HouTXmetro wrote:Stormcenter wrote:Have any of the models forecasted Gustav track correctly since it formed?
No
I didn't think so.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
HouTXmetro wrote:Stormcenter wrote:Have any of the models forecasted Gustav track correctly since it formed?
No
HouTXmetro wrote:Javlin wrote:Stormcenter wrote:Have any of the models forecasted Gustav track correctly since it formed?
Stormcenter I had a site yesterday I linked to and save related to oil/gas production loss due to Gustav and they showed the NHC model of course and they showed another without naming they had been tracking as the most successful with Gustav to that point.The model appeared to be either the HWRF or the GFDL for the location they projected was the MGC about 50 miles E of the NHC.I have tried to hit the site today but it is tring to redirect me to nothing now except a new search engine.
That would have been the GFDL near MS.
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/18/index_ten_l_loop.shtml
18z about to roll..Not sure I like the initilization of gus below Jamica
weatherguru18 wrote:UKMET...Not good for Houston!!
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
weatherguru18 wrote:UKMET...Not good for Houston!!
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
srainhoutx wrote:Ridge looks fairly strong over the Great Lakes. The trough is staying out W as well. Keep an eye as these runs ingest NOAA flight data concerning tomorrow's runs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests