Blown_away wrote:Can we say with high confidence at this point that what ever becomes of 99L, it will generally move W and not be a threat to FL.
I would say that right now. who knows at this time where it is going to go.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Blown_away wrote:Can we say with high confidence at this point that what ever becomes of 99L, it will generally move W and not be a threat to FL.
El Nino wrote:88 kts at D5 !!!
canegrl04 wrote:vaffie wrote:1005.8 mb pressure reported by recon.
A TD? Between this thing,and the one in the GOM, we may have a tag team of Dean and Erin
jrod wrote:I am still convinced it is an open wave. While it does have strong winds, which squalls are capable of producing Im not going to believe there are any west winds unless the recon flight proves otherwise. The pressure is low enough to keep this thing alive and it may be trying to pull together. At the 5 pm advisory I expect at most a tropical disturbance statement.
wxman57 wrote:I agree, no evidence of a TD yet. If that 1002.7mb pressure were real with pressures 1010-1011 all around it, winds would be above TS force. But recon keeps reporting light and variable.
wxman57 wrote:jrod wrote:I am still convinced it is an open wave. While it does have strong winds, which squalls are capable of producing Im not going to believe there are any west winds unless the recon flight proves otherwise. The pressure is low enough to keep this thing alive and it may be trying to pull together. At the 5 pm advisory I expect at most a tropical disturbance statement.
I agree, no evidence of a TD yet. If that 1002.7mb pressure were real with pressures 1010-1011 all around it, winds would be above TS force. But recon keeps reporting light and variable.
Cyclenall wrote:canegrl04 wrote:vaffie wrote:1005.8 mb pressure reported by recon.
A TD? Between this thing,and the one in the GOM, we may have a tag team of Dean and Erin
I just thought of something...remember Bonnie and Charley?![]()
I can't even keep up with all this reading. I must have read a 250 page book's worth of reading in less then 5 hours from all these threads.
Derek Ortt wrote:not a TD based upon the data
Users browsing this forum: redingtonbeach and 45 guests