What storms should be retired vs. what names will be retired
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Aqua Teen Hunger Force
What storms should be retired vs. what names will be retired
So in another thread we hear about 1,100 dead from a mudslide caused by Stan. If this happened in America, Stan would be automatically retired. But since this happened in Mexico, it's anyone's guess. That's sad.
Are there any other casses like this in 2005?
Are there any other casses like this in 2005?
0 likes
Re: What storms should be retired vs. what names will be ret
Aqua Teen Hunger Force wrote:So in another thread we hear about 1,100 dead from a mudslide caused by Stan. If this happened in America, Stan would be automatically retired. But since this happened in Mexico, it's anyone's guess. That's sad.
Are there any other casses like this in 2005?
Stan is pretty much retired now. Some people seem to think it shouldn't because it wasn't a Cat. 5, but it will be retired.
Isidore killed 3 and was retired... why shouldn't Stan, it's already proven deadlier and costlier.
0 likes
Re: What storms should be retired vs. what names will be ret
gilbert88 wrote:Aqua Teen Hunger Force wrote:So in another thread we hear about 1,100 dead from a mudslide caused by Stan. If this happened in America, Stan would be automatically retired. But since this happened in Mexico, it's anyone's guess. That's sad.
Are there any other casses like this in 2005?
Stan is pretty much retired now. Some people seem to think it shouldn't because it wasn't a Cat. 5, but it will be retired.
Isidore killed 3 and was retired... why shouldn't Stan, it's already proven deadlier and costlier.
If Isidore killed 3 people, then it was retired for some other reason.
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
- Dr. Jonah Rainwater
- Category 2

- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
- Location: Frisco, Texas
- Contact:
- Dr. Jonah Rainwater
- Category 2

- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
- Location: Frisco, Texas
- Contact:
Although honestly, I personally don't think Emily should be retired. I know she was extremely strong, and extremely unusual, but she weakened before she hit a relatively low-populated region of the Yucatan, and then became one of 4 hurricanes to strengthen into major hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico this year, before hitting another sparsely-populated area of Mexico. The death toll for the entire system, including traffic accidents, was 8. I think Tropical Storm Gert had a comparable death toll. And the tourist areas around Cancun, and the economic centers around Tampico and Veracruz were virtually left alone.
Of course, when you put together this Emily, and the Emily of 1993 in North Carolina, and the Emily of 1987 in the Dominican Republic...there are probably enough sheer memories attatched to this name to get it retired.
Of course, when you put together this Emily, and the Emily of 1993 in North Carolina, and the Emily of 1987 in the Dominican Republic...there are probably enough sheer memories attatched to this name to get it retired.
0 likes
-
HurricaneBill
- Category 5

- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Emily made two major landfalls on Mexico. Emily was very damaging on the second landfall.
Remember, Hurricane Anita in 1977 made landfall in a very sparsely populated area of Mexico as an upper-end Category 4.
10 people were killed and forests were pretty much flattened.
Although a pretty much forgotten storm nowadays, Hurricane Anita was extremely vital in regards to hurricane research. I'm sure Derek probably knows the importance of Anita in hurricane research.
Remember, Hurricane Anita in 1977 made landfall in a very sparsely populated area of Mexico as an upper-end Category 4.
10 people were killed and forests were pretty much flattened.
Although a pretty much forgotten storm nowadays, Hurricane Anita was extremely vital in regards to hurricane research. I'm sure Derek probably knows the importance of Anita in hurricane research.
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
Anita is one storm I have not looked at or am very familiar with
That said, I do know its history quite well
As for Emily, the NE Mexican coast is as bad off, if not worse than Cameron and Mississippi. I saw damage photos there on a spanish TV station in Miami and let me tell you, what occurred there was far worse than the Tsunami from last year. That area received the worst destruction of any area in the 2005 hurricane season. Nearly every house was removed from its foundation
That said, I do know its history quite well
As for Emily, the NE Mexican coast is as bad off, if not worse than Cameron and Mississippi. I saw damage photos there on a spanish TV station in Miami and let me tell you, what occurred there was far worse than the Tsunami from last year. That area received the worst destruction of any area in the 2005 hurricane season. Nearly every house was removed from its foundation
0 likes
- Dr. Jonah Rainwater
- Category 2

- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
- Location: Frisco, Texas
- Contact:
Oh...I had no idea. I wonder why the US Media gave it such lousy coverage? I guess it missed Cancun and Brownsville and that was all they really cared about. I've noticed that, since the worldwide attention and outpouring from Katrina, we seem to be alot more aware of disasters in other countries, like Stan and the earthquake in Pakistan. That's good, I guess.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Dr. Jonah Rainwater wrote:Oh...I had no idea. I wonder why the US Media gave it such lousy coverage? I guess it missed Cancun and Brownsville and that was all they really cared about. I've noticed that, since the worldwide attention and outpouring from Katrina, we seem to be alot more aware of disasters in other countries, like Stan and the earthquake in Pakistan. That's good, I guess.
Unfortunately, global coverage of tropical cyclones has been very limited until around Katrina when the media started picking up on the abnormal amount of cyclones this season. Now the media will jump on anything tropical cyclone-related. Honestly, I'm surprised I haven't heard much about TD 21W in the WPAC.
It's kind of like the shark attacks a few years ago. Although nothing was abnormal about it, it was being publicized more. The media jumped all over it and before we knew it, every single shark attack became the top story. Well... until September 11th happened and then the shark "quit" attacking.
0 likes
-
Anonymous
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: chaser1, StormWeather, Team Ghost, Wein and 295 guests





