Global Models for 90L

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#361 Postby RL3AO » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:15 am

Defiantly a weird run.
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

Re:

#362 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:15 am

RL3AO wrote:CMC goes north.
CMC or whatever that model is looks crazy turning that north into the ridge.
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re: Global Models for 90L

#363 Postby mgpetre » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:19 am

To the untrained eye 90L looks like the first CV (perhaps the first in the Atl period) to have all the characteristics of a TD/TS... doesn't this have some bearing over all models as far as development for now?
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: Global Models for 90L

#364 Postby clfenwi » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:21 am

The GFDL did a similar thing on a run that occurred 12 hours before the TD that became Ernesto was classified. Jeff Masters posted an email from one of the GFDL creators on what happened

The vortex initialized from our initialization was very weak as the initialization process spins up the storm to match the observed initial winds. Since the easterlies in the lower level were very strong in the GFS analysis, it initialized a disturbance with very weak vorticity.

As you can see at hour 0 there was almost no circulation initially. As a result, our grid movement shut down at 3 hours and the inner nests could no longer follow the storm for the rest of the forecast.

The previous runs also had a very weak initial disturbance but there was enough of a pressure gradient that the inner nests continued to follow the vortex and eventually with the high resolution it developed into a significant tropical cyclone.

In the 6z run, the weak disturbance moved out of the high resolution inner grid, into the coarse resolution, and so all we had left was a very weak disturbance that could not be resolved in the coarse outer mesh.


(source)

No telling if the same thing happened in this case, but it was probably similar and not much should be read into it.
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re: Global Models for 90L

#365 Postby mgpetre » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:24 am

clfenwi wrote:The GFDL did a similar thing on a run that occurred 12 hours before the TD that became Ernesto was classified. Jeff Masters posted an email from one of the GFDL creators on what happened

The vortex initialized from our initialization was very weak as the initialization process spins up the storm to match the observed initial winds. Since the easterlies in the lower level were very strong in the GFS analysis, it initialized a disturbance with very weak vorticity.

As you can see at hour 0 there was almost no circulation initially. As a result, our grid movement shut down at 3 hours and the inner nests could no longer follow the storm for the rest of the forecast.

The previous runs also had a very weak initial disturbance but there was enough of a pressure gradient that the inner nests continued to follow the vortex and eventually with the high resolution it developed into a significant tropical cyclone.

In the 6z run, the weak disturbance moved out of the high resolution inner grid, into the coarse resolution, and so all we had left was a very weak disturbance that could not be resolved in the coarse outer mesh.


(source)

No telling if the same thing happened in this case, but it was probably similar and not much should be read into it.


This is a particular case in which I believe we can argue for the strength of neural networks over that of state machines...
0 likes   

Scorpion

#366 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:24 am

I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re:

#367 Postby mgpetre » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:26 am

Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.


So are you banking on the models and agreeing that this storm will be dead on arrival? I am willing to place a pretty large wager that you would be wrong with the models on that one.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re:

#368 Postby Cyclenall » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.

It's most likely a glitch since the model didn't even initialize anything even though this is most likely a TD right now. I highly doubt the model would dump the system like that so rapidly out of nowhere. I was wondering if the fact that it's not a TD officially will affect the models too much even though it could be one right now?

I think the HWRF was a bit late, and it shows a hurricane still. This further makes me believe the latest GFDL run was garbage.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38106
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#369 Postby Brent » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:33 am

Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.


Not this again...

and the Euro run was 12 hours ago, let's see what the 0z shows.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Re:

#370 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:35 am

Brent wrote:
Scorpion wrote:I'm not buying into any of these excuses... when two very notable models all of a sudden drop a system they do so for a reason.


Not this again...

and the Euro run was 12 hours ago, let's see what the 0z shows.
yeah, plus I wouldn't really call the EURO "reliable" when it comes to tropical cyclones. Upper-level condition, yes..but tropical storms and hurricanes...no.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: Global Models for 90L

#371 Postby clfenwi » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:36 am

00Z HWRF did not drop it.

Interesting to compare the initial conditions of the HWRF compared to the GFDL. The HWRF started with a minimum pressure of 1006 millibars, which just so happens to match the pressure that was reported in the TWD. On the other hand, the GFDL started with a pressure of 1010 millibars. That under-initialization is probably what caused the GFDL to lose the disturbance.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38106
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Global Models for 90L

#372 Postby Brent » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:40 am

clfenwi wrote:00Z HWRF did not drop it.

Interesting to compare the initial conditions of the HWRF compared to the GFDL. The HWRF started with a minimum pressure of 1006 millibars, which just so happens to match the pressure that was reported in the TWD. On the other hand, the GFDL started with a pressure of 1010 millibars. That under-initialization is probably what caused the GFDL to lose the disturbance.


and still shows a hurricane for the islands.

I think you're right about the different initializations in intensity.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#373 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:42 am

The Euro should be coming out soon... the results should be very foreboding on the future of this system
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re: Global Models for 90L

#374 Postby Vortex » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:50 am

when will the EURO be out???
0 likes   

Scorpion

Re: Global Models for 90L

#375 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:52 am

I believe it comes out around 3:30
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

Re: Global Models for 90L

#376 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:55 am

Please post it when it comes out. I have to sleep now and will look at it tomorrow morning..LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#377 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:21 am

Well well well...

Image

Weak system, continues the trend of weaker.
And a second system in the open Atlantic.

500mb shows ridge to the north which will allow this to move into the GOM, extrapolating past 240hr.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#378 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:22 am

At least it develops it this time.. last run just killed it off
0 likes   

flwxwatcher
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 926
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Central Florida

Re: Global Models for 90L

#379 Postby flwxwatcher » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:11 am

EURO is slower then the GFS with this storm and further North . btw, Here is a a nice read about model verification for the 2006 hurricane season.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pd ... n_2006.pdf
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Global Models for 90L

#380 Postby vaffie » Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:40 am

The 00Z WRF run has the same exact speed as the previous two runs--reaching 62W at 18Z on 17 August, but is much further south at that point at 14.4N (vs 15.8N and 15.3N) and stronger at 971 mb (vs 990 and 980)

.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests