
T.S Florence,Analysis,Sat Pics,Models Thread #3
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- BensonTCwatcher
- Category 5
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
- Location: Southport NC
storms in NC wrote:As we All know very well the models will change back and forth for the next 3-5 days.
I do not expect to see a lot of model changes back and forth on Florence.
Like I said earlier there are way too many indications of a "normal" track (if there is such a thing as "normal") for this one.
Climatologically speaking and from the models this one will most likely recurve unless something really radical happens.
Any model back and forth may even show it recurve earlier than the current models show.
I think Ernesto is still very much on our minds and his unpredicatability. But historically the models and Pro Mets don't really miss by much and there is a large margin of error allowable by Florence before it would become a threat to the U.S.
Let's try (and I know it is hard after the last week or so) to not let Ernesto cloud our views of what the models and Pro Mets say. They had a hard time with Ernesto but that is the "exception" not the "rule".
0 likes
- Meso
- Category 5
- Posts: 1609
- Age: 38
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: South Africa
- Contact:
CMC 12z model run at 144 hours Making landfall ummm..er...somewhere up north
UKMET 12z model run at 144 hours It builds quite a strong ridge north of the system
Look at the difference in location of the two models... talk about different speeds...
UKMET 12z model run at 144 hours It builds quite a strong ridge north of the system
Look at the difference in location of the two models... talk about different speeds...
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34090
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Meso wrote:CMC 12z model run at 144 hours Making landfall ummm..er...somewhere up north
UKMET 12z model run at 144 hours It builds quite a strong ridge north of the system
Look at the difference in location of the two models... talk about different speeds...
A Newfoundland landfall as a major hurricane? That would be quite a surprising track, but Luis (1995) did just that...
0 likes
- HurricaneBelle
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
- Location: Clearwater, FL
Meso wrote:CMC 12z model run at 144 hours Making landfall ummm..er...somewhere up north
UKMET 12z model run at 144 hours It builds quite a strong ridge north of the system
Look at the difference in location of the two models... talk about different speeds...
Hmmm....notice that it's the Canadian model taking it into the Maritimes. It must be -removed-!
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34090
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
SouthFloridawx wrote:I think it is too early to be talking about a landfall 7-12 days out. That is just my personal opinion..
True, the margin of error is thousands of miles...the entire Northwest Atlantic is ripe for the taking...
The only thing that can basically be ruled out is the Caribbean Sea.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34090
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
HurricaneBelle wrote:Meso wrote:CMC 12z model run at 144 hours Making landfall ummm..er...somewhere up north
UKMET 12z model run at 144 hours It builds quite a strong ridge north of the system
Look at the difference in location of the two models... talk about different speeds...
Hmmm....notice that it's the Canadian model taking it into the Maritimes. It must be -removed-!
That would make Juan look like an afternoon thunderstorm...that would be easily at least a Category 3, possibly 4, sitting up there...
0 likes
NWS Miami thoughts on Floreance.
FXUS62 KMFL 051833
AFDMFL
AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
233 PM EDT TUE SEP 5 2006
.
THE WEATHER OVER THE CWA EARLY NEXT WEEK WILL DEPEND MOSTLY ON
THE LOCATION AND THE STRENGTHEN OF TROPICAL STORM FLORENCE.
THEREFORE...CHECK FOR THE LATEST INFORMATION FROM THE NHC ON
TROPICAL STORM FLORENCE.
FXUS62 KMFL 051833
AFDMFL
AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
233 PM EDT TUE SEP 5 2006
.
THE WEATHER OVER THE CWA EARLY NEXT WEEK WILL DEPEND MOSTLY ON
THE LOCATION AND THE STRENGTHEN OF TROPICAL STORM FLORENCE.
THEREFORE...CHECK FOR THE LATEST INFORMATION FROM THE NHC ON
TROPICAL STORM FLORENCE.
0 likes
- MortisFL
- Category 1
- Posts: 391
- Age: 42
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:01 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
gatorcane wrote:I think out of the two systems we have 91L has the higher chance of landfalling probability - my eyes are fociusing on 91L as it moves Westward at 10 mph
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=89296
Gator, just sit back and analyze the storm without making a landfall prediction in every post.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests