Anyone remember Saturday?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Post Reply
Message
Author
al79philly
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:19 pm

Anyone remember Saturday?

#1 Postby al79philly » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:06 pm

GFDL called for 898 mb and 151 knots when Wilma was still a TD. Pretty good call - I just remembered thinking how crazy that sounded.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#2 Postby LAwxrgal » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:07 pm

And she got even stronger!
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends
Top
User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:
Contact skysummit

#3 Postby skysummit » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:09 pm

That was an awesome call by the GFDL. I thought it was on crack, but it proved me wrong.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2128
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

#4 Postby Canelaw99 » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:13 pm

Yeah - we all thought it was high on something, and now we're hoping the same thing. We know how its first prediction turned out though.
0 likes   
Top
tampaflwx
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:51 pm

#5 Postby tampaflwx » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:50 pm

where had it predicted landfall? i'm curious now...
0 likes   
Top
floridahurricaneguy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:37 pm
Location: Tampa,FL
Contact:
Contact floridahurricaneguy

#6 Postby floridahurricaneguy » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:08 pm

tampaflwx wrote:where had it predicted landfall? i'm curious now...


Originally Tampa! So I am still worried just because were in the cone. Now wouldnt be creep if landfall ended up back were it orginally said.

Matt
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#7 Postby hicksta » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:14 pm

floridahurricaneguy wrote:
tampaflwx wrote:where had it predicted landfall? i'm curious now...


Originally Tampa! So I am still worried just because were in the cone. Now wouldnt be creep if landfall ended up back were it orginally said.

Matt


They tend to do that alot dont they.. Makes you mad.. IM SAFE!! o crap wait. WHAT!!!
0 likes   
Top
tampaflwx
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:51 pm

#8 Postby tampaflwx » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:35 pm

maybe we can learn a lesson for future hurricane forecasting...

we should run one model 7 days out, and base everything off of that. that way, there are no conflicting forecasts of landfall or intensity. it is just one concentrated, definite path.
0 likes   
Top
floridahurricaneguy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:37 pm
Location: Tampa,FL
Contact:
Contact floridahurricaneguy

#9 Postby floridahurricaneguy » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:36 pm

tampaflwx wrote:maybe we can learn a lesson for future hurricane forecasting...

we should run one model 7 days out, and base everything off of that. that way, there are no conflicting forecasts of landfall or intensity. it is just one concentrated, definite path.


No offense but sounds like a very unsmart thing to do. To many things can change 7 days out.

Matt
0 likes   
Top
SamSagnella
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 630
Age: 39
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Westport, CT
Contact:
Contact SamSagnella

#10 Postby SamSagnella » Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:10 pm

tampaflwx wrote:we should run one model 7 days out, and base everything off of that. that way, there are no conflicting forecasts of landfall or intensity. it is just one concentrated, definite path.


What? No offense, but that is about the worst thing one could do to prepare for a storm. If we did that with Katrina, for which the models predicted a Big Bend Category 1 landfall 7 days out, tens of thousands would have died.
0 likes   
Top
nequad
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:36 pm

#11 Postby nequad » Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:31 pm

Well...just my 2 cent...but I've been following computer model guidance closely for the past ten years, and I often find that model runs 6-7 days out will often be correct, or closer to reality, than the guidance in the 4-5 day range. Not always the case for sure...but I've seen this happen many times.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
Dr. Jonah Rainwater
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
Location: Frisco, Texas
Contact:
Contact Dr. Jonah Rainwater

#12 Postby Dr. Jonah Rainwater » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:08 am

I remember that model map with Katrina mostly clustered on the Panhandle, except for that one outlier that went directly where Katrina ended up going.

Course now we've just jinxed it. No storm would allow itself to be predicted that well now while that we're expecting it to.
0 likes   
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Ivanhater and 474 guests