Forecasting Chris - Most Difficult Storm in a Long Time

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#41 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:29 pm

The amazing thing is that the bottom of the TUTT "V" came roaring out of the north yesterday, and, hit Chris directly on target last night - not a bit to the west, or east, but right in the middle - and literally knocked the wind right out of it - very impressive, considering what a small target the system was at the time.

I happened to see that this morning on a local station, but, unfortunately the weathercaster may not have recognized it in the WV Loop she was showing, and, missed a good opportunity to make note of that incredible scene.

Makes you think...

Frank
Last edited by Frank2 on Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#42 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:30 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I seen the tutt catching Chris more then 6 to 12 hours before it happen. Heck I seen it a little longer. I can read a map.


Perhaps you want to shar with us the location of the TUTT because I never heard it in any of the discussions from the hurricane center or my local news. Perhaps you can go into a little more depth and show us what a TUTT looks like.



A Tutt is a upper level trough that forms normally at 25/55 which it avg...In its strongest at 250 to 300 millibars which makes it a upper level which means high in the Atmosphere. In this tutt upper level closed ULL's move southwestward through it forming shear. The tutt has strongest shear over the eastern part or southeastern Part...Which it shears tropical cyclones. But also it can have strong shear on its back side. Also at times in what almost happen with chris it can help tropical cyclones be forming outflow channel for the latent heat to be removed from the cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#43 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:34 pm

0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#44 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:36 pm

ok so in layman terms its a V shaped area of shear that comes from the poles toward the tropics that can destroy a system, right?
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#45 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:36 pm

Also take a look at the shear ten map which shows that the tutt moves northeast to southwest...Those decreasing area's of shear are likely ULL's or pulses moving down the tutt. The southwest side because its coming down southwestward is the strongest right now. You can see at 25/70 high increases in shear. With high shear around the front side at 20 north/60-62 west. That is the tutt.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8sht.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#46 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:38 pm

Hey Matt,

>>A Tutt is a upper level trough that forms normally at 25/55 which it avg...In its strongest at 250 to 300 millibars which makes it a upper level which means high in the Atmosphere. In this tutt upper level closed ULL's move southwestward through it forming shear. The tutt has strongest shear over the eastern part or southeastern Part...Which it shears tropical cyclones. But also it can have strong shear on its back side. Also at times in what almost happen with chris it can help tropical cyclones be forming outflow channel for the latent heat to be removed from the cyclone.

Perhaps you should have skipped that explanation. :ggreen:

Steve
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#47 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:39 pm

ok got it thank you, but looking at satellite what is at 26n 72w?
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

Rainband

#48 Postby Rainband » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:44 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Matt,

This TUTT interaction was not as easy as you make it out to be. That's a real cheap shot at NHC, IMO
With all due respect Derek, consider the source. The pros did the best they could. Sure it's easy to second guess after the fact. Matt I would like to see you do better than the NHC. Also, try having some respect while you are at it.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#49 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:46 pm

Rainband, I seen that this was likely to happen 12 hours before it did. If it did not get moving it was going to get sheared to death. In you could see that the shear was flating the top side.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#50 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:48 pm

A similar event happened with Daniel a couple of weeks ago. An UL formed that was not supposed to and sheared it quickly to death.

This is going to be a major problem over the ocean due to very few (i.e. no) observations
0 likes   

Rainband

#51 Postby Rainband » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:48 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Rainband, I seen that this was likely to happen 12 hours before it did. If it did not get moving it was going to get sheared to death. In you could see that the shear was flating the top side.
Well everybody argued with them when they said it was going to dissipate. Maybe because the ULL near florida weakened the ridge sooner than expected and allowed the tutt to move closer to Chris. Ever think about that? :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Noah
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 541
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Sarasota FL

#52 Postby Noah » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:57 pm

As usual its all speculation on the storm until it is like 24-48 hours upon us before we know anything it seems. I come here to get ideas, but I still follow the experts. This is strictly my opinion for myself.

Although charley made a quicky turn!! :eek:


So many threads on chris, I have not been reading them, just going to NHC and coming here to check the new tracking page.

Last year and year before I was coo coo on here.

Its just getting all to confusing for me on here anymore and people are starting to argue, I feel tense reading here sometimes. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#53 Postby Aquawind » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:57 pm

Interesting.. Someone jumping in to debate one aspect of one system to try and make their personal pat on the back versus the NHC. No real met would be so foolish without an alterior motive because they know their forecast can blow in 4 hours..
0 likes   

Rainband

#54 Postby Rainband » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:08 pm

Aquawind wrote:Interesting.. Someone jumping in to debate one aspect of one system to try and make their personal pat on the back versus the NHC. No real met would be so foolish without an alterior motive because they know their forecast can blow in 4 hours..
Exactly :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#55 Postby Swimdude » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:09 pm

Whew, we are grouchy today! :roll:
0 likes   

Rainband

#56 Postby Rainband » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:09 pm

Noah wrote:As usual its all speculation on the storm until it is like 24-48 hours upon us before we know anything it seems. I come here to get ideas, but I still follow the experts. This is strictly my opinion for myself.

Although charley made a quicky turn!! :eek:


So many threads on chris, I have not been reading them, just going to NHC and coming here to check the new tracking page.

Last year and year before I was coo coo on here.

Its just getting all to confusing for me on here anymore and people are starting to argue, I feel tense reading here sometimes :roll:
We are working on that Noah. Please don't let a few hot tempers ruin your experience here.
0 likes   

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

#57 Postby shaggy » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:19 pm

i was saying lastnight how so many people were using references to previous hurricanes and all of them were monsters.Nobody used any references on storms that fell apart.Goes to show that not every storm is going to do what people think it is even the pros who did the best they could!
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#58 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:22 pm

Everyone here needs to get some rest, instead of punching each other in the stomach over a swirl of clouds...
0 likes   

Rainband

#59 Postby Rainband » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:23 pm

Frank2 wrote:Everyone here needs to get some rest, instead of punching each other in the stomach over a swirl of clouds...
Best thing I have read in a few days!! :D :D :D
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, Google Adsense [Bot], O Town, ouragans and 64 guests