at least 59 people, I think it will reach 100, and taking a sharp somewhat unexpected turn south?
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1199
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#2 Postby Buck » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:08 pm

They retired Cesar... I think they will retire Stan.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#3 Postby Coredesat » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:12 pm

They should, but I have a gut feeling they won't.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#4 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:37 pm

If you retire every storm...what will we use in the future? Im not sure death toll alone is just to retire a storm..I think a lot of variables come in to play.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#5 Postby Scorpion » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:40 pm

They most likely won't.
0 likes   

User avatar
gilbert88
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 367
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:57 pm

#6 Postby gilbert88 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:40 pm

hurricanedude wrote:If you retire every storm...what will we use in the future? Im not sure death toll alone is just to retire a storm..I think a lot of variables come in to play.


Would you say that if a storm killed 50+ people in the U.S.?
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#7 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:43 pm

yes i would gilbert 88
0 likes   

User avatar
gilbert88
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 367
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:57 pm

#8 Postby gilbert88 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:44 pm

Well, I disagree, I think death toll should be the primary reason to determine storm retirement. And 50+ dead people are more than enough :( .
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#9 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:45 pm

you have to take death toll, insured property damage, crop loss...economical loss etc, and weigh it all out...I dont think a cat 1 storm devestated that area
0 likes   

krysof

#10 Postby krysof » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:46 pm

hurricanedude wrote:you have to take death toll, insured property damage, crop loss...economical loss etc, and weigh it all out...I dont think a cat 1 storm devestated that area


The fact is: it was a slow moving and strenghtening category 1, that was on the verge of major hurricane status if a had maybe at least 6 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#11 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm

disagree all you want...thats what makes us different.....but no way 50 deaths qualifies for retirement..I admit, its sad to see this many die...but when you live on the coast...its almost a certain someone will get hurt or die, a chance all coastal residents take from Maine to Mexico
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#12 Postby AussieMark » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:48 pm

why was Lili in 2002 retired anyway?

I mean damages weren't exactly excessive (1998 had hurricanes and tropical storms that caused similar amounts in 1998 Dollars not 2002 dollars)

I think the death toll was on the lower end of the scale?
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#13 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:49 pm

the fact is it was a cat 1 landfall cane.....IF....forget the IFs....the fact was it was a cat one...6 hours it could have been more, but it want..cant retire a storm on IFS
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#14 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:50 pm

Before 1995, a tropical storm and/or minimal hurricane wouldn't have been retired even if it killed thousands. Examples include Gordon and Alberto 1994, and Juan 1985. Exception would be Klaus 1990 maybe because France wanted it to be retired.

Nowadays, almost every storm is. And remember there could still be more devastation than what is depicted in the news stories. So if Mexico doesn't ask for retirement, Guatemala will, and if they do not, then at least El Salvador will.

So of course I say yes.
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#15 Postby AussieMark » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:50 pm

hurricanedude wrote:you have to take death toll, insured property damage, crop loss...economical loss etc, and weigh it all out...I dont think a cat 1 storm devestated that area


Is this a completely different scenario to Cesar in 1996?
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#16 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:51 pm

Lili was once a cat 4 storm..the winds diminished but the storm produced cat 3/4 surge...lot of coastal damage and such
0 likes   

chadtm80

#17 Postby chadtm80 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:51 pm

I say yes.. Retired
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanedude
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 1856
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#18 Postby hurricanedude » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:52 pm

CHAD U DA MAN!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1199
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#19 Postby Buck » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:59 pm

tropicalweatherwatcher wrote:why was Lili in 2002 retired anyway?

I mean damages weren't exactly excessive (1998 had hurricanes and tropical storms that caused similar amounts in 1998 Dollars not 2002 dollars)

I think the death toll was on the lower end of the scale?


Lili was retired because of the hype surrounding the once Cat 4.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#20 Postby f5 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:11 pm

Allision was a TS when she was retired he was a CAT 1 same story
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hurricane2022, Teban54 and 139 guests