ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6021 Postby ROCK » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:15 pm

Carla was a huge storm with a very above average windfield.....pushed in a lot of surge also and the only F4 tornado to hit the Galveston Strand area.....
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6022 Postby Sanibel » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:21 pm

0 likes   

Shoshana
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1414
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:50 pm
Location: NE Austin

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6023 Postby Shoshana » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:23 pm

MGC wrote:EDIT: Please refresh my memory, how big and bad was Carla at landfall?

.


From Wikipedia

Hurricane Carla was one of two Category 5 tropical cyclones during the 1961 Atlantic hurricane season. It struck the Texas coast as a Category 4 hurricane, becoming one of the most powerful storms to ever strike the United States and the strongest ever to hit Texas.
...

Storm surge was measured at 22 feet (6.7 m) near the heads of bays, in some places penetrating 10 miles inland. Because of its large size, the entire Texas coast was affected, and damage was reported as far inland as Dallas. Sustained winds were reported to be 115 mph in Matagorda, 110 mph in Victoria and 88 mph in Galveston. Wind gusts as high as 170 mph were recorded at Port Lavaca.


edited to add - I read in a couple of places that Hurricane Carla had a diameter of hurricane-force winds of 300 miles, and diameter of tropical storm (gale) force winds of 500 miles. But I can't find any 'official' source for that.
Last edited by Shoshana on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6024 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:23 pm

jinftl wrote:INTERESTS IN SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE YUCATAN PENINSULA SHOULD MONITOR
THE PROGRESS OF IKE.


Had anyone noticed the YUCATAN has been added to this statement.....hmmm....early clue that track shift south coming tomorrow?


that's how I'm reading it.....I'd imagine residents in Mexico are starting to pay attention to Ike....tonight as models keep shifting farther and farther south and west.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6025 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:27 pm

It is possible they only added the Yucatan because it is the next closest area of land to be near Ike....but that being said, the Yucatan is not in the cone, no mention of Yucatan has been made in any advisory discussion, and for the Yucatan to even get peripheral ts conditions, the track would have to almost keep going west to slight north of west....thus, a track change

gatorcane wrote:
jinftl wrote:INTERESTS IN SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE YUCATAN PENINSULA SHOULD MONITOR
THE PROGRESS OF IKE.


Had anyone noticed the YUCATAN has been added to this statement.....hmmm....early clue that track shift south coming tomorrow?


that's how I'm reading it.....I'd imagine residents in Mexico are starting to pay attention to Ike....tonight as models keep shifting farther and farther south and west.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6026 Postby Sanibel » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:30 pm

IMO the Gulf ridge won't plunge as much as the Atlantic ridge. Therefore the south and west trend should bottom out soon. There's a limit to climatology.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6027 Postby southerngale » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:33 pm

wx247 wrote:
MGC wrote:After reading the 11pm discussion, and observing Ike's cloud structure this evening, I am getting concerned that Ike will likely strengthen beyond what the NHC is forecasting as Ike trasverses the GOM. Ike, according to the NHC, is redeveloping his core, this feature is parmount for a hurricane to become a major one. Ike should continue to slowly intenisify as he parallels the Cuban coast, provided the hurricane remains off shore. Looks like the poor people that just went though Gustav will get hit by Ike. Thankfully, Ike will not be as intense as Gustav was. With the upper enviroment forecast to be primed for Ike to intensify, we could possibly be witnessing a hurricane far stronger than the 100KTS the NHC is calling far at landfall......MGC

EDIT: Please refresh my memory, how big and bad was Carla at landfall?

Of course the above opinion is MGC's and not an official forecast.


Hey MGC...I am confused. If you are forecasting for it to be "far stronger" than 100 KTS, then wouldn't it be worse than Gustav. Could you clarify? Maybe I have been staring at the screen too long. :double:


I think she meant not as intense as Gustav when it hits Cuba, but stronger than the NHC is currently forecasting for the U.S. landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#6028 Postby ConvergenceZone » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:33 pm

Vortex wrote:I'm starting to think Ike may never make a US landfall and I wouldn't be surprised to see the areas south of brownsville into northern mexico as a final destination.



Yep, this looks Mexico bound to me too. The models keep moving further and further south with no signs of slowing down their trend southward... I don't see it landing in south mexico though. I"m thinking more in North Mexico...I think that's why the posting has slowed down here as well tonight.... I know from the past, anytime a storm starts to look like it will go into Mexico, the posts drop off dramatically..........
0 likes   

User avatar
latemodel25
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:15 am
Location: parrish fl
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6029 Postby latemodel25 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:37 pm

Sanibel wrote:IMO the Gulf ridge won't plunge as much as the Atlantic ridge. Therefore the south and west trend should bottom out soon. There's a limit to climatology.
noticing your location, dont you get a little worried with such uncertainty with this storm? it looks so close to you on radar.. just curious. my uncle lived on pine island and got wiped out by charlie when it came through (sucked all of the water right out of his canal) etc. etc. anyhow i would be very nervous with so much uncertainty. although all the models appear to be in consensus.. (follow the leader?)
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: Re:

#6030 Postby mattpetre » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:41 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
Vortex wrote:I'm starting to think Ike may never make a US landfall and I wouldn't be surprised to see the areas south of brownsville into northern mexico as a final destination.



Yep, this looks Mexico bound to me too. The models keep moving further and further south with no signs of slowing down their trend southward... I don't see it landing in south mexico though. I"m thinking more in North Mexico...I think that's why the posting has slowed down here as well tonight.... I know from the past, anytime a storm starts to look like it will go into Mexico, the posts drop off dramatically..........


I'm willing to bet IKE will be N. of Brownsville at the very least. I just don't see the high riding him all the way till Saturday now. Feel like making any friendly wagers on this one? I'll take north of and right on Corpus and you get all points south.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145483
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6031 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:42 pm

Image
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6032 Postby mattpetre » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:42 pm

Sanibel wrote:IMO the Gulf ridge won't plunge as much as the Atlantic ridge. Therefore the south and west trend should bottom out soon. There's a limit to climatology.


This ridge is strong, but it is definately coming to its rock bottom, I agree completely.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#6033 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:43 pm

Call me crazy but it looks like Ike is moving south of West again.
Last edited by HouTXmetro on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6034 Postby Sanibel » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:44 pm

Same time of year, same track but further south. Beulah 1967:


Image
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6035 Postby mattpetre » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:46 pm

Sanibel wrote:Same time of year, same track but further south. Beulah 1967:


Image


Don't take that track and move it to where IKE currently is... could be ugly for some large city.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6036 Postby fasterdisaster » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:46 pm

I have a wager. If this goes into Mexico I will not post for 2 weeks. I know I shall get snarky 'you promise?' type remarks, but I JUST COVERED THE BASES SO NO SNARKINESS FO YOU. :lol: I just don't think there is any chance this will go to Mexico. The models will start shifting north soon, then settle at a medium, because they have made the trough as possibly futile as they could and the ridge as strong as possible. So there you have it, if it makes landfall SOUTH of the TexMex border I will stop posting for 2 weeks.
0 likes   

Red_Fish
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6037 Postby Red_Fish » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:47 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Call me crazy but it looks like Ike is moving south of West again.


Maybe it's convection wrapping up that makes it look like it is dipping in that direction?
0 likes   

User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6179
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6038 Postby Texas Snowman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:48 pm

Bastardi is thinking a Carla type hit on the middle Tx coast.

I think a Carla like storm is coming, but I'm sticking with my own personal - and totally unofficial - forecast of a hit SW of Galveston.

That area has had some serious September hits in the past, but it has been a long, long time. Think the sand in the hourglass is running out there with Ike.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#6039 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:49 pm

Ike is a big boy from this point of view, would cover the entire state of Florida. Fill in those empty spots in between the convection and he would look like a monster.

Image
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#6040 Postby fasterdisaster » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:51 pm

No doubt about it now, he's trying to strengthen (I know I said it before but he ran into land (kinda) and stopped)
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests