ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Aristotle
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Age: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Crowley, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6381 Postby Aristotle » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:28 am

haml8 wrote:
Sabanic wrote:This is what amazes me about Hurricane forecasting. The forecast has been calling for little sheer, and now that is changing. So much can change, and we probably haven't seen the whole story with Ike yet.


We are on Chapter 25 of a 50 page book :) Some on here buy this Cliff notes and pass the test... Some read the whole book.. Up to you who or what you trust :)



man that book has alot of chapters for a 50 page book :P
0 likes   

gubyw1
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:55 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6382 Postby gubyw1 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:29 am

Given that the overall structure of Ike remains intact and with good convection, I expect Ike to rapidly redevelop as it moves over open water. This ones got Cat 4 written all over it. Buoy SANF1 is now reporting 54 g 59 kts. The NE area is definitely windiest with winds farthest out in that direction. That means if Ike becomes a large upper end cat3/cat 4 (and I'm sure it will) and comes in near Corpus Christi it will rake LA with strong tropical storm force winds. I don't think Ike will decay anywhere near as much as Gustav did. This is based on the excellent structure that Ike has maintained with good feeder bands reaching way out despite having been over Cuba for many hours.
Last edited by gubyw1 on Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#6383 Postby jasons2k » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:29 am

I think dry air will be a bigger factor than shear, and that's iffy.
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6384 Postby haml8 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:30 am

Aristotle wrote:
haml8 wrote:
Sabanic wrote:This is what amazes me about Hurricane forecasting. The forecast has been calling for little sheer, and now that is changing. So much can change, and we probably haven't seen the whole story with Ike yet.


We are on Chapter 25 of a 50 page book :) Some on here buy this Cliff notes and pass the test... Some read the whole book.. Up to you who or what you trust :)



man that book has alot of chapters for a 50 page book :P


You got me!!! :) :) typo... but you get the point ..
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6385 Postby Nederlander » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:30 am

gubyw1 wrote:Given that the overall structure of Ike remains intact and with good convection, I expect Ike to rapidly redevelop as it moves over open water. This ones got Cat 4 written all over it.


unfortunately I agree.... but look what happened to Gustav... never got its act together in the GoM
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#6386 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:30 am

jasons wrote:Yes, the GFS shifted north (Su-PRIZE su-PRIZE) and looky how fast it erodes the ridge. Ike better make that 84hr landfall mark (yeah right) or it's going to go even more north than what it currently shows (8-ball says "likely").




I am not surprised at all.. :D ..climo was against MX/STX and the all knowing / all mighty EURO suggested this same erosion... :lol: :lol: If I had to guess RIGHT NOW it might level out around Matagorda or Freeport....
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6387 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:34 am

It all depends on whether the shear stays low or not around Ike, the shear really isn't all that bad over Ike right now though there does seems to be a little at the upper levels but right now the system probably isn't tall enough in terms of vertical extent to really feel it.

jasons, I think thats the flow round the big high near Mexico, depends whether the core is strong the mix it all out, if its a major then it should be ok.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#6388 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:35 am

Ok, Radar can be decieving but Key West radar appears to show Ike going south of W??

Confirm/deny??
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6389 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:38 am

Still looks about the same as before on the vis imagery dwg71, though the eye is starting to cave in a little now and also slow down, probably as its about to go over the mountions that are present.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#6390 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:41 am

DWG...I think its still moving a solid WNW....MAybe 285-290....
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6391 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:42 am

Agreed Delta though it has slwoed down a touch as it goes over the hillier part of the Cuban track. A little hard to tell with the eye starting to cave in but the inner core looks solid still.

Here is some damage reports from the keys, actually a fair amount from the sounds of things:

http://keysnews.com/node/5440
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#6392 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:44 am

I cant see 285-290. I would venture to say its not moving south of due west, but 270-275 at most. JMO.

Not a wobble war. Hard to tell without an eye.
0 likes   

User avatar
cape_escape
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 745
Age: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:39 am
Location: Cape Coral Florida
Contact:

Re:

#6393 Postby cape_escape » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:47 am

KWT wrote:Agreed Delta though it has slwoed down a touch as it goes over the hillier part of the Cuban track. A little hard to tell with the eye starting to cave in but the inner core looks solid still.

Here is some damage reports from the keys, actually a fair amount from the sounds of things:

http://keysnews.com/node/5440


Wow! How long will they be getting this type of weather?
0 likes   

User avatar
cape_escape
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 745
Age: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:39 am
Location: Cape Coral Florida
Contact:

#6394 Postby cape_escape » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:51 am

Just in case anyone's interested, this is a great loop of the past 48 hours.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... lay48.html
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#6395 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:52 am

Don't know if this has been posted yet...but, if it bombs and does so fairly quickly look what awaits him....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dlm6.GIF
0 likes   

gubyw1
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:55 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6396 Postby gubyw1 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:53 am

Looks like it's still moving 270-275, might have turned a bit but in any case soon Ike will be over the GOM, and it's already has strong appearance on IR and great convection despite being over land.
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re:

#6397 Postby haml8 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:56 am

deltadog03 wrote:Don't know if this has been posted yet...but, if it bombs and does so fairly quickly look what awaits him....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dlm6.GIF


So are you implying that if he goes ballistic and increases in intensity VERY quickly to a Cat 3 storm that the steering winds would take him into florida panhandle?

I am not questioning you just trying to understand what you really mean or are forecasting IF he bombs out..
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#6398 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:00 pm

Well, that weakness is not suppose to stay there longer than 48 hours.....But, in the short term yes, towards that weakness....
0 likes   

CoCo2
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:37 pm
Location: Plaquemines Parish, LA

Re:

#6399 Postby CoCo2 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:04 pm

deltadog03 wrote:Don't know if this has been posted yet...but, if it bombs and does so fairly quickly look what awaits him....

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8dlm6.GIF



Would the next run of models take the weakness you reference into consideration?
Thanks!
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#6400 Postby bob rulz » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:06 pm

It really looks to me that even though the eye is starting to collapse that the banding is actually improving over the ocean. Not a good sign. Inner core and structure are still well intact.

It also took a rather significant wobble to the west just as it made landfall.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests