2005 canes that were the worst in lost of life and damage?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

What Were 2005's Worst Canes that caused more damage and lost of life?

Poll ended at Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:42 pm

Dennis
0
No votes
Emily
0
No votes
Katrina
41
72%
Rita
3
5%
Wilma
2
4%
All of The Above
9
16%
Others (Specify)
2
4%
 
Total votes: 57

Message
Author
quandary
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:04 pm

#41 Postby quandary » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:31 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:1. Katrina (just by a nose over Dennis)
2. Dennis (leveled much of Cuba, enough said_
3. Wilma (leveled the Yucatan and severely damaged Sfla and the NW Bahamas)
4. Stan (killed many)
5. Emily (leveled NE Mexico and Grenada)
6. Rita (overall, had the least impact)


How devastating was Dennis, Derek? You seem to contend that it was the Katrina of the United States for Cuba. Certainly it wasn't that terribly bad for the US Coast (compared to Ivan, Katrina and even Ophelia). Was it a complete life-style breaker in Cuba?
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#42 Postby f5 » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:32 pm

quandary wrote:How is this a real question? Katrina caused 80 billion in damage and 1200 deaths. No other storm caused near that much damage and Stan is not considered responsible for the 1000-2000 deaths that resulted from its interaction with a tropical wave.


she could of killed 100,000+ if N.O would of been in the right front quadrient
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#43 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:35 pm

Cuba does not have the death toll that we do because Castro actually uses the military to evacuate millions, as he did with Dennis (I am NOT a Castro supporter). However, it hit the center of Cienfuegos, a fairly large city of a couple hundred thousand, and caused severe damage there and to most of East and central Cuba
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#44 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:36 pm

People who say Rita had little impact might want to see these pics. Many small towns in Cameron Parish were completely wiped out. I would post links to them but these pics are a must-see.

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#45 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:38 pm

Wow those pictures look bad... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

#46 Postby bvigal » Thu Dec 01, 2005 8:21 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I stand by my statement that Rita, while bad, is not on the scale of Dennis, which leveled 2/3 of Cuba, Emily, which flat out OBLITERATED NE Mexico and Grenada (U.S. media did not see the damage), Katrina, or Wilma, which severely damaged the Yucatan, Cuba, the Bahamas, and caused about twice as much damage as did Rita in the USA. The damage was severe from Rita, but just not on the scale overall as the others


uhh, Emily did not "obliterate" Grenada... at least not according to my friends who live there. Ivan did that last year, and only the southern part of the island was truly devasted, damaging or destroying most structures. Some who were still living under tarps for a roof this year got pretty wet during Emily (80kts), but it wasn't that bad. For anyone considering vacationing there, the Grenada tourism industry is back for business this season! :D
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#47 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Dec 01, 2005 8:44 pm

I had seen photos of severe damage to the northern parts of Grenada (which makes sense as the max winds occurred there from Emily, unless our media just showed Ivan photos again, which would not surprise me)
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#48 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:19 pm

Why do you all even have to compare storms? Good God that is WHY people in NO and Mississippi lost their lives.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#49 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:32 pm

Lindaloo wrote:Why do you all even have to compare storms? Good God that is WHY people in NO and Mississippi lost their lives.


We are comparing this year's storms against each other - not against other historic storms in other years. But there is a good point about why comparing storms (in this manner) is bad - whoever is affected by any one of the storms is going to say that storm that affected them is the worst.
0 likes   

User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

#50 Postby caribepr » Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:33 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
Lindaloo wrote:Why do you all even have to compare storms? Good God that is WHY people in NO and Mississippi lost their lives.


We are comparing this year's storms against each other - not against other historic storms in other years. But there is a good point about why comparing storms (in this manner) is bad - whoever is affected by any one of the storms is going to say that storm that affected them is the worst.


The whole idea of this question creeps me out. I love S2K for all the information I get, the sharing and caring...but to reduce this horrific season to which was the most devastating...gives me major shudders.
First, there were storms with no names that destroyed much, in terms of property and homes, and maybe that is the heart of my feelings.
If your father/mother/sister/brother/son/daughter/wife/husband/family member/dear friend died...which would be the worst storm in terms of life lost/property damage for YOU? There would be only one, the one that took everything that mattered to you away forever.
This question, based on statistics, takes away the humanity of the reality and I cannot be silent about that.
I KNOW it was a simple question, not intended to provoke feelings like I am having, so no need to justify the innocent intent...but I look at the responses and remember the horror on this site when the reality was happening and just have to say, please. Maybe in five years, this question. Right now...it's really difficult, when hundreds of thousands are still in the stunned mode of *how do we go on from here?*
Yes, a rant. Oh well.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#51 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:43 pm

caribepr wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:
Lindaloo wrote:Why do you all even have to compare storms? Good God that is WHY people in NO and Mississippi lost their lives.


We are comparing this year's storms against each other - not against other historic storms in other years. But there is a good point about why comparing storms (in this manner) is bad - whoever is affected by any one of the storms is going to say that storm that affected them is the worst.


The whole idea of this question creeps me out. I love S2K for all the information I get, the sharing and caring...but to reduce this horrific season to which was the most devastating...gives me major shudders.
First, there were storms with no names that destroyed much, in terms of property and homes, and maybe that is the heart of my feelings.
If your father/mother/sister/brother/son/daughter/wife/husband/family member/dear friend died...which would be the worst storm in terms of life lost/property damage for YOU? There would be only one, the one that took everything that mattered to you away forever.
This question, based on statistics, takes away the humanity of the reality and I cannot be silent about that.
I KNOW it was a simple question, not intended to provoke feelings like I am having, so no need to justify the innocent intent...but I look at the responses and remember the horror on this site when the reality was happening and just have to say, please. Maybe in five years, this question. Right now...it's really difficult, when hundreds of thousands are still in the stunned mode of *how do we go on from here?*
Yes, a rant. Oh well.


That was my point exactly. Great post caribepr.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#52 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:37 am

wxmann_91 wrote:
Lindaloo wrote:Why do you all even have to compare storms? Good God that is WHY people in NO and Mississippi lost their lives.


We are comparing this year's storms against each other - not against other historic storms in other years. But there is a good point about why comparing storms (in this manner) is bad - whoever is affected by any one of the storms is going to say that storm that affected them is the worst.


A hurricane is a hurricane!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hurricane2022, jlauderdal and 67 guests