Global Models for 90L
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- KFDM Meteorologist
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County
Re:
CMC or whatever that model is looks crazy turning that north into the ridge.RL3AO wrote:CMC goes north.
0 likes
Re: Global Models for 90L
To the untrained eye 90L looks like the first CV (perhaps the first in the Atl period) to have all the characteristics of a TD/TS... doesn't this have some bearing over all models as far as development for now?
0 likes
Re: Global Models for 90L
The GFDL did a similar thing on a run that occurred 12 hours before the TD that became Ernesto was classified. Jeff Masters posted an email from one of the GFDL creators on what happened
(source)
No telling if the same thing happened in this case, but it was probably similar and not much should be read into it.
The vortex initialized from our initialization was very weak as the initialization process spins up the storm to match the observed initial winds. Since the easterlies in the lower level were very strong in the GFS analysis, it initialized a disturbance with very weak vorticity.
As you can see at hour 0 there was almost no circulation initially. As a result, our grid movement shut down at 3 hours and the inner nests could no longer follow the storm for the rest of the forecast.
The previous runs also had a very weak initial disturbance but there was enough of a pressure gradient that the inner nests continued to follow the vortex and eventually with the high resolution it developed into a significant tropical cyclone.
In the 6z run, the weak disturbance moved out of the high resolution inner grid, into the coarse resolution, and so all we had left was a very weak disturbance that could not be resolved in the coarse outer mesh.
(source)
No telling if the same thing happened in this case, but it was probably similar and not much should be read into it.
0 likes
Re: Global Models for 90L
clfenwi wrote:The GFDL did a similar thing on a run that occurred 12 hours before the TD that became Ernesto was classified. Jeff Masters posted an email from one of the GFDL creators on what happenedThe vortex initialized from our initialization was very weak as the initialization process spins up the storm to match the observed initial winds. Since the easterlies in the lower level were very strong in the GFS analysis, it initialized a disturbance with very weak vorticity.
As you can see at hour 0 there was almost no circulation initially. As a result, our grid movement shut down at 3 hours and the inner nests could no longer follow the storm for the rest of the forecast.
The previous runs also had a very weak initial disturbance but there was enough of a pressure gradient that the inner nests continued to follow the vortex and eventually with the high resolution it developed into a significant tropical cyclone.
In the 6z run, the weak disturbance moved out of the high resolution inner grid, into the coarse resolution, and so all we had left was a very weak disturbance that could not be resolved in the coarse outer mesh.
(source)
No telling if the same thing happened in this case, but it was probably similar and not much should be read into it.
This is a particular case in which I believe we can argue for the strength of neural networks over that of state machines...
0 likes
Re:
Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.
So are you banking on the models and agreeing that this storm will be dead on arrival? I am willing to place a pretty large wager that you would be wrong with the models on that one.
0 likes
Re:
Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.
It's most likely a glitch since the model didn't even initialize anything even though this is most likely a TD right now. I highly doubt the model would dump the system like that so rapidly out of nowhere. I was wondering if the fact that it's not a TD officially will affect the models too much even though it could be one right now?
I think the HWRF was a bit late, and it shows a hurricane still. This further makes me believe the latest GFDL run was garbage.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38106
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re:
Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.
Not this again...
and the Euro run was 12 hours ago, let's see what the 0z shows.
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: Re:
yeah, plus I wouldn't really call the EURO "reliable" when it comes to tropical cyclones. Upper-level condition, yes..but tropical storms and hurricanes...no.Brent wrote:Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.
Not this again...
and the Euro run was 12 hours ago, let's see what the 0z shows.
0 likes
Re: Global Models for 90L
00Z HWRF did not drop it.
Interesting to compare the initial conditions of the HWRF compared to the GFDL. The HWRF started with a minimum pressure of 1006 millibars, which just so happens to match the pressure that was reported in the TWD. On the other hand, the GFDL started with a pressure of 1010 millibars. That under-initialization is probably what caused the GFDL to lose the disturbance.
Interesting to compare the initial conditions of the HWRF compared to the GFDL. The HWRF started with a minimum pressure of 1006 millibars, which just so happens to match the pressure that was reported in the TWD. On the other hand, the GFDL started with a pressure of 1010 millibars. That under-initialization is probably what caused the GFDL to lose the disturbance.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38106
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Global Models for 90L
clfenwi wrote:00Z HWRF did not drop it.
Interesting to compare the initial conditions of the HWRF compared to the GFDL. The HWRF started with a minimum pressure of 1006 millibars, which just so happens to match the pressure that was reported in the TWD. On the other hand, the GFDL started with a pressure of 1010 millibars. That under-initialization is probably what caused the GFDL to lose the disturbance.
and still shows a hurricane for the islands.
I think you're right about the different initializations in intensity.
0 likes
- KFDM Meteorologist
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County
Re: Global Models for 90L
Please post it when it comes out. I have to sleep now and will look at it tomorrow morning..LOL
0 likes
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:35 pm
- Location: Central Florida
Re: Global Models for 90L
EURO is slower then the GFS with this storm and further North . btw, Here is a a nice read about model verification for the 2006 hurricane season.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pd ... n_2006.pdf
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pd ... n_2006.pdf
0 likes
Re: Global Models for 90L
The 00Z WRF run has the same exact speed as the previous two runs--reaching 62W at 18Z on 17 August, but is much further south at that point at 14.4N (vs 15.8N and 15.3N) and stronger at 971 mb (vs 990 and 980)
.
.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests