Tropical Depression TEN: Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1481 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:10 pm

When they (NHC) mean broad they mean "BROAD" circulation.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-avn.html
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1482 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:10 pm

recon found what MOST of here knew... (at least those not on my ignore list... I saw some of those posts via quotes and I needed some comic relief after reading about Eliasen-Palm fluxes today) this does no have tropical characteristics and is just an ordinary gale center
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1483 Postby Nimbus » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:11 pm

Hasn't changed much since this morning no surprise.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42022

Pressure is still down around 1007 MB.

moving west or WNW makes sense.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42003
Last edited by Nimbus on Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

dtrain44
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:45 am
Location: Norman, OK

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1484 Postby dtrain44 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:11 pm

I agree with Miamicanes. Even though the recon isn't going to change the picture radically, it can't hurt to get all the information possible. I don't think anyone's going to disagree with that. Of course, the cost-benefit analysis of whether th run the plane still has to happen, but I think the NHC wants to keep a very close eye on this. It's been horribly disorganized for the last three days and the NHC has still been warning people to watch the system closely in official products. They're erring on the side of caution and they're right to do so.

How strong can a subtropical system really get? I'm not too familiar with how ST cyclones intensify or what the general bounds on their intensity can be.

Edit: I know there's no subtropical depression or storm out there yet, but I'm wondering about the question in a theoretical sense.
Last edited by dtrain44 on Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1485 Postby miamicanes177 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:12 pm

Vortex data message issued and shows 1005mb extrap
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#1486 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:12 pm

000
URNT12 KNHC 202004
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE AL102007
A. 20/19:32:10Z
B. 26 deg 52 min N
084 deg 14 min W
C. NA mb NA m
D. 18 kt
E. 082 deg 13 nm
F. 131 deg 011 kt
G. 095 deg 021 nm
H. EXTRAP 1005 mb
I. 24 C/ 249 m
J. 24 C/ 249 m
K. 22 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 134/1
O. 0.02 / 5 nm
P. AF306 02IIA INVEST OB 10
MAX FL WIND 16 KT NW QUAD 19:50:00 Z
SLP EXTRAP FROM 1500 FT.


16 kt? :D
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1487 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:13 pm

It has 24/24/22C - that looks tropical to me...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1488 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 pm

might not be a warm core above that though
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1489 Postby Portastorm » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 pm

Pardon me for what may be a stupid question ... but do we know at what speed and compass heading the "broad" low is moving?
0 likes   

BrSpinDoc
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:22 pm

Re: INVEST 93L: Eastern Gulf : Discussions & Images

#1490 Postby BrSpinDoc » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:15 pm

Puddinhead wrote:
jhamps10 wrote:
Puddinhead wrote:So I'm guessing what everyone's saying is I shouldn't count on my family and I spending this weekend in the FEMA trailer in my front yard here in New Orleans....

:wink:


well, I wouldn't count on it right now no.

Next you'll tell me not to figure on driving down to Houma for my sons' high school football game tomorrow night, either....

LOL


Nah. Go ahead and go. Just bring wet weather gear!!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

Re:

#1491 Postby Agua » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:15 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Latest:

Image


Thankfully, it looks pathetic.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1492 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:16 pm

Portastorm wrote:Pardon me for what may be a stupid question ... but do we know at what speed and compass heading the "broad" low is moving?


WNW according to the NHC.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1493 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:18 pm

Hidden in the vortex message: AL102007
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#1494 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:19 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Hidden in the vortex message: AL102007


If I remember from earlier this season, that doesn't mean much.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#1495 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:20 pm

RL3AO wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Hidden in the vortex message: AL102007


If I remember from earlier this season, that doesn't mean much.


I thought the "10" meant storm #10?
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re: INVEST 93L: Eastern Gulf : Discussions & Images

#1496 Postby jhamps10 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:21 pm

tailgater wrote:
ronjon wrote:Quickscat showing well-defined circulation center that is tighter than what I can find on RAD or SAT. Wind barbs north and south of cc at 45 kts. Some increase in convection late this afternoon. Could see some gradual deepening tonight.

It's there, I had to look pretty hard to find it but, I sped up the Vis loop and there it was @26.85 N and 84.5 west


very close call on your guess. .3 north, and .4 east of your pick. Congrats!
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#1497 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:21 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Hidden in the vortex message: AL102007


If I remember from earlier this season, that doesn't mean much.


I thought the "10" meant storm #10?


It does, but I think that happened earlier this year after a VDM said AL062007 or something but it was kept an invest. Or maybe the VDM gives it the next storm number...or maybe they are upgrading it.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1498 Postby Coredesat » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:24 pm

As far as I know, that number does not mean anything since the NHC didn't assign it. From the way it looks, the system has a very weak warm core, but it may be cold core above flight level. I agree with Derek's assessment.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#1499 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:25 pm

Yeah. Think about it this way. The NHC would upgrade it to 10L after receiving the VDM not before.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: 93L: Special Tropical Disturbance Statement at page 74

#1500 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:26 pm

I doubt an upgrade an hour after a STDS saying it wasn't organized enough to be a Sub-Tropical Depression unless recon discovered something amazing.


I still think it was a good thing recon went, at the very least won't the 0Z models have data picked fresh from the farm?
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests