Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Pedro Fernández
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Age: 47
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:24 am
Location: Costa Tropical (Granada, Spain).
Contact:

Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#1 Postby Pedro Fernández » Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:48 pm

He has written a very interesting article in his blog... His thoughts about the global 2007 season around the world, with remarkable conclusions at the end. Here is the link:

http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#2 Postby RL3AO » Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:15 pm

That is crazy that half of the cat 5s and the strongest storm was in the Atlantic.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#3 Postby Squarethecircle » Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:41 pm

I think, though, that Sidr was probably a category five. That would mean that both the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean had more category fives than the West Pacific, which would be preposterous had it not happened.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#4 Postby KWT » Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:01 pm

Its certainly interestingand also shows that when all is said and done the atlantic actually had a pretty normal season...bar of course the two cat-5 which is very rare even in recent times.

Wasn't the globes strongest systemin the atlantic in 2005 as well with Wilma or was there something stronger then that?
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#5 Postby Squarethecircle » Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:41 pm

:uarrow: It was Wilma, by around like 30 hPa or something. No contest. Some of the other basins had an off year, I think. The WPac's strongest storm was only around 920! Interestingly enough, the three big category fives in 2005 were the three most intense of that year.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#6 Postby Ptarmigan » Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:22 pm

Three of the four Category 5 hurricanes made landfall as Category 5. 1977 was very quiet for every basin.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#7 Postby Cyclone1 » Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:25 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:Three of the four Category 5 hurricanes made landfall as Category 5. 1977 was very quiet for every basin.


77 was quiet, but the Atlantic kicked off the year with a Category 5. Granted... in September, but still. Abnormally slow world wide.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#8 Postby Ptarmigan » Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:29 pm

Squarethecircle wrote::uarrow: It was Wilma, by around like 30 hPa or something. No contest. Some of the other basins had an off year, I think. The WPac's strongest storm was only around 920! Interestingly enough, the three big category fives in 2005 were the three most intense of that year.


Wilma was more like a typhoon in many ways. It formed from a monsoonal trough and had 892 millibars and 155 mph winds, which corresponds with the Dvorak Technique for the Northwest Pacific.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#9 Postby Ptarmigan » Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:31 pm

Cyclone1 wrote:
77 was quiet, but the Atlantic kicked off the year with a Category 5. Granted... in September, but still. Abnormally slow world wide.


Yeah, that was Anita, which was initially thought to be a Category 4. I always wondered why 1977 was quiet. I think it is because combination of coming off of a weak El Nino, monsoon activities, cooler Atlantic water, and strong Arctic Oscillation.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#10 Postby Ptarmigan » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:06 pm

Here is a list of global tropical cyclone activity.

http://www.hurricanealley.net/glblhst.htm

Since 1970, the most active was 1974, while 1977 had just 66 storms.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#11 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:13 pm

Comparison between the intensity of storms in the Atlantic and worldwide is difficult to do when you have a basin enjoying the work of Hurricane Hunters and the rest making estimates.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#12 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:16 pm

Hmmmm, still people looking for Atlantic basin TCs there. Now I'll have to visit the NESDIS site to see if this guy is onto something, or smoking crack.


95. cchsweatherman 11:36 PM GMT on February 01, 2008
I know that 456, but I just like to have support for my data. Wind shear at this time continues to decrease throughout the Caribbean and over the system, but there is a narrow region of increasing shear between the system and the Caribbean. As 456 had made mention to eariler, there is now an apparent upper-ridge developing in the Caribbean. I must agree with 456 that there is not a closed circulation as of yet, but the circulation developing continues to become better defined and may become closed if it encounters some lower shear overnight. Convection is not all that impressive with only some isolated areas of moderate-to-heavy convection to the south. I do not expect development, if any, until it enters the Caribbean where it will be under the influence of the aforementioned upper level ridge. I state if any since there is some deep, abundant dry air encompassing nearly the entire Caribbean. It will have to contend with this dry air in order to see any development. The bottomline is that it just bares watching, although it remains highly unlikely anything will develop.

0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#13 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:21 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Hmmmm, still people looking for Atlantic basin TCs there. Now I'll have to visit the NESDIS site to see if this guy is onto something, or smoking crack.


