INVEST 92L: Bahamas : Gone fron NRL

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : No Recon Today nor overnight

#521 Postby Normandy » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:53 am

Look stormcenter I don't want to get off topic here, but honestly Masters is not over-hyping this situation. The potential IS there for this to become a potent storm, and it does have model support. All meteorological factors point to this system developing....will it for sure? No....will it likely develop? Yes....and if it does it won't exactly encounter hostile conditions for deepening. All of this + model support point to the formation of a TC, which merits concern.

If Master's over-hyped this situation, then you are guilty of under-hyping it.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : No Recon Today nor overnight

#522 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:56 am

Normandy wrote:Look stormcenter I don't want to get off topic here, but honestly Masters is not over-hyping this situation. The potential IS there for this to become a potent storm, and it does have model support. All meteorological factors point to this system developing....will it for sure? No....will it likely develop? Yes....and if it does it won't exactly encounter hostile conditions for deepening. All of this + model support point to the formation of a TC, which merits concern.

If Master's over-hyped this situation, then you are guilty of under-hyping it.


Your points are well taken and as I always say "We shall see". Thanks for the replies.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#523 Postby MGC » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:00 am

Rather disorganized this morning....doubt anything happens until it reaches the NW Carb....MGC
0 likes   

mightyerick

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#524 Postby mightyerick » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:03 am

Stormcenetr.... do you think that if the center reforms far south, like between Cuba and Jamaica, the chances of developing will increase or they will fall down???
0 likes   

User avatar
stormchazer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2461
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Contact:

#525 Postby stormchazer » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:12 am

Stormcenter, I am not sure if this will become anything or not, but are you suggesting that Dr Master's and his Doctorate do not carry some validity in this discussion? I really did not see him hyping anything, just offering his expert opinion of the situation.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#526 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:19 am

I am a little less impressed with thw ahcnaces for development this morning. The upper ridge is a little smaller than expected (not a surprise since the models cannot forecats shear to save their lives) and no concentrated low is forming.

maybe soemthing will start to get going on Sunday in the Carib... but now I am only giving this aa 20-30% chance of developing (down from about 40 yesterday)
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#527 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:25 am

stormchazer wrote:Stormcenter, I am not sure if this will become anything or not, but are you suggesting that Dr Master's and his Doctorate do not carry some validity in this discussion? I really did not see him hyping anything, just offering his expert opinion of the situation.


As I stated before I really do like his posts and do not question his knowledge.
Who am I to anyway? I only questioned his belief that 92L would become a hurricane
based on what is out there right now which to be honest with you was more impressive looking yesterday as will all can agree to. Hey look even the NHC agrees with me. They don't even mention it becoming a TD anymore. Yes I know things can change but as of now I don't see 92L's future as impressively as Mr. Masters. Hey its just my opinion of the current situation.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#528 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:31 am

:uarrow: There you have the 12z GFS run.Any comments about it? Front does not get it.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#529 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:44 am

I'm starting to agree with derek ortt on this one. The shear is just causing all heck on all systems this year. I'm not saying we could not have a few more sheared systems this year, and I'm not saying this could not develop into one of them. But don't think this will be very big.
0 likes   

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2146
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#530 Postby Steve H. » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:47 am

12Z Canadien has 92L cut SW across the tip of Florida, then to New Orleans (or thereabouts) as a cane. It shows another low form and landfall in that same area on the 10th :roll: I think the models are really struggling to get a handle on the shear component (humanizing the models!), but at 48-96 hours, it seems that shear in the basin decreases significantly. We'll see. Right now none of the lows can get their act together, and the GFS shows nothing of significance out to day 10. Give it a few days and we'll see if the upper levels settle down.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#531 Postby wxman57 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:48 am

Stormcenter wrote:
stormchazer wrote:Stormcenter, I am not sure if this will become anything or not, but are you suggesting that Dr Master's and his Doctorate do not carry some validity in this discussion? I really did not see him hyping anything, just offering his expert opinion of the situation.


As I stated before I really do like his posts and do not question his knowledge.
Who am I to anyway? I only questioned his belief that 92L would become a hurricane
based on what is out there right now which to be honest with you was more impressive looking yesterday as will all can agree to. Hey look even the NHC agrees with me. They don't even mention it becoming a TD anymore. Yes I know things can change but as of now I don't see 92L's future as impressively as Mr. Masters. Hey its just my opinion of the current situation.


Just remember that the NHC is only looking out through tomorrow when they talk about development. They don't provide a 3-5 day (or 7-day) discussion of potential development. If they did, then they'd probably mention a chance that this disturbance could become a hurricane. As I've said, it won't have much chance of developing until it reaches near western Cuba in the NW Caribbean/Yucatan Channel. Once there, it appears that upper-level winds may be quite favorable for development/intensification. You're putting too much emphasis on what it looks like today, which really doesn't matter. High pressure to its northwest is producing too much shear for at least the next 48-72 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#532 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:58 am

Agree 57,that if any development occurs here,it will be in the NW Caribbean and not near the Bahamas area.
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5075
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: INVEST 92L : Near Bahamas : Discussions & Images

#533 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:01 pm

TAFB 72 hour surface forecast:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
With 96 hour position of 92L just north of the Yucatan as a possible tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#534 Postby hurricanetrack » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:04 pm

Sorry for the one-liner, but it is at least appropriate to this situation:

and so we wait...
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#535 Postby fci » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:07 pm

I am also a devotee of climatology and direct much of my thinking in that direction unless there is something compelling to adjust that thought process.

In the case of 92L, the fact that wxman57 and Derek are bullish on its development leans me towards eskewing climatology. However, the prospects for this to be a Carib development and NOT the Bahamas fits climatology a whole lot more.

A development in the Bahamas tracking SW ACROSS Cuba from the Northeast is way contrary to climatology and I discounted that possibility even though Pros mentioned it.

If this consolidates south of Cuba, it makes total sense to me and my leanings towards climatology.

As for Dr. Masters; I treat what he says with the respect that I give to ALL Pro Mets; even JB.

JB is whole subject on his own and is a lightning rod here I think because of the reverence that some pay him; like he is a genie and knows all. He is wrong like most Pro's and proabably as consistently as other Pro Mets are apt to be in this imperfect, unpredictable science.
0 likes   

HURRICANELONNY
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL

#536 Postby HURRICANELONNY » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:08 pm

I still can't get why everyone is looking at the model runs when nothing has formed. :double:
0 likes   

chadtm80

Re:

#537 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:12 pm

HURRICANELONNY wrote:I still can't get why everyone is looking at the model runs when nothing has formed. :double:

For Guidence. Thats what the models are run for. They obviously do not have the best handle on a system when it hasnt formed yet, but it still takes key things into account and gives you an "idea" at least.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#538 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:17 pm

12z CMC

:uarrow: :uarrow:

For those who always like to see the CMC runs,above is the 12z run.Last night it had a cat 4 moving thru the GOM.What it has today,find out at link. :)
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: INVEST 92L : Models Thread

#539 Postby tolakram » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:27 pm

cycloneye wrote:12z CMC

:uarrow: :uarrow:

For those who always like to see the CMC runs,above is the 12z run.Last night it had a cat 4 moving thru the GOM.What it has today,find out at link. :)


Ouch, that's just cruel.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#540 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:28 pm

I still can't get why everyone is looking at the model runs when nothing has formed.

I, to be honest, do not get that post. it is contradictory to every accepted meteorological practice. One must look at the models prior to formation. A global model forms its own center... it does not need one to be artifically placed in the model
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests