HurricaneHunter914 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Also, landfall east of GLS Bay now passing east of downtown Houston.
And there goes my hopes for rain.......
Time to get out the sprinkler
Moderator: S2k Moderators
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:wxman57 wrote:Also, landfall east of GLS Bay now passing east of downtown Houston.
And there goes my hopes for rain.......
wxman57 wrote:Also, landfall east of GLS Bay now passing east of downtown Houston.
fasterdisaster wrote:OK guys, this is getting weird. The storm is honestly heading straight for just west of Lake Morgan around where TS Matthew 2004 made landfall and this is way more than a wobble.
The storm is not headed for Lake Morgan. In fact, Lake Morgan is not even in the NHC 11pm cone. The storm would actually have to turn around and head NE to reach Lake Morgan, and that is not very likely.fasterdisaster wrote:OK guys, this is getting weird. The storm is honestly heading straight for just west of Lake Morgan around where TS Matthew 2004 made landfall and this is way more than a wobble.
canetracker wrote:Regardless of direction, it looks like the close proximity to land could hinder further intensification.
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Radar/OneKM.aspx?location=USLA0224&enlarge=true&animate=true
This almost looks like a landfalling tropical system or at least one that is skirting the coast.
Never have I seen such alignment in the models to suggest that I'm going to get nailed in my life. I'm just glad the intenisty forecast is not too scary.wxman57 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:chances of a hurricane, while not unrealistic, are only about 5-10% now. I do not see a scenario where this exceeds 70KT
Tell you what, after Humberto last year I'd go a good bit higher on this storm with 18 more hours over water temps near 90 degrees. I had 50% on my last forecast. We've been going 75 mph since yesterday for landfall. See no reason to change. However, any 75 mph winds would be in a tiny area offshore. No such winds over land. It would only be a hurricane in name only, really.
I still can't believe the NHC has been forecasting 70 mph winds prior to landfall and no hurricane warning. They must not want to trigger an evacuation, maybe?
Just plotted the 00Z models. Threw out NAM and NOGAPS, kept the better consensus models, HWRF, and GFDL. Tight consensus for Galveston Bay.
TTheriot1975 wrote:This means that it is shifting east already..and at 60 mph? Is that now? or estimated from when recon passed earlier?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests