oyster_reef wrote:Looking at the recent IR it looks like he's losing his cold tops.
Sucking in dry air.
IMO he lost his cold tops early this morning.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
oyster_reef wrote:Looking at the recent IR it looks like he's losing his cold tops.
Sucking in dry air.
Shockwave wrote:4 o'clock is the next update right? If the satelittle does any justoce to what the update will be, what could we expect? 60-65 sustained winds?
bayoubebe wrote:Frank2 wrote:It seems we have posters here who want to see Ed explode, and, others here who are trying to make some sense of the situation as per Ed's slow growth - please give us a chance to share our knowledge with you, since it'll help to stem any rumors...
Ed looks well-organized on satellite, but, as Derek mentioned, nothing yet per recon that is any higher than mentioned in the last NHC advisory...
It's close proximity to land is helping to slow it's development, but, we'll see what happens...
When you say " give us a chance to share "OUR" knowledge here," I"m curious, are you a pro met?
I don't post much, I do read here, most especially when there is a tropical storm out there. I tend to take the pro mets posts the most serious. I like coming here for information about the tropical conditions.
If you don't mind, can you clarify the OUR in your above post, and if you have some sort of profession in the weather field.
Thank you.
Thank you to all the pros out there providing information.
Air Force Met wrote:Shockwave wrote:4 o'clock is the next update right? If the satelittle does any justoce to what the update will be, what could we expect? 60-65 sustained winds?
No...don't expect much of a change....
hurricanetrack wrote:For those who might have enough knowledge of such things, I am curious as to why the GFDL and the HWRF differ so greatly on intensity? How could two models of the modern era be so different? It's not a ghastly difference but the GFDL shows ~990mb and the HWRF shows 1003mb near landfall. Why? I guess if we knew that exactly then we could fix which one is broke...but anyhow, I am curious and I think other people probably are too.
terrapintransit wrote:I agree shockwave. It does appear more threatning now. It's developing more of a tighter wrap. Maybe it's just our newbie eyes playing tricks on us.
Sanibel wrote:GFDL is notoriously aggressive on intensity and is said to measure windspeed higher from the surface than other models.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests