double D wrote:
What I should have said is that the pattern across Texas looked more progressive than the last cold outbreak, but you bring up a good point about the surface features being handled poorly by the gfs. I guess it's hard to get a sense of the depth of cold because the GFS handles arctic air masses so poorly.
Yeah, that's precisely my point. I see the 12Z GFS shows tremendous cross-Polar flow and builds a 1014mb high? Something's not right there. Just last week, the GFS was predicting a 1050+ mb high dropping down the Rockies/Plains states next week. Now it's lost.