ATL: Tropical Depression Edouard
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
Re: question- I think I know answer, Canadian and NAM, and Joe Bastardi, with ballpark 1000 mb 40 or 50 knot storm as worst case, somewhere between Intracoastal City and Corpus Christi, but since Monday will be a hectic panic if this develops, and I think I'm pretty good, but no expert, I figured if this is the civilization changing event ie, Bastardi under-predicting a tropical cyclone, I'd better get some pro-met concensus before I just kick back and relax tomorrow....
0 likes
Well until we get a circulation going all estimates are going to have obviously taken with a pinch of salt simply because it could form just about anywhere in that convective mess and that would make a fair difference.
This looks like being the main player for the next 72hrs IMO for the USA to watch, the high should continue to send this mess southwards for now.
This looks like being the main player for the next 72hrs IMO for the USA to watch, the high should continue to send this mess southwards for now.
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
I heard a local met mention that the high should start a move to the east. Does anyone know if this may be the case and, if so, how soon?
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Re: question- I think I know answer, Canadian and NAM, and Joe Bastardi, with ballpark 1000 mb 40 or 50 knot storm as worst case, somewhere between Intracoastal City and Corpus Christi, but since Monday will be a hectic panic if this develops, and I think I'm pretty good, but no expert, I figured if this is the civilization changing event ie, Bastardi under-predicting a tropical cyclone, I'd better get some pro-met concensus before I just kick back and relax tomorrow....
Derek didn't offer a specific answer as what the limit is, but suggested Bastardi may have, possibly, underforecasted, for the first time ever, a tropical cyclone.
Stay tuned...
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
LaBreeze wrote:I heard a local met mention that the high should start a move to the east. Does anyone know if this may be the case and, if so, how soon?
It's expanding east as we speak. As evidenced on satellite imagery, the system and associated surface low will move slowly SW.
500-850 mb streamline analysis from CIMSS:
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm2.html
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
Tropical Depression tomorrow, Tropical Storm by Monday.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
NDG wrote:I am not impressed by this system at all, at least tonight I am not. To think that this is not getting a northerly ML shear would be incorrect, IMO. There is a reason why lowest pressures are found well north of the convection tonight.
There is no reason to be "impressed" it's not even a depression yet.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
Re:
NDG wrote:I am not impressed by this system at all, at least tonight I am not. To think that this is not getting a northerly ML shear would be incorrect, IMO. There is a reason why lowest pressures are found well north of the convection tonight.

Yes because every invest has its lowest pressures in the convection.
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
haven't paid attention to the weather the past few days and we now have 3 investments, wow. Hopefully none of these do anything crazy.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Stormcenter wrote:NDG wrote:I am not impressed by this system at all, at least tonight I am not. To think that this is not getting a northerly ML shear would be incorrect, IMO. There is a reason why lowest pressures are found well north of the convection tonight.
There is no reason to be "impressed" it's not even a depression yet.
It doesn't even have surface convergence and not even a broad surface circulation centered over water anymore. NE mid level winds keep pushing moisture southward away from lowest surface pressures.
0 likes
- canetracker
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 751
- Age: 62
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
- Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
Cristobal also formed from a stalled front hanging over the Gulf. Lots of latent GOM heat there touching it off.
The season is starting to turn the corner towards primetime. Lots of humidity for storm fuel.
Any chance of this kicking out NE between the Highs?
The season is starting to turn the corner towards primetime. Lots of humidity for storm fuel.
Any chance of this kicking out NE between the Highs?
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Re:
NDG wrote:Stormcenter wrote:NDG wrote:I am not impressed by this system at all, at least tonight I am not. To think that this is not getting a northerly ML shear would be incorrect, IMO. There is a reason why lowest pressures are found well north of the convection tonight.
There is no reason to be "impressed" it's not even a depression yet.
It doesn't even have surface convergence and not even a broad surface circulation centered over water anymore. NE mid level winds keep pushing moisture southward away from lowest surface pressures.
I still expect it to develop.
0 likes
Sanibel wrote:Cristobal also formed from a stalled front hanging over the Gulf. Lots of latent GOM heat there touching it off.
The season is starting to turn the corner towards primetime. Lots of humidity for storm fuel.
Any chance of this kicking out NE between the Highs?
Very little chance of kicking NE, building ridge to the north will push this mess eventually Wesward.
Last edited by NDG on Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm
Re: Re:
Stormcenter wrote:NDG wrote:NDG wrote:I am not impressed by this system at all, at least tonight I am not. To think that this is not getting a northerly ML shear would be incorrect, IMO. There is a reason why lowest pressures are found well north of the convection tonight.
There is no reason to be "impressed" it's not even a depression yet.
It doesn't even have surface convergence and not even a broad surface circulation centered over water anymore. NE mid level winds keep pushing moisture southward away from lowest surface pressures.
I still expect it to develop.[/quote]
Ya Dolly did the same thing. It did have more time to do that stuff, but shear is not bad, temps are great, this storms only big problem is how much time it has on water. So it might do that stuff but it will get its act together. Probably tomm.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Stormcenter wrote:NDG wrote:Stormcenter wrote:There is no reason to be "impressed" it's not even a depression yet.
It doesn't even have surface convergence and not even a broad surface circulation centered over water anymore. NE mid level winds keep pushing moisture southward away from lowest surface pressures.
I still expect it to develop.
I am not saying it would not, but I don't see it happening tonight or tomorrow as some are thinking. Maybe on Monday.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico
tolakram wrote:Buoy data ...
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42040
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42039
Note that pressures are rising at both locations now. I assume this is the regular daily up and down, but if something was forming I would expect pressures to be more steady or falling.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests