k-man wrote:jkt21787 wrote:963 mb. Steady for all intents and purposes.
In fact, the pressure has risen a bit....
It's down 1 mb from the last vortex about an hour and a half ago(964 mb).
Moderator: S2k Moderators
feederband wrote:Last night there was a post that had a little cartoon of a person in front of a computer going crazy and eventually killing him self...Does anyone no where that post is..
6SpeedTA95 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html
Lots of folks keep talking about how good the storm is looking, sorry its not. Is it getting better? Sure...but the thing isn't blowing up its slowly organizing, why all the sensationalism?
O Town wrote:6SpeedTA95 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html
Lots of folks keep talking about how good the storm is looking, sorry its not. Is it getting better? Sure...but the thing isn't blowing up its slowly organizing, why all the sensationalism?
Because we were not sure if this thing would would stengthen quickly, or not at all. It was forcasted to strengthen slowly, but I don't think alot of us were so sure. I don't think it is being sensationalized at all. Thats why the forum is here. To hear what everyone is thinking.
O Town wrote:6SpeedTA95 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html
Lots of folks keep talking about how good the storm is looking, sorry its not. Is it getting better? Sure...but the thing isn't blowing up its slowly organizing, why all the sensationalism?
Because we were not sure if this thing would would stengthen quickly, or not at all. It was forcasted to strengthen slowly, but I don't think alot of us were so sure. I don't think it is being sensationalized at all. Thats why the forum is here. To hear what everyone is thinking.
WxGuy1 wrote:O Town wrote:6SpeedTA95 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html
Lots of folks keep talking about how good the storm is looking, sorry its not. Is it getting better? Sure...but the thing isn't blowing up its slowly organizing, why all the sensationalism?
Because we were not sure if this thing would would stengthen quickly, or not at all. It was forcasted to strengthen slowly, but I don't think alot of us were so sure. I don't think it is being sensationalized at all. Thats why the forum is here. To hear what everyone is thinking.
I disagree... There are a handful of folks on here who have been adamant of rapid strengthening or "Cat 4 easily" intensity. Some folks use theemoticon in every post, and seem to imply that Wilma's rapidly strengthening each time a dark red or grey pixel shows on their satellite image. I don't really care if folks are reasonable or not, but it certainly doesn't give credit to the board to have folks who continue to play an armaggedon scenario. Of course there are different opinions, and I certainly can't guarantee that my forecast is better than someone else's, but I do think some people aren't presenting their case using actual data and thus seem to be forecasting based on a hunch or 'gut feeling', which is quite ill-advised.
WxGuy1 wrote:O Town wrote:6SpeedTA95 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html
Lots of folks keep talking about how good the storm is looking, sorry its not. Is it getting better? Sure...but the thing isn't blowing up its slowly organizing, why all the sensationalism?
Because we were not sure if this thing would would stengthen quickly, or not at all. It was forcasted to strengthen slowly, but I don't think alot of us were so sure. I don't think it is being sensationalized at all. Thats why the forum is here. To hear what everyone is thinking.
I disagree... There are a handful of folks on here who have been adamant of rapid strengthening or "Cat 4 easily" intensity. Some folks use theemoticon in every post, and seem to imply that Wilma's rapidly strengthening each time a dark red or grey pixel shows on their satellite image. I don't really care if folks are reasonable or not, but it certainly doesn't give credit to the board to have folks who continue to play an armaggedon scenario. Of course there are different opinions, and I certainly can't guarantee that my forecast is better than someone else's, but I do think some people aren't presenting their case using actual data and thus seem to be forecasting based on a hunch or 'gut feeling', which is quite ill-advised.
WxGuy1 wrote:Some folks use theemoticon in every post, and seem to imply that Wilma's rapidly strengthening each time a dark red or grey pixel shows on their satellite image. I don't really care if folks are reasonable or not, but it certainly doesn't give credit to the board to have folks who continue to play an armaggedon scenario.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests