Tropical Storm Beryl

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Rainband

#141 Postby Rainband » Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:41 pm

OuterBanker wrote:NAM has it backing toward Hatteras then taking off to NE. Then there may be a piece that stays off Fla. I think that things are going to really wind up here shortly. I also think that the secnario for US hits is also setting up. The fact that the waters in eastern and mid atlantic are cooler is bad news. It allows these well formed systems that exit the African coast and then die out regenerate when they get in the west Atlantic instead of curving out to sea. What a beauty exiting Africa this am eh?
Kind of interesting Thanks for that perspective OB :)
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#142 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:59 pm

convections beginning to fire over the "center" of this system and it looks like its getting better organized, along with more defined cyclonic turning
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#143 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:14 pm

kenl01 wrote:Some interesting model runs from this evening. Two of them, the BAMM and BAMS take the system west into either North FL or coastal GA; the LBAR takes it into SC; the others out to sea.........



http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png


BEWARE the BAM models for any system in the subtropics (north of 20N latitude). The BAM models are simple trajectory models that remove the "storm" from the mean flow, analyze the general flow, and then re-insert the storm into the flow to see where it would go over the next 5 days if the current flow doesn't change. BAM models are not dynamic, so they won't account for the changing wind flow along the east U.S. Coast over the next few days. Look to the dynamic models like the GFS, ECMWF, GFDL, and maybe NOGAPS for better guidance for this system. One model I absolutely would never look at (seriously) is the NAM. It's uselessness is unmatched for tropical systems.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#144 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:36 pm

kenl01 wrote:Some interesting model runs from this evening. Two of them, the BAMM and BAMS take the system west into either North FL or coastal GA; the LBAR takes it into SC; the others out to sea.........
http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png


I have found that typically when models are spreading out like this it is indicative of slow/stationary movement.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#145 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:42 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:
kenl01 wrote:Some interesting model runs from this evening. Two of them, the BAMM and BAMS take the system west into either North FL or coastal GA; the LBAR takes it into SC; the others out to sea.........
http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png


I have found that typically when models are spreading out like this it is indicative of slow/stationary movement.


That can be true, particularly at low latitudes. But in northern latitudes where 97L is located, it's probably more a sign that current steering flow is weak. Problem is, changes occur much more frequently at northern latitudes than in the deep tropics, and the BAM models won't predict those changes.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#146 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:42 pm

Image

I haven't been able to check this area out... in fact I just momentarily checked on it during lunch at work. What's going on with it?
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#147 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:52 pm

NAM keeping it pretty stationary.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#148 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 pm

wow...maybe its me but that thing looks a bit different than before...not quite as elongated looking...this thing may have a chance yet...I say we at least have the chance of TS beryl here...Im not gonna go any further
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#149 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:19 pm

This area still looks to be mostly associated with a frontal boundry.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-rgb.html

I wouldn't be half suprised if the trough brings it northward with it.

If the southern end could cut off from the front it has a much better chance at being upgraded.

What's up with QuikScat?

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation

GFS indicates that it may begin moving more quickly to the north.
0 likes   

User avatar
Epsilon_Fan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

#150 Postby Epsilon_Fan » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:37 pm

it looks as if convection is still firing near the center but it is still unorganized
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#151 Postby storms in NC » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:40 pm

If you look at the last frame you can see were the spilt will be takeing place. The low has some bands staring around it
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#152 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:55 pm

Cycloneye did this in another thread, and I figured I'd do it because its funny as ever, anyways, from Monk-e-Mail to you guys in the best reporter voice they had http://www.careerbuilder.com/monk-e-mail/?mid=11732010 *fixed by Rainband*
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#153 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:56 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#154 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:04 pm

8 PM Discussion from TPC

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:

Above is the 8 PM discussion from TPC.I could not find a single word in there about the area where 97L is.I am right or someone can find a sentence that says something about this area?
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#155 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:19 pm

ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER



NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR



TROPICAL DEPRESSION INVEST 97L



INITIAL TIME 18Z JUL 17



DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT

REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD

NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC

OFFICIAL FORECAST.





FORECAST STORM POSITION



HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)



0 31.3 75.4 190./ 5.0

6 31.6 75.1 45./ 3.1

12 32.2 74.6 42./ 8.3

18 32.8 73.8 54./ 8.4

24 33.2 73.2 56./ 6.4

30 34.4 72.8 15./12.6

36 35.9 72.9 359./15.1

42 37.0 72.4 27./11.0

48 38.0 71.0 52./15.3

54 38.7 69.9 57./10.9

60 39.7 68.9 45./12.2

66 40.5 67.6 60./13.2

72 41.2 66.9 42./ 9.0

78 41.8 66.7 20./ 6.3

84 42.6 66.5 14./ 7.7

90 43.6 66.2 14./10.2



STORM DISSIPATED AT 90 HRS AT THE ABOVE PSN.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#156 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:21 pm

cycloneye wrote:8 PM Discussion from TPC

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:

Above is the 8 PM discussion from TPC.I could not find a single word in there about the area where 97L is.I am right or someone can find a sentence that says something about this area?


They do depict this feature on the TWD graphic.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/ATSA_18Z.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#157 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:22 pm

wow...thats up from the 12 hours before...
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#158 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:28 pm

GFDL does bring the winds associated with 97L to tropical storm force as it moves Northward through a weakness in the ridge.

http://bricker.met.psu.edu/~arnottj/cgi ... =Animation

I'll be interested to see if on the Cyclone Phase page if this will be warm or cold core in nature.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

#159 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:42 pm

Cycloneye, you're right. I can't find it either. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#160 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:45 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:GFDL does bring the winds associated with 97L to tropical storm force as it moves Northward through a weakness in the ridge.

http://bricker.met.psu.edu/~arnottj/cgi ... =Animation

I'll be interested to see if on the Cyclone Phase page if this will be warm or cold core in nature.
Actually Cat 1, it peaks at 65 knots...now whether its showing the area as extratropical or tropical at that time remains to be seen...
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests