NW Pacific: Tropical Storm Ewiniar (0603)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Matt-hurricanewatcher

#121 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:30 pm

The system has fallen apart...There appears to be a large partly closed eye(On 85h), and with the quick scats still showing hurricane force winds. I will say 75 knots for now.

We have to watch if that central Convetion can refire over the center. But I'm forecasting a slow windown for the next 12 to 24 hours any way. Who knows maybe a restrengthing at around 24 to 30 hours. But a weaking at 48 to 60 hours as it moves into stronger shear/cooler sst's.

0 75 knots
6 70 knots
12 60 knots
24 65 knots typhoon
36 70 knots
48 60 knots
60 50 knots
72 45 knots

Forecaster matthew
0 likes   

Seele
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:14 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#122 Postby Seele » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:32 pm

Cyclenall wrote:So did it go through a ERC or did it just do nothing and look worse on us?


Looked like both to me. This morning you could see an outer eyewall forming, but the northerly shear has finally got to it.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#123 Postby P.K. » Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:53 pm

RSMC TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY
NAME TY 0603 EWINIAR (0603)
ANALYSIS
PSTN 052100UTC 18.9N 129.1E GOOD
MOVE NW SLOWLY
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
50KT 90NM
30KT 250NM
FORECAST
24HF 062100UTC 20.2N 128.2E 90NM 70%
MOVE NW SLOWLY
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
45HF 071800UTC 22.8N 127.8E 150NM 70%
MOVE N 06KT
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
69HF 081800UTC 26.8N 126.9E 220NM 70%
MOVE NNW 10KT
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#124 Postby skysummit » Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:35 pm

Image Image
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#125 Postby whereverwx » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:07 pm

skysummit wrote:Image Image

What page on HurricaneAlley.net did you get those images from? Whenever I try to access the spaghetti model plots, it requires that I register. If those images are only available to registered users of HurricaneAlley.net, you shouldn’t post them.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#126 Postby skysummit » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:15 pm

calamity wrote:
skysummit wrote:Image Image

What page on HurricaneAlley.net did you get those images from? Whenever I try to access the spaghetti model plots, it requires that I register. If those images are only available to registered users of HurricaneAlley.net, you shouldn’t post them.


They are NOT from Hurricane Alley. They are made with Global Tracks. I am a licensed user of the software. Any image that is made with Global Tracks is completely legal to post as long as the "Global Tracks/Hurricane Alley" logo is placed on the map.
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#127 Postby whereverwx » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:17 pm

skysummit wrote:
calamity wrote:
skysummit wrote:Image Image

What page on HurricaneAlley.net did you get those images from? Whenever I try to access the spaghetti model plots, it requires that I register. If those images are only available to registered users of HurricaneAlley.net, you shouldn’t post them.


They are NOT from Hurricane Alley. They are made with Global Tracks. I am a licensed user of the software. Any image that is made with Global Tracks is completely legal to post as long as the "Global Tracks/Hurricane Alley" logo is placed on the map.

Oh, ok, thanks! :oops:
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#128 Postby skysummit » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:19 pm

calamity wrote:Oh, ok, thanks! :oops:


Hey...no problem. That's the only issue with them requiring that the logo is placed on the map. May people think that these maps are coming from a paid website. Just an FYI, when we get an active Invest or Storm in the Atlantic Basin, I'll also be uploading these model plots to my site:

http://www.skysummitweather.com/the_tropics.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#129 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Jul 05, 2006 8:44 pm

So it appears Ewiniar was a Category 4 at maximum strength...fairly intense
I'd say.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#130 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:05 pm

Image

Trying to reintensify as the eye is coming back to light!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#131 Postby skysummit » Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:08 pm

Yup....it's forecasted to regain Cat 4 intensity again before it weakens as it makes it's way to the north.
0 likes   

dwsqos2

#132 Postby dwsqos2 » Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:08 pm

This is a bit old, but no change from the JMA.

RSMC TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY
NAME TY 0603 EWINIAR (0603)
ANALYSIS
PSTN 060000UTC 19.2N 128.8E GOOD
MOVE NW SLOWLY
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
50KT 90NM
30KT 240NM
FORECAST
24HF 070000UTC 20.3N 127.8E 90NM 70%
MOVE NW SLOWLY
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
48HF 080000UTC 23.0N 127.0E 150NM 70%
MOVE NNW 07KT
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
72HF 090000UTC 27.0N 125.8E 220NM 70%
MOVE NNW 10KT
PRES 935HPA
MXWD 085KT
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#133 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:39 pm

That's why I don't like JMA, even when this system DID have Cat-4 winds they failed to upgrade this to ST Ewinar.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#134 Postby Cyclenall » Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:56 am

Yes it's forecasted to regain Cat 4 intensity before weakening and it's going through a ERC it looks. Last night it looked like it was doing that but I'm not sure what happened :lol: . It looks better now again though.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#135 Postby WindRunner » Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:03 am

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:That's why I don't like JMA, even when this system DID have Cat-4 winds they failed to upgrade this to ST Ewinar.


No, it's just that the definition of a STY is 130kt winds, and since the JMA uses a 10min average wind, 130kt is a good ways into the Cat 5 range. JMA did not FAIL to do anything, rather the storm failed to strengthen enough. The JTWC probably had a very accurate intensity for the 1-min winds (130kt max), as that corresponds well to the minimum pressure of 920hPa.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#136 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:07 am

To get a 130 knots 10-min typhoon, you will need 148.2 knots 1-min. Very few typhoons each year go this far.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#137 Postby P.K. » Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:00 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:That's why I don't like JMA, even when this system DID have Cat-4 winds they failed to upgrade this to ST Ewinar.


There is no such thing as a supertyphoon to the JMA. Have a look at the link I posted previously in this thread for storm definitions in the NW Pacific.

RSMC TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY
NAME TY 0603 EWINIAR (0603)
ANALYSIS
PSTN 061800UTC 20.6N 127.8E GOOD
MOVE NNW 06KT
PRES 940HPA
MXWD 085KT
50KT 90NM
30KT 240NM
FORECAST
24HF 071800UTC 22.9N 126.7E 90NM 70%
MOVE NNW 06KT
PRES 940HPA
MXWD 085KT
48HF 081800UTC 26.3N 126.0E 150NM 70%
MOVE NNW 08KT
PRES 940HPA
MXWD 085KT
72HF 091800UTC 31.7N 125.4E 220NM 70%
MOVE N 13KT
PRES 955HPA
MXWD 075KT
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145926
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#138 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:56 pm

Image

Ver interesting the track that goes to a place that is in the news right now.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#139 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:14 pm

Maybe this storm will hush up that dictator in N. Korea
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#140 Postby WindRunner » Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:42 pm

The track has been shifting westward, maybe Pyongyang can take a direct hit. It'll probably still be around 70kts per JTWC at that point if you interpolate and take into account the lack of landfall on a more westward track. Could get kinda funny here . . .
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, cycloneye, fllawyer, Google Adsense [Bot], Heretoserve, IsabelaWeather, lolitx, MetroMike, Stratton23, tolakram, wileytheartist and 66 guests