Yes, very true - some don't realize that in 2005, had it not been for a mid-Atlantic trough, many could have been exposed to an additonal 5-8 tropical storms or hurricanes, so, it's true that it's not correct to compare any other season (except for 1933, perhaps) with 2005...
As you said, current conditions might change, or the TUTT feature might remain for the rest of the season, but, for each week that passes, it becomes less likely that conditions will become more tranquil (at least for hurricanes, since, bullies though they are, they require tranquil conditions for them to thrive)...
Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- DanKellFla
- Category 5
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:02 pm
- Location: Lake Worth, Florida
- Category 5
- Category 5
- Posts: 10074
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, NJ
- Contact:
Re:
hurricanetrack wrote:Here it is:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/storm/cont ... _0930.html
I see three badly predicted seasons:
2005, 2006 and 2007.
Think long and hard about 2005....
It's all been a wake up call to just how little we know, and how unpredictable the tropics can be. Thats what makes it intresting.
0 likes
Re: Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
Personally, I am tired of the claims that this season is "dull". Lately, the post-2005 generation seems to expect an intense hurricane striking the United States every year as the norm. I think more people should have conversed with the (now gone) John Hope and other veteran experts. Face the reality: overall, a major hurricane landfall (singular event!) is an unusual event in any given year. The ridiculous concentration of hurricane landfalls (especially +Category 3) in the United States during 2003-2005 was nearly unprecedented by all standards. Additionally, I don't consider 2007 a "dull" year even for the United States. Humberto certainly wasn't a Katrina or Andrew (insert intense landfalling hurricane here), but you should tell that fact to the people in SE Texas. The pre-shore intensification rate was incredible by all accounts. Don't forget Erin, too - it actually strengthened to a possible TS/STS over land in OK, where it caused TS force gusts and heavy precipitation. Please stop the doom and gloom hype (it's a pre-2004 fad), and don't dismiss the potential impacts of some "less consequential" systems.
Secondly, we have forgotten that the "lowly" storms (i.e. those forgettable tropical storms and TD 10 reduxes) make up the "bulk" of most seasons, including above average years. In fact, history indicates that many seasons (including all seasons from 1995-2007) may not have reached their final totals without the "distributor" systems. I'm talking about the fishy tropical storms and abundant weak systems. We tend to focus on the landfalls, hurricanes, and intense storms, but we overlook the Arlenes, Lees, and TD 10 copy cats that really boost those seasonal final numbers. If you don't believe me, check your tropical history in the NOAA best track database, Monthly Weather Review, and other good sources for historical climatology (including recent seasons). 2007 may have featured more short-lived tropical storms, and the higher shear is unusual in a Nina year, but the basic premise remains the same: the abundance of weaker systems (relative to hurricanes and intense storms) is relatively normal in most seasons!
This has been reiterated in other posts, but two Category 5 hurricanes in a single year is astounding, especially when you consider the fact that they made landfall at that rare intensity. Dean and Felix actually intensified prior to their landfalls in Mexico and Nicaragua. If you think 2006 and 2007 have been infested with shear, look back at 1997 (strong El Nino year). We saw eight named systems (fewer than '06) and +50 kts of shear in the Caribbean during the season's peak! Additionally, the '70s, '80s, and early '90s would completely kill this tropical-oriented board today. The majority of those decades featured very few United States landfalls, while most seasons featured totals below 9 NS. Finally, 13 NS (by October 1) is extremely impressive; while I don't expect more than 16 NS, we could certainly see two more systems in this La Nina year. Weak systems may seem insignificant, but they still count for the totals (ask the true renowned experts at the NHC - don't bash them).
I'm voicing a view contrary to the majority, but I wasn't deeply affected by the slow '06 year and '07 "lull".
