Update: Fat lady has yet to sing--Chris lives!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#221 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:52 am

fact789 wrote:i think the fat ladys humming and ready to explode (in either way)



Rolling on the floor :lol:
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
BayouVenteux
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 775
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)

#222 Postby BayouVenteux » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:52 am

Image

Ooooo, it's so close now with poor Chris...you just know it's on the tip of the good doctor's tongue. C'mon...say it!
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#223 Postby curtadams » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:53 am

AJC3 wrote:If the shear is 25 knots, then it's 25 knots. The shear is the magnitude of a vector difference that is caluclated relative to a base level, and typically these charts uses H85 wind. If storm motion is roughly the same as the H85 wind vector (sans the storm circ itself), then the shear charts are fairly accurate. If the shear was calculated relative to ground level, then what you would have would be...ahem...250MB windspeed. :P

All true. But what is the shear over Chris? CIMMS says it's in the teens, and my eyes agree. The convection SE of the LLC looks like it's under pretty moderate shear.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#224 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:54 am

AJC3 wrote:
Whoa! Hang on a sec, here. This isn't correct!

If the shear is 25 knots, then it's 25 knots. The shear is the magnitude of a vector difference that is caluclated relative to a base level, and typically these charts uses H85 wind. If storm is moving roughly with the H85 wind, then the shear charts are fairly accurate. If the shear was calculated relative to ground level, then what you would have would be...ahem...250MB windspeed. :P

Now if someone was to look at an H25 isotach chart and say, "hey there's 35 knots of NE wind, that will start to rip away the convection, then you could pose your argument about storm motion.


Hold on...I wasn't speaking of shear in those terms...I was speaking in terms of upper level winds. In other words...if the 300mb winds are 25 knots...etc. I am calling 25 knots of wind over the top of a tropical depression shear. It's less shearing if it is blowing in the same direction as the storm is moving..than if it is moving in the opposite direction. Hence the 250-850 shear maps.

I think the individual knew what I was saying....or I hope. Didn't mean to confuse. It's hard to break habits. When we are in the office...when we talk about shear...there...of course...certain things that are understood....and what you pointed out is one of them.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#225 Postby stormie_skies » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:54 am

southerngale wrote:Yep, she's definitely looking better with all this running on and off stage.



Image



LMAO!! :lol:

Now all we need is an infomercial!

The S2K weight loss program..... how much should we charge? :P


(and by the time we see the end of Chris, I bet we can put this lady in a bikini .... the cash will be rolling in!)
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#226 Postby AJC3 » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:58 am

Air Force Met wrote:
AJC3 wrote:
Whoa! Hang on a sec, here. This isn't correct!

If the shear is 25 knots, then it's 25 knots. The shear is the magnitude of a vector difference that is caluclated relative to a base level, and typically these charts uses H85 wind. If storm is moving roughly with the H85 wind, then the shear charts are fairly accurate. If the shear was calculated relative to ground level, then what you would have would be...ahem...250MB windspeed. :P

Now if someone was to look at an H25 isotach chart and say, "hey there's 35 knots of NE wind, that will start to rip away the convection, then you could pose your argument about storm motion.


Hold on...I wasn't speaking of shear in those terms...I was speaking in terms of upper level winds. In other words...if the 300mb winds are 25 knots...etc. I am calling 25 knots of wind over the top of a tropical depression shear. It's less shearing if it is blowing in the same direction as the storm is moving..than if it is moving in the opposite direction. Hence the 250-850 shear maps.

I think the individual knew what I was saying....or I hope. Didn't mean to confuse. It's hard to break habits. When we are in the office...when we talk about shear...there...of course...certain things that are understood....and what you pointed out is one of them.



Ah. Gotcha. Just wanted people to remember that those shear values are actually computed, subtracting out the low level wind. I checked the CIMSS site again, and it's H70-H925 used as a basline. Sometimes upper level winds and upper level wind shear are used interchangably on here.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#227 Postby AJC3 » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:00 am

curtadams wrote:
AJC3 wrote:If the shear is 25 knots, then it's 25 knots. The shear is the magnitude of a vector difference that is caluclated relative to a base level, and typically these charts uses H85 wind. If storm motion is roughly the same as the H85 wind vector (sans the storm circ itself), then the shear charts are fairly accurate. If the shear was calculated relative to ground level, then what you would have would be...ahem...250MB windspeed. :P

All true. But what is the shear over Chris? CIMMS says it's in the teens, and my eyes agree. The convection SE of the LLC looks like it's under pretty moderate shear.


Oh, I agree with you there. I think we were just hypothesizing what if the higher shear values to the NE came down over the top of Chris.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#228 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:02 am

AJC3 wrote:
Ah. Gotcha. Just wanted people to remember that those shear values are actually computed, subtracting out the low level wind. I checked the CIMSS site again, and it's H70-H925 used as a basline. Sometimes upper level winds and upper level wind shear are used interchangably on here.


Yeah...but I don't look at those charts all the time...especially in real time. I try to look at the raw values when I am just examining a satellite pic.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#229 Postby x-y-no » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:05 am

Can't speak for Josephine96, but I understood what was meant.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#230 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:41 am

Looks like the Fat Lady may have to be put on Life Support if Chris keeps this up.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#231 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:49 am

Air Force Met wrote:
AJC3 wrote:
Ah. Gotcha. Just wanted people to remember that those shear values are actually computed, subtracting out the low level wind. I checked the CIMSS site again, and it's H70-H925 used as a basline. Sometimes upper level winds and upper level wind shear are used interchangably on here.


Yeah...but I don't look at those charts all the time...especially in real time. I try to look at the raw values when I am just examining a satellite pic.


At last we get the 10 round heavyeweight bout between AFM from Texas and AJC3 from Florida. The texas-florida fight to the death match that has been brewing between the texas and florida lightweights for the last couple of hurricane seasons. We have seen people insulted, banned and irritated from both states. This will be the cage match to decide which state is king of the shear map. Go to it and leave it all in the ring.
0 likes   

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2862
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

#232 Postby AnnularCane » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:49 am

The fat lady could use the exercise anyway. She should be thanking Chris. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#233 Postby dixiebreeze » Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:08 pm

AnnularCane wrote:The fat lady could use the exercise anyway. She should be thanking Chris. :lol:


Maria Callas she's not.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38089
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#234 Postby Brent » Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:36 pm

I hope the fat lady knows how to perform CPR...
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
westmoon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:42 am
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Contact:

#235 Postby westmoon » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:18 pm

Fat lady down to 98 pounds!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#236 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:20 pm

She'll be down to skin and bones by Saturday. :D
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#237 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:20 pm

Brent wrote:I hope the fat lady knows how to perform CPR...


Yeah...with the outflow boundry moving through the LLC...gonna need to:

CLEAR

As I said this morning, if something of Chris holds together...and most likley it will be a wave...for another 2 days...it has a real shot of redeveloping....but it has to make it that long either as a TD or a wave.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#238 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:32 pm

oK, WE CAN ALL GO HOME NOW. :D
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1160
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

#239 Postby tgenius » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:34 pm

at 2:30pm, we note for the records that we have a flatlined tropical system #3, better known as Chris. May he rest in peace. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#240 Postby Grease Monkey » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:41 pm

Here's a little goodbye song for Chris:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/music/clipserv ... 33-8047826
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abajan, duilaslol, NotSparta, riapal, Sciencerocks, StormWeather, TomballEd and 50 guests