RL3AO wrote:I do want to add they were 1500m higher than with Gustav. But I think the NHC made the correct call.
Sorry, didn't notice that.



Moderator: S2k Moderators
RL3AO wrote:I do want to add they were 1500m higher than with Gustav. But I think the NHC made the correct call.
LarryWx wrote:wxman57 wrote:It appears to have stalled on latest satellite loops.
The furthest east point remains very important. Personally, I'd like to see a couple more hours of looping vis. photos before I can be confident this has actually stalled. The floater currently goes through 19:45 Z. Up until about 18:45 Z, it was still moving ENE at a decent clip per my eyes. Since then, it appears to have possibly slowed or stopped, but I'm not yet sure. Regardless, it is already as far east as ~70.3 W, which itself is a good bit further east than the furthest east on almost all 12Z global model runs outside of the GFS and GFDL. IF (still a big if imho) it has reached its furthest east position, then the 12Z GFS's furthest east point of 70.0 W will look excellent though the GFDL's 69.3 W would be too far east.
Just the ramblings of a mad scientist, but I think we should focus on track now. A 1005 mb low over warm water with ridging in place should be a slam dunk, so lets eliminate the variable of "if" and talk about "where".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests