T.S Ernesto #10 Sat pics, analysis, models thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
T.S Ernesto #10 Sat pics, analysis, models thread
Thread 1 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88466
Thread 2 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88600
Thread 3 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 27&start=0
Thread 4 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 49&start=0
Thread 5 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88695
Thread 6 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 19&start=0
Thread 7 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 44&start=0
Thread 8 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... sc&start=0
Thread 9: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88785
Please continue the discussion here.
Thread 2 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88600
Thread 3 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 27&start=0
Thread 4 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 49&start=0
Thread 5 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88695
Thread 6 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 19&start=0
Thread 7 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 44&start=0
Thread 8 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... sc&start=0
Thread 9: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88785
Please continue the discussion here.
0 likes
Air Force Met wrote:Mac wrote: Uhhh...go back a few posts. You're saying exactly what I said. I stated that the "whispy" appearance on the NW side of the storm was not shear but outflow. So are you just busting my chops for the fun of it, or what? LOL
What part of this are you having trouble with? Did you run the loop will be my first question...
My second is understand that one level...at say 40K feet you can have outflow...but at a lower level...say 25K or 30K you can have shear. That is what we call undercutting shear.
I don't think I am the one that is having difficulty understanding here, AFM. Read my post again. I did not say that Ernie was not encountering shear. I merely pointed out to the poster that the "whispy" appearance on the NW quad of the storm was not shear but outflow...as per several pro mets on the board. You are somehow assuming that statement implies that I was suggesting no shear was present. It seemed to me that the poster was curious about the whispy appearance and whether shear was causing it, as I was curious about this same phenomenon last night. So I explained what had been explained to me by the pro mets. Chill already.
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
From Dr. Jeff Master's morning blog:
He isn't really buying into this strong trough either.
The track forecast
As Ernesto crosses into the Gulf of Mexico on Tuesday, a trough of low pressure will be swinging across the eastern U.S. and should pull the storm on a more northerly track. Most of the models are showing that this trough will be strong enough to bring the storm all the way to the coast between Louisiana and the Florida Panhandle. However, the trough may not be strong enough to do this, and Ernesto could get stuck in the Gulf for a week, potentially heading westwards towards Texas as a new ridge of high pressure builds in. A subsequent trough could then turn the storm northwards into the coast at some later time. The UKMET model and GFS model prefer this solution. At this point, there is not enough information to say which solution is most likely, and residents from Texas to the Florida Keys need to be prepared for this storm to affect them.
He isn't really buying into this strong trough either.
0 likes
I think what adds some creditability to the GFS, GFDL, & NOGAPs model solutions is the ECMWF (Euro). By Friday night, it takes the storm into the Big Bend area of FL.
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts ... uv850_z500
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts ... uv850_z500
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Mac wrote:Air Force Met wrote:Mac wrote: Uhhh...go back a few posts. You're saying exactly what I said. I stated that the "whispy" appearance on the NW side of the storm was not shear but outflow. So are you just busting my chops for the fun of it, or what? LOL
What part of this are you having trouble with? Did you run the loop will be my first question...
My second is understand that one level...at say 40K feet you can have outflow...but at a lower level...say 25K or 30K you can have shear. That is what we call undercutting shear.
I don't think I am the one that is having difficulty understanding here, AFM. Read my post again. I did not say that Ernie was not encountering shear. I merely pointed out to the poster that the "whispy" appearance on the NW quad of the storm was not shear but outflow...as per several pro mets on the board. You are somehow assuming that statement implies that I was suggesting no shear was present. It seemed to me that the poster was curious about the whispy appearance and whether shear was causing it, as I was curious about this same phenomenon last night. So I explained what had been explained to me by the pro mets. Chill already.
Yes boss.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
I didn't have a "selected" interpretation. I was just posting what a Phd holding pro met was saying about the situation and why we shouldn't be so quick to jump on the strong trough bandwagon. Really this could still be anyone's game.dwg71 wrote:But does say Texas to FL Keys... though. EWG your "selected" interpretation is very prevelant. Too Far out to make any land fall predictions.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
I don't know what accuweather is saying as a whole, but according to JB he expects this to be at 92.5W, and 27.5N as a major hurricane next Friday. If you plot this on a map, that would be just offshore TX/LA and if it is heading WNW or NW like he said, it could be a bad situation.Wx_Warrior wrote:Extreme...explain Tx/La offshore....
I did see on Accuwx that it hits as cat 2 on border...
0 likes
Ernie is looking pretty ragged towards end of loop..
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+12
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+12
0 likes
I think the shear may be getting him...dwg71 wrote:Ernie is looking pretty ragged towards end of loop..
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+12
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
dwg71 wrote:Ernie is looking pretty ragged towards end of loop..
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+12
Almost every single source I read says the shear is decreasing and its looking better.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Ernie is looking pretty ragged towards end of loop..
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+12
Ragged? He looks fine to me. He could be going throught the diurnal minimum now.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- cinlfla
- Category 2
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast
Extremeweatherguy wrote:I didn't have a "selected" interpretation. I was just posting what a Phd holding pro met was saying about the situation and why we shouldn't be so quick to jump on the strong trough bandwagon. Really this could still be anyone's game.dwg71 wrote:But does say Texas to FL Keys... though. EWG your "selected" interpretation is very prevelant. Too Far out to make any land fall predictions.
No they've convinced me that the west coast of Florida pretty much has nothing to worry about, especially with there rock solid predictions. Its going to Tx Or LA. I really do not want it to hit anyone but I really do feel bad for the folks in LA and MS if they get nailed by this storm
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Air Force Met wrote:jwayne wrote:afm, what is your read on where this thing is headed late next week? saw you are not really buying into the model depiction of strength of trough. Thanks.
Mid-TX coast to NOLA....heavy emphasis on LA coast.

0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: HurricaneFan, IsabelaWeather, LAF92, Orlando_wx, wileytheartist and 48 guests