95. cchsweatherman 11:36 PM GMT on February 01, 2008
I know that 456, but I just like to have support for my data. Wind shear at this time continues to decrease throughout the Caribbean and over the system, but there is a narrow region of increasing shear between the system and the Caribbean. As 456 had made mention to eariler, there is now an apparent upper-ridge developing in the Caribbean. I must agree with 456 that there is not a closed circulation as of yet, but the circulation developing continues to become better defined and may become closed if it encounters some lower shear overnight. Convection is not all that impressive with only some isolated areas of moderate-to-heavy convection to the south. I do not expect development, if any, until it enters the Caribbean where it will be under the influence of the aforementioned upper level ridge. I state if any since there is some deep, abundant dry air encompassing nearly the entire Caribbean. It will have to contend with this dry air in order to see any development. The bottomline is that it just bares watching, although it remains highly unlikely anything will develop.




I'm assuming this area of storms around 55º


I'd think the 50 knots of shear would make that an unlikely candidate...

Image
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#14 Postby Coredesat » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:58 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Hmmmm, still people looking for Atlantic basin TCs there. Now I'll have to visit the NESDIS site to see if this guy is onto something, or smoking crack.


95. cchsweatherman 11:36 PM GMT on February 01, 2008
I know that 456, but I just like to have support for my data. Wind shear at this time continues to decrease throughout the Caribbean and over the system, but there is a narrow region of increasing shear between the system and the Caribbean. As 456 had made mention to eariler, there is now an apparent upper-ridge developing in the Caribbean. I must agree with 456 that there is not a closed circulation as of yet, but the circulation developing continues to become better defined and may become closed if it encounters some lower shear overnight. Convection is not all that impressive with only some isolated areas of moderate-to-heavy convection to the south. I do not expect development, if any, until it enters the Caribbean where it will be under the influence of the aforementioned upper level ridge. I state if any since there is some deep, abundant dry air encompassing nearly the entire Caribbean. It will have to contend with this dry air in order to see any development. The bottomline is that it just bares watching, although it remains highly unlikely anything will develop.



I saw that comment and went to look at the satellite. I saw no significant convection, and there isn't any significant convection there now; it's an uninformed user misinterpreting a visible satellite image. Don't believe everything you read.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#15 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:58 am

Coredesat wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Hmmmm, still people looking for Atlantic basin TCs there. Now I'll have to visit the NESDIS site to see if this guy is onto something, or smoking crack.


95. cchsweatherman 11:36 PM GMT on February 01, 2008
I know that 456, but I just like to have support for my data. Wind shear at this time continues to decrease throughout the Caribbean and over the system, but there is a narrow region of increasing shear between the system and the Caribbean. As 456 had made mention to eariler, there is now an apparent upper-ridge developing in the Caribbean. I must agree with 456 that there is not a closed circulation as of yet, but the circulation developing continues to become better defined and may become closed if it encounters some lower shear overnight. Convection is not all that impressive with only some isolated areas of moderate-to-heavy convection to the south. I do not expect development, if any, until it enters the Caribbean where it will be under the influence of the aforementioned upper level ridge. I state if any since there is some deep, abundant dry air encompassing nearly the entire Caribbean. It will have to contend with this dry air in order to see any development. The bottomline is that it just bares watching, although it remains highly unlikely anything will develop.



I saw that comment and went to look at the satellite. I saw no significant convection, and there isn't any significant convection there now; it's an uninformed user misinterpreting a visible satellite image. Don't believe everything you read.



Yeah, it took me about 20 seconds to decide he was a touch over eager.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#16 Postby Squarethecircle » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:35 am

:uarrow: Heh, it took me 40 seconds just to find what he was talking about!

Since when is a random jumble of weak convection interesting? Even in the Summer?
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#17 Postby HurricaneRobert » Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:22 am

Ptarmigan wrote:Here is a list of global tropical cyclone activity.

http://www.hurricanealley.net/glblhst.htm

Since 1970, the most active was 1974, while 1977 had just 66 storms.


Right off the bat their number is wrong for the Atlantic last season. :roll: How hard is it to look that up?
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#18 Postby Squarethecircle » Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:54 am

:uarrow: They're also off by one on 2005.
0 likes   

hcane27
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:33 pm

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#19 Postby hcane27 » Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:19 pm

They have corrected the 2005 and 2006 Atlantic and added the southern hemisphere for 2006 ..... :P
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

Re: Dr. Jeff Masters: global 2007 season, was it unusual?

#20 Postby Squarethecircle » Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:29 pm

hcane27 wrote:They have corrected the 2005 and 2006 Atlantic and added the southern hemisphere for 2006 ..... :P

:eek: So they have...
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests