ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#841 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:52 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:Storm is clearly moving way faster then the NHC forecasts....and the globals seem to be missing this...except perhaps the GFDL model.

GFDL seems to be showing the storm's current movement very well.


I don't think its moving that much faster. Go back to the advisory from yesterday and compare it to where it was supposed to be by 5pm today. Its roughly the same longitude (though they missed the latitude a little).

Look at the 09z forecast from this morning. Its actually 20 miles SLOWER. Its 20 miles ENE of where it was supposed to be.

So...its moving at about the forecasted speed.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: Re:

#842 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:00 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Storm is clearly moving way faster then the NHC forecasts....and the globals seem to be missing this...except perhaps the GFDL model.

GFDL seems to be showing the storm's current movement very well.


I don't think its moving that much faster. Go back to the advisory from yesterday and compare it to where it was supposed to be by 5pm today. Its roughly the same longitude (though they missed the latitude a little).

Look at the 09z forecast from this morning. Its actually 20 miles SLOWER. Its 20 miles ENE of where it was supposed to be.

So...its moving at about the forecasted speed.


Position from twelve hours ago...

20.6N, 49.6W
12 Hr Forecast: 21.3N, 52.2W


Now... 21.6N, 52.7W


So that's about .5W every 12 hours?


Extrapolate that for the next 4 days..... that's 4 degrees farther west right? Could definitely be very significant when we're talking about a system possibly missing a weakness and getting into the GOM.


This is of course, just my opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#843 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:03 pm

Certainly is a small eye, not quite pinhole but still a small eye and a pretty compact little system, would expect it would increase in strength pretty rapidly, the IR imagery with the green is real impressive!

The only thing is the system is a touch flat on the northern side, maybe a sign of the shear the NHC were mentioning?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#844 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:05 pm

Image

A clear microwave image showing the a solid eyewall.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#845 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:11 pm

Very impressive presentation Hurakan, looks almost like a cat-2 and I suspect it will be sooner rather then later, the southern eyewall still looks a touch on the thin side but the gap is steadily being filled in now and the rest of the system looks intense.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#846 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:13 pm

Current Intensity Analysis




UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 7.2.3
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 03 SEP 2008 Time : 221500 UTC
Lat : 21:36:24 N Lon : 52:52:18 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
4.3 / 983.0mb/ 72.2kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
(3hr avg)
4.3 5.8 6.4

Latitude bias adjustment to MSLP : +0.8mb

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR :N/A km

Center Temp : -40.1C Cloud Region Temp : -72.7C

Scene Type : EYE

Positioning Method : SPIRAL ANALYSIS

Ocean Basin : ATLANTIC
Dvorak CI > MSLP Conversion Used : ATLANTIC

Tno/CI Rules : Constraint Limits : 2.2T/6hr
Weakening Flag : OFF
Rapid Dissipation Flag : OFF

Numbers soaring in a hurry.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#847 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:15 pm

Why is Ike's eye contracting so rapidly? Im a little confused...
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#848 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:18 pm

Image
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#849 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:18 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Position from twelve hours ago...

20.6N, 49.6W
12 Hr Forecast: 21.3N, 52.2W


Now... 21.6N, 52.7W


So that's about .5W every 12 hours?


Extrapolate that for the next 4 days..... that's 4 degrees farther west right? Could definitely be very significant when we're talking about a system possibly missing a weakness and getting into the GOM.


This is of course, just my opinion.


The 12 hr positions aren't for 5PM. They are for the synoptic times: 06z/12z/18z/00z. You can't just compare those points. I am comparing the true points using hurrtrak. That 12hr forecast was for 18z...that's 2PM...not 5PM (which is the advisory time). That's 3 hrs of lost movement. Considering its moving at 16 kts...over 3 hours (21z-18z=3hrs)...that 48 NM. That's your error of .5 (actually more).

I am using hurrtrak to compare the extrapolated movement over each hour and I am telling you there is no error...and the 09z advisory is actually too fast.
0 likes   

User avatar
Just Joshing You
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nova Scotia

#850 Postby Just Joshing You » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:19 pm

The eye wall is like.. the entire storm LOL
0 likes   

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: Re:

#851 Postby lonelymike » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:20 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Position from twelve hours ago...

20.6N, 49.6W
12 Hr Forecast: 21.3N, 52.2W


Now... 21.6N, 52.7W


So that's about .5W every 12 hours?


Extrapolate that for the next 4 days..... that's 4 degrees farther west right? Could definitely be very significant when we're talking about a system possibly missing a weakness and getting into the GOM.


This is of course, just my opinion.


The 12 hr positions aren't for 5PM. They are for the synoptic times: 06z/12z/18z/00z. You can't just compare those points. I am comparing the true points using hurrtrak. That 12hr forecast was for 18z...that's 2PM...not 5PM (which is the advisory time). That's 3 hrs of lost movement. Considering its moving at 16 kts...over 3 hours (21z-18z=3hrs)...that 48 NM. That's your error of .5 (actually more).

I am using hurrtrak to compare the extrapolated movement over each hour and I am telling you there is no error...and the 09z advisory is actually too fast.


Never argue with a professional sir. :ggreen: :spam:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#852 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:21 pm

Small system and those Dvorak numbers are going up very quickly indeed, nearly 4.5 which would justify 75kts and thats a big leap up from where it was even recently.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#853 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:21 pm

1) With Gus' track under Jamaica the NHC track originally went south of Jamaica, but then shifted north, but eventually actually verified south of Jamaica.

2) At this latitude recurve is very strong climatologically.

3) Watch GFDL.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#854 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:24 pm

9z advisory

FORECAST VALID 03/1800Z 21.3N 52.2W

Actual location 03/1800z (from ATCF) 21.2N, 51.9W

Like AF Met said, just a tad slower of the 9z forecast.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#855 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:25 pm

Watch this loop! You can clearly see the eye contract and now I would say it has a pinhole eye now!

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-jsl.html
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#856 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:26 pm

Image

Image

"What a beauty" RIP Steve Irwin.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#857 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:26 pm

Sanibel wrote:1) With Gus' track under Jamaica the NHC track originally went south of Jamaica, but then shifted north, but eventually actually verified south of Jamaica.

2) At this latitude recurve is very strong climatologically.

3) Watch GFDL.


NHC never went with a track south of Jamaica (edit: initially). The original track was north of Cuba. They didn't have it going south of Jamaica until adv 13.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#858 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:28 pm

Looking pretty impressive there Hurakan, we may well be seeing some very quick strengthening going on right now, quite possibly , eyewall totally closed with the eye a little covered but not by a big amount...cat-2 anyone?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145351
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#859 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:30 pm

We will know in about an hour from now if NHC increasees the winds at 11 PM Advisory,when Best Track updates.
0 likes   

nolecaster
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Tallahassee
Contact:

Re: ATL Hurricane IKE - Discussion

#860 Postby nolecaster » Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:31 pm

This definitely looks like a cat-2 to me. Impressive stuff. Beautiful storm.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests