[/
Wilma's Future?
Moderator: S2k Moderators

f5 wrote:lsu2001 wrote:Well Katrina proved that a storm does not have to be a Cat 5 to do tremendous damage. I pray that Wilma really drops off way before hitting fla. I would hate to see a cat 4 or 5 type surge with a Cat 2 or 3 storm. This country simply cannot afford too much more damage.
TIm![]()
![]()
at landfall.Katrina was a CAT 5 out at sea


Terrell wrote:I heard at 1:20am EDT that Wilma had sustained winds of 150mph, if she keeps strengthening then she'll probably get those 6 mph she needs to reach Cat 5. I still hope she weakens though before reaching landfall.
HurricaneBill wrote:Terrell wrote:I heard at 1:20am EDT that Wilma had sustained winds of 150mph, if she keeps strengthening then she'll probably get those 6 mph she needs to reach Cat 5. I still hope she weakens though before reaching landfall.
Oh, she'll definitely weaken prior to landfall. A hurricane can't maintain Category 5 for long.
I predict we'll be having another screaming match with Derek about her intensity at landfall.
superfly wrote:These storms keep one-upping the other ones intensity wise. Katrina 902, Rita 897, Wilma 892.
Terrell wrote:superfly wrote:These storms keep one-upping the other ones intensity wise. Katrina 902, Rita 897, Wilma 892.
I'd have to agree. These female storms whose names end in A are playing 1up with each other. Hopefully Beta won't decide she wants to 1up Wilma
mtm4319 wrote:Terrell wrote:superfly wrote:These storms keep one-upping the other ones intensity wise. Katrina 902, Rita 897, Wilma 892.
I'd have to agree. These female storms whose names end in A are playing 1up with each other. Hopefully Beta won't decide she wants to 1up Wilma
Thankfully, I don't think we have to worry about that anymore. After all, the Greek letters don't have a gender.
Users browsing this forum: HurricaneFan, hurricanes1234, StormWeather, Teban54 and 313 guests