Secondly, we have forgotten that the "lowly" storms (i.e. those forgettable tropical storms and TD 10 reduxes) make up the "bulk" of most seasons, including above average years. In fact, history indicates that many seasons (including all seasons from 1995-2007) may not have reached their final totals without the "distributor" systems. I'm talking about the fishy tropical storms and abundant weak systems. We tend to focus on the landfalls, hurricanes, and intense storms, but we overlook the Arlenes, Lees, and TD 10 copy cats that really boost those seasonal final numbers. If you don't believe me, check your tropical history in the NOAA best track database, Monthly Weather Review, and other good sources for historical climatology (including recent seasons). 2007 may have featured more short-lived tropical storms, and the higher shear is unusual in a Nina year, but the basic premise remains the same: the abundance of weaker systems (relative to hurricanes and intense storms) is relatively normal in most seasons!
This has been reiterated in other posts, but two Category 5 hurricanes in a single year is astounding, especially when you consider the fact that they made landfall at that rare intensity. Dean and Felix actually intensified prior to their landfalls in Mexico and Nicaragua. If you think 2006 and 2007 have been infested with shear, look back at 1997 (strong El Nino year). We saw eight named systems (fewer than '06) and +50 kts of shear in the Caribbean during the season's peak! Additionally, the '70s, '80s, and early '90s would completely kill this tropical-oriented board today. The majority of those decades featured very few United States landfalls, while most seasons featured totals below 9 NS. Finally, 13 NS (by October 1) is extremely impressive; while I don't expect more than 16 NS, we could certainly see two more systems in this La Nina year. Weak systems may seem insignificant, but they still count for the totals (ask the true renowned experts at the NHC - don't bash them).
I'm voicing a view contrary to the majority, but I wasn't deeply affected by the slow '06 year and '07 "lull".
0 likes
Re: Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
By the way, my post wasn't an attempt to insult Frank2 and others who believe the season is finished. I appreciate their input, too. I was merely adding some perspective to recent posts.
-Miami
-Miami
0 likes
Re: Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
I think you are ignoring the dryness of these marginal storms. It's one thing to say numbers count, but when people say rain is the problem with lower intensity storms and they don't even have that you have to start admitting this isn't a normal year.
0 likes
Re: Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
Good year for weak systems to form and be destroyed. That is about all. I'm not forgetting about the ones that do and have made it big,. But it is interesting that "most" of them waited intill very close to the coast. Interesting.
0 likes
Re: Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
2005 was an active season and it should be in its own category. 2007 is different from 2005.
0 likes
Re: Unexpected Strong Shear (News Item)
Per what Derek said, this is why NOAA's public forecast at the beginning of the season, needs to be taken with the understanding that they consider the totals for the entire basin (which ranges from the Panama Canal Zone to Portugal) - not just for systems that affect the United States...
So, while thankfully it has been a North America season (so far) without landfalling hurricanes (except for a short-fused Hurricane Lorenzo), the Carribbean has been busy, in as far as it seeing two Category 5 hurricanes pass through that region...
Still, I disagree at the totals - while we have had 13 named systems, only two were major hurricanes, while two others were short-lived (< 12 h) hurricanes, with the remainder being sheared tropical storms or depressions, so, it's fair to say it's been an uneven (not unfair, just uneven) kind of season...
Incidentially, hopefully I would never say it is (or was) a dull season - it'd be pretty dull of me to say something like that...
LOL
So, while thankfully it has been a North America season (so far) without landfalling hurricanes (except for a short-fused Hurricane Lorenzo), the Carribbean has been busy, in as far as it seeing two Category 5 hurricanes pass through that region...
Still, I disagree at the totals - while we have had 13 named systems, only two were major hurricanes, while two others were short-lived (< 12 h) hurricanes, with the remainder being sheared tropical storms or depressions, so, it's fair to say it's been an uneven (not unfair, just uneven) kind of season...
Incidentially, hopefully I would never say it is (or was) a dull season - it'd be pretty dull of me to say something like that...
LOL
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: chaser1, hurricanes1234, IsabelaWeather, riapal and 35 guests