Invest 95L,E of Bahamas,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #1

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4839
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#41 Postby ronjon » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:43 pm

CHRISTY wrote:
skysummit wrote:
CHRISTY wrote:Image


I don't see anything there...just a super potent ridge.


yep....


Bermuda Ridge is forecast to strengthen and expand westward. Compare TPC forecast from 24 to 48 hrs.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
0 likes   

CHRISTY

#42 Postby CHRISTY » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:44 pm

it may get driven on a W TO WNW direction....what u guys think?
Last edited by CHRISTY on Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#43 Postby WindRunner » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:45 pm

CHRISTY wrote:Image


That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fast :wink: for now
0 likes   

User avatar
JamesFromMaine2
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:38 am
Location: Portland Maine USA
Contact:

#44 Postby JamesFromMaine2 » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:46 pm

well this post I am editing may give to many people the wrong idea and its not worth it!
Last edited by JamesFromMaine2 on Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#45 Postby Cyclenall » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:47 pm

JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.

I noticed that as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#46 Postby Hyperstorm » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:53 pm

JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.


Excuse me, but how many have developed so far?..........1.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4839
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#47 Postby ronjon » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:53 pm

CHRISTY wrote:it may get driven on a W TO WNW direction....what u guys think?


If the Bermuda High gets stronger, the disturbance will simply ride the southern perhiphery toward the W-NW and eventually will turn north when it rounds the western side of the High when it reaches the latitude of its axis.
0 likes   

User avatar
Noles2006
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:57 am
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

No.

#48 Postby Noles2006 » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:54 pm

Cyclenall wrote:
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.

I noticed that as well.


LOL. The pro mets on this board have been damn near 100% correct this year in predicting development. The only invest they jumped on became Alberto. I'd start listening to them instead of freaking out over every little blow up of convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4839
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#49 Postby ronjon » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:55 pm

WindRunner wrote:
CHRISTY wrote:Image


That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fast :wink: for now


Cloud tops are cooling over the last few hours. Let's see what the diurnal maxima does tonight. There is a circulation seen at 24-67 on the VIS SAT.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: No.

#50 Postby WindRunner » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:56 pm

Noles2006 wrote:
Cyclenall wrote:
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.

I noticed that as well.


LOL. The pro mets on this board have been damn near 100% correct this year in predicting development. The only invest they jumped on became Alberto. I'd start listening to them instead of freaking out over every little blow up of convection.


:clap: Well said, well said.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#51 Postby Hyperstorm » Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:57 pm

ronjon wrote:
WindRunner wrote:
CHRISTY wrote:Image


That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fast :wink: for now


Cloud tops are cooling over the last few hours. Let's see what the diurnal maxima does tonight. There is a circulation seen at 24-67 on the VIS SAT.


Switch your words...Cloud tops are 'warming'. 'Nocturnal maxima' :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4839
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#52 Postby ronjon » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:05 pm

Hyperstorm wrote:
ronjon wrote:
WindRunner wrote:
CHRISTY wrote:Image


That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fast :wink: for now


Cloud tops are cooling over the last few hours. Let's see what the diurnal maxima does tonight. There is a circulation seen at 24-67 on the VIS SAT.


Switch your words...Cloud tops are 'warming'. 'Nocturnal maxima' :wink:


I'm dyslexic (sp) most of the time. I'm always putting my shoes on before my pants too.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#53 Postby skysummit » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:06 pm

Looks like it'll get ripped apart like it's cousin!
0 likes   

caneman

Re: No.

#54 Postby caneman » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:08 pm

Noles2006 wrote:
Cyclenall wrote:
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.

I noticed that as well.


LOL. The pro mets on this board have been damn near 100% correct this year in predicting development. The only invest they jumped on became Alberto. I'd start listening to them instead of freaking out over every little blow up of convection.


ahmm, No Alberto was not suppose to develop. And the invest was not suppose to get anywhere near classification and it did. Nothing against the mets but sometimes they are the exact opposite of our everything will develop posters. I know it is there job not to alarm people until something is actaully formed but doggone sure would like to hear their opinion on what the future holds for an invest than just stating something that is currently obvious.
0 likes   

CHRISTY

#55 Postby CHRISTY » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:09 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#56 Postby wxman57 » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:09 pm

Before you assume that the estimate of a central pressure of 1009mb is correct, you might want to check the latest surface observations around the system:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/95La.gif

As you can see, a better estimate might be about 1021mb. Pressures are very high in the area. I'm not sure what the invest pressure is based upon. But, if you remember, they had estimated the pressure of 94L at 1007 mb when it was closer to 1017mb.

For now, it's just another area of thunderstorms that we need to monitor. But with a cold front approaching from the west, it would seem a northerly track and out to sea would be most probable, in the unlikely event that conditions aloft would become more favorable for development. I think its chances for development are low, but perhaps slightly better than for 94L (maybe 5-10%). Here's a 400-700mb mean flow streamline chart for tomorrow morning:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/95Lb.gif
0 likes   

caneman

#57 Postby caneman » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:10 pm

skysummit wrote:Looks like it'll get ripped apart like it's cousin!


PLease explain. It's not gonna be rapid intensification but I don't see it getting ripped apart either
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#58 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:11 pm

I think development is possible, but it should not be a threat to the U.S.
0 likes   

caneman

#59 Postby caneman » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:12 pm

wxman57 wrote:Before you assume that the estimate of a central pressure of 1009mb is correct, you might want to check the latest surface observations around the system:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/95La.gif

As you can see, a better estimate might be about 1021mb. Pressures are very high in the area. I'm not sure what the invest pressure is based upon. But, if you remember, they had estimated the pressure of 94L at 1007 mb when it was closer to 1017mb.

For now, it's just another area of thunderstorms that we need to monitor. But with a cold front approaching from the west, it would seem a northerly track and out to sea would be most probable, in the unlikely event that conditions aloft would become more favorable for development. I think its chances for development are low, but perhaps slightly better than for 94L (maybe 5-10%). Here's a 400-700mb mean flow streamline chart for tomorrow morning:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/95Lb.gif


Thank you. Great job. I learned something.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa_God
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 333
Age: 35
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: New Port Richey/Trinity, FL

#60 Postby Tampa_God » Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:15 pm

caneman wrote:
skysummit wrote:Looks like it'll get ripped apart like it's cousin!


PLease explain. It's not gonna be rapid intensification but I don't see it getting ripped apart either

I think what he means is that this was actually 94L before it got ripped out by shear and now that we have 95L it will do the same.

Any chance of the shear from the west lighten up a bit?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], IcyTundra, Shawee and 41 guests