Bermuda Ridge is forecast to strengthen and expand westward. Compare TPC forecast from 24 to 48 hrs.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
Moderator: S2k Moderators
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.
CHRISTY wrote:it may get driven on a W TO WNW direction....what u guys think?
Cyclenall wrote:JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.
I noticed that as well.
WindRunner wrote:CHRISTY wrote:
That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fastfor now
Noles2006 wrote:Cyclenall wrote:JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.
I noticed that as well.
LOL. The pro mets on this board have been damn near 100% correct this year in predicting development. The only invest they jumped on became Alberto. I'd start listening to them instead of freaking out over every little blow up of convection.
ronjon wrote:WindRunner wrote:CHRISTY wrote:
That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fastfor now
Cloud tops are cooling over the last few hours. Let's see what the diurnal maxima does tonight. There is a circulation seen at 24-67 on the VIS SAT.
Hyperstorm wrote:ronjon wrote:WindRunner wrote:CHRISTY wrote:
That shows what the stills don't: it appears to have a nice circulation patter, but the problem is the circulation is unwinding . . . generally that means that it isn't going to develop all that fastfor now
Cloud tops are cooling over the last few hours. Let's see what the diurnal maxima does tonight. There is a circulation seen at 24-67 on the VIS SAT.
Switch your words...Cloud tops are 'warming'. 'Nocturnal maxima'
Noles2006 wrote:Cyclenall wrote:JamesFromMaine2 wrote:I am not bashing any one or anything by saying this but it seems like after last year all the pro-mets on here seem to be tired out and not wanting anything to develop. Every single system so far this year they have all been saying will not develop even if the NHC is saying they will or have a chance to develop.
I noticed that as well.
LOL. The pro mets on this board have been damn near 100% correct this year in predicting development. The only invest they jumped on became Alberto. I'd start listening to them instead of freaking out over every little blow up of convection.
wxman57 wrote:Before you assume that the estimate of a central pressure of 1009mb is correct, you might want to check the latest surface observations around the system:
http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/95La.gif
As you can see, a better estimate might be about 1021mb. Pressures are very high in the area. I'm not sure what the invest pressure is based upon. But, if you remember, they had estimated the pressure of 94L at 1007 mb when it was closer to 1017mb.
For now, it's just another area of thunderstorms that we need to monitor. But with a cold front approaching from the west, it would seem a northerly track and out to sea would be most probable, in the unlikely event that conditions aloft would become more favorable for development. I think its chances for development are low, but perhaps slightly better than for 94L (maybe 5-10%). Here's a 400-700mb mean flow streamline chart for tomorrow morning:
http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/95Lb.gif
caneman wrote:skysummit wrote:Looks like it'll get ripped apart like it's cousin!
PLease explain. It's not gonna be rapid intensification but I don't see it getting ripped apart either