Bane wrote:i think bams are relatively useless at mid latitudes, or that is what has been said iin the past.
Not being sarcastic here but I hear all the time that the BAMS are useless here and useless there.
When are they useful?

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Bane wrote:i think bams are relatively useless at mid latitudes, or that is what has been said iin the past.
fci wrote:Bane wrote:i think bams are relatively useless at mid latitudes, or that is what has been said iin the past.
Not being sarcastic here but I hear all the time that the BAMS are useless here and useless there.
When are they useful?
miamicanes177 wrote:I agree. Accuweather is nailing this thing. They deserve high praise if their forecast verifies. Some professionals backed off their original idea of development based on what happened yesterday. Accuweather gave a forecast, not a nowcast. They had the foresight to see improving conditions when others were simply saying it was dieing. Major props to the Accuweather Meteorologist on 99L...or as they called it, "soon to be Gabrielle".OuterBanker wrote:Hmmm. Lots of JB and Accuweather bashing last night. JB in his post last night abandoned the Euro because it weakened 99l. He stood his ground last night and still declared a sub 970 hurricane at landfall, he stated that the conditions were there. He was not changing his predictions.
A bit stubborn as always, but he believes in what he says right or wrong and does admit when he's wrong.
The bashers are always ready to discredit him a the drop of a hat. Yet very slow to give credit if at all.
Me, I just think it's good to see someone stand thier ground in this day and age.
I'm thinking there's gonna be alot of crow served soon, maybe JB should serve it.
Derek Ortt wrote:looks like I was too soon to question myself
The UL is getting out of the way and outflow is expanding
Figures this happens... I was planning to watch ND tomorrow night
cycloneye wrote:07/1445 UTC 29.5N 69.6W T2.0/2.0 99L -- Atlantic Ocean
They updated the data at 14:45 UTC.
Why the personal attack? I would have no reason to disappear if Accuweather was wrong.fci wrote:Personally, I suspect you would just disappear.......
miamicanes177 wrote:Why the personal attack? I would have no reason to disappear if Accuweather was wrong.fci wrote:Personally, I suspect you would just disappear.......
Derek Ortt wrote:looks like I was too soon to question myself
The UL is getting out of the way and outflow is expanding
Figures this happens... I was planning to watch ND tomorrow night
Chacor wrote:DVORAK NUMBERS AREN'T EVERYTHING.
The NHC will NOT upgrade based on a single set of Dvorak numbers without good reason. SAB is only one of two agencies who do Dvorak fixes, and as we saw with Chantal the NHC does often ignore SAB's fixes.
miamicanes177 wrote:Why the personal attack? I would have no reason to disappear if Accuweather was wrong.fci wrote:Personally, I suspect you would just disappear.......
tolakram wrote:That outflow boundary became a feeder band of sorts. Finally they moved the floater.
This thing is getting serious.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest