ATL: Tropical Depression Fay

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re:

#3401 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:26 am

bob rulz wrote:Do you think it will be upgraded at 11am?


Who knows when they will upgrade this. In truth I believe it is because of the broadness of the LLC, you can see that its cirulation is hundreds of miles in size. Maybe when it forms a swirl like LLC.
0 likes   

Cat5x

Re: Re:

#3402 Postby Cat5x » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:29 am

RL3AO wrote:
bob rulz wrote:Do you think it will be upgraded at 11am?


They will upgrade the moment a station, buoy, ship, or recon give them something that shows a well defined surface circulation.


How about radar ? http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... A&loop=yes
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1543
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#3403 Postby bahamaswx » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:30 am

I think that letting it go unclassified based on a technicality while it continues to pose an immediate threat to the greater antilles is irrepsonsible. This has been more or less the rationale behind the upgrade (and continuation) of quite a few systems in recent years in the GOM, despite recon not being able to discern a LLC.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#3404 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:31 am

Cat5x wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
bob rulz wrote:Do you think it will be upgraded at 11am?


They will upgrade the moment a station, buoy, ship, or recon give them something that shows a well defined surface circulation.


How about radar ? http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... A&loop=yes


Radar is looking at the mid levels, not the low levels.
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5078
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

#3405 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:39 am

AL, 92, 2008081506, , BEST, 0, 183N, 654W, 30, 1011, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1016, 150, 30, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, D,

Now updated to note it as being a deep system.
0 likes   

Cat5x

Re: Re:

#3406 Postby Cat5x » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:39 am

RL3AO wrote:Radar is looking at the mid levels, not the low levels.


Well that swirling rain will eventually make it to the lower levels :lol:
0 likes   

weatherguru18

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3407 Postby weatherguru18 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:44 am

Thanks wthrman13. That's what I was thinking but couldn't put it into words. Pulling out terms that, at the time in school, I thought were ridiculous and nobody would ever need to know that...oops. Guess I should have paid a bit more attention instead of stumbling (and I mean stumbling) into class either half asleep or...well, you know. LOL :eek: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3408 Postby Recurve » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:46 am

Easy now. We have a developing system making landfall. All hopes and prayers for people in its path.

I expect upgrade now at 5 a.m. I'm guessing the radar presentation will make a lower level vortex evident.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1706
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#3409 Postby bob rulz » Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:55 am

I actually meant to ask if this would be upgraded at 5am, but my mistake. Either way, I would be surprised if it wasn't upgraded by 11am, and it may even be upgraded at 5am. However, I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't upgraded at 5am, considering there's no recon or visible.
0 likes   

Cat5x

#3410 Postby Cat5x » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:01 am

On a side note, Anyone else think this will go right to a TS ? and skip TD.

How many times has that happened already this year. Isn't that proof that the NHC waits too long to classify a TD ?

Yeah so there is no LLC but if it has deep convenction persistant for 12 + hours, nice outflow, in 85+ degree water no sheer and a Mid level circulation t hat is building to the ground. I don't understand why that isn't enough to classify a TD? They wait till it is 100% perfect and it is already a TS.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3411 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:01 am

So how 'bout that 92L huh? Pretty weird....
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#3412 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:03 am

Cat5x wrote:On a side note, Anyone else think this will go right to a TS ? and skip TD.

How many times has that happened already this year. Isn't that proof that the NHC waits too long to classify a TD ?

Yeah so there is no LLC but if it has deep convenction persistant for 12 + hours, nice outflow, in 85+ degree water no sheer and a Mid level circulation t hat is building to the ground. I don't understand why that isn't enough to classify a TD? They wait till it is 100% perfect and it is already a TS.



No LLC = no cyclone...period.

As for the waiting to long question.

Dolly had TS force winds for days but it was moving to fast to close an LLC. Once it slowed down and closed the LLC, it was already a storm.

Edouard had a strong MLC but didnt develop an LLC until it was already at storm stregth. NHC was late on Arthur, but they didn't have any data to show a TS until it had made landfall.
0 likes   

weatherguru18

Re:

#3413 Postby weatherguru18 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:04 am

Cat5x wrote:On a side note, Anyone else think this will go right to a TS ? and skip TD.

How many times has that happened already this year. Isn't that proof that the NHC waits too long to classify a TD ?

Yeah so there is no LLC but if it has deep convenction persistant for 12 + hours, nice outflow, in 85+ degree water no sheer and a Mid level circulation t hat is building to the ground. I don't understand why that isn't enough to classify a TD? They wait till it is 100% perfect and it is already a TS.


Well they called Bertha pretty darn quick...practically right off the coast of Africa...as soon as it hit water. Though I tend to agree with you. It seems like they are waiting an aweful long time on some storms...but then again, no closed low, no storm. They kept Dolly a T.S. and it had no LLC. Technically, it should have been downgraded, however, the NHC said it was really a technicality because the LLC was bound to reform and soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3414 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:05 am

Image
0 likes   

weatherguru18

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3415 Postby weatherguru18 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:06 am

Ugh...I thought about staying up to see if they upgrade it, but I can't make it. I'm a wimp. Oh well, I'd imagine I'll be welcoming Fay into the world by the time I get up in the morning. Night guys/gals....
0 likes   

Cat5x

Re:

#3416 Postby Cat5x » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:06 am

RL3AO wrote:No closed LLC = no tropical cyclone. Its pretty simple.



To me thats too literally speaking. Im more pratical thinking, i've seen LLC that had no thunderstorms with them and they could barely blow out a candle but they were classified a TD. Then on the other hand you have an INVEST here that you know has 45+ mph gust, a "broad circulation" a spin on the radar that i was told was a mid level circulation, this looks like a monster that is growing, can drop 20 inches of rain, and in all honeslty could be 10x stronger then some weak beep beep LLC systems i have seen in the past, but this remains just an "invest".

So the rule of law, end all, no LLC no tropical cyclone just doesn't seem pratical to me.
Last edited by Cat5x on Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re:

#3417 Postby wxmann_91 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:07 am

Cat5x wrote:On a side note, Anyone else think this will go right to a TS ? and skip TD.

How many times has that happened already this year. Isn't that proof that the NHC waits too long to classify a TD ?

Yeah so there is no LLC but if it has deep convenction persistant for 12 + hours, nice outflow, in 85+ degree water no sheer and a Mid level circulation t hat is building to the ground. I don't understand why that isn't enough to classify a TD? They wait till it is 100% perfect and it is already a TS.

I think it will, and no, it isn't proof that NHC waits too long. Many times waves are embedded in strong low level easterly flow. In these conditions it is extremely difficult to close off a center. But b/c the ambient low level environment is already characterized by strong winds, the wave helps to enhance these, and so these tropical waves can often have TS-force winds. Once the LLC finally is able to close off, the system already has TS-force winds, and so it jumps the TD stage.

There is no LLC. By definition that is not a TC. This is all convection but no organization. No banding visible on radar, let alone satellite.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

Re:

#3418 Postby Wthrman13 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:10 am

Cat5x wrote:On a side note, Anyone else think this will go right to a TS ? and skip TD.

How many times has that happened already this year. Isn't that proof that the NHC waits too long to classify a TD ?

Yeah so there is no LLC but if it has deep convenction persistant for 12 + hours, nice outflow, in 85+ degree water no sheer and a Mid level circulation t hat is building to the ground. I don't understand why that isn't enough to classify a TD? They wait till it is 100% perfect and it is already a TS.


It's simple really, and you said it yourself. The definition of a tropical cyclone indicates that it must have a closed *surface* circulation. Without that it is not a TC. Yes, it is a somewhat arbitrary definition, and as far as sensible weather is concerned there is indeed little difference between an open wave with 45 kts sustained winds and a TS with 45 kt sustained winds, but that is how these things are classified at the current time. The NHC is under no obligation to change this. If at some point, it becomes agreed upon that a system doesn't have to have a closed surface circulation to be a TC, then well and good, but that is not the case right now, and not likely to be in the foreseeable future. Any classification system is going to have drawbacks, but we do what we can. We humans tend to get so passionate about them (just look at the uproar over the demotion of Pluto)!

About 92L, even without the above considerations, I think the NHC made a good call not upgrading. The convective organization is still very poor, and the surface winds are mostly light over a broad area. That will likely change, but it hasn't happened yet.
Last edited by Wthrman13 on Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Meso
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1609
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

#3419 Postby Meso » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:11 am

Look dude... That's the way meteorology works. If there is no closed low then by definition it's not a tropical depression.There is no way around it or 'it looks good enough to be', 'the winds are strong enough'...By the laws of science it just isn't a tropical depression, I can go around wanting to call a dog a cat cause it has fur, but that doesn't mean it is one.

Cold fronts bring stronger winds at times, should we throw out the fact that they are 'cold fronts' and issue tropical storm warnings for it.. There are warnings in place by various meteorological organizations to put forward warnings of conditions. But until this becomes a depression, it's a local weather services duties, not the NHC
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Cheese
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 12:40 am
Location: Green Bay, WI (UWGB Earth Science Alum)

#3420 Postby Hurricane Cheese » Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:13 am

Something being lost here amongst all the talk of whether it's a TS or not, is the fact that it appears to be barreling right into the Greater Antilles. Perhaps it is the satellite pics playing tricks with me at this later hour but I see no way this makes it into the southern Bahamas. The mountains of Hispaniola await, which could make this system's quest to become a Tropical Storm a short one.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests