ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
txag2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3561 Postby txag2005 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:02 pm

How does that compare to the last run?
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3562 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:03 pm

Nearly the same.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3563 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:03 pm

GFS seems to be all over the place with Ike, I suspect when it gets some of the new data in it'll settle down on its ideas somewhat.
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#3564 Postby shah8 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:03 pm

Not materially different. A tiny bit further south.
0 likes   

txag2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3565 Postby txag2005 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:04 pm

I'm interested to see the next batch of runs at 8.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3566 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:05 pm

vaffie wrote:GFS has hardly any new data in it. You have to wait for the 0Z run at 11 pm to see if there's been a true track shift.


Well its a model run, like most others - take it for what its worth. There is some value in it. How much, who knows.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3567 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:06 pm

I don't usually say this but: 18z BUNK....

EDIT: 500mb had SE winds

Isn't Ike moving NW now?
Last edited by Wx_Warrior on Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#3568 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:07 pm

Wasn't the last GFS Matagorda?
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3569 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:07 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:I don't usually say this but: 18z BUNK....

Isn't Ike moving NW now?


Does the 18z have it moving in another direction?
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#3570 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:08 pm

This run is more close the previous four that had south texas landfall.. Not a great recurve yet through 90 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3571 Postby gboudx » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:09 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:I don't usually say this but: 18z BUNK....

Isn't Ike moving NW now?


Does the 18z have it moving in another direction?


Same. Just north of Brownsville.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3572 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:14 pm

gboudx wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:I don't usually say this but: 18z BUNK....

Isn't Ike moving NW now?


Does the 18z have it moving in another direction?


Same. Just north of Brownsville.


12Z had it much further north, 75+ miles I belive. Its a pretty substantial move.

Bottom line, it appears models are zeroing in on an area from North of Brownsville and Matagorda Bay. Lets see what happens.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3573 Postby Nederlander » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:20 pm

NHC still looks like its on the southern edge of the consensus... look for the 11 pm track to shift even further north
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#3574 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:36 pm

Actually that is a Big shift back south. The last run was wll north, almost near Matagorda.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#3575 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:37 pm

I believe I read somewhere that the CONUS Obs/soundings being made tonight of the trough moving into the NW will possibly make adjustments happen with the runs of the models sometime tomorrow. Not sure exactly when, has anyone else read this somewhere?
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re:

#3576 Postby gboudx » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:40 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:I believe I read somewhere that the CONUS Obs/soundings being made tonight of the trough moving into the NW will possibly make adjustments happen with the runs of the models sometime tomorrow. Not sure exactly when, has anyone else read this somewhere?


Jeff Lidner had mentioned something about those soundings in his updates today. Check the TA forum. Maybe that's where you heard this?
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3577 Postby TTheriot1975 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:41 pm

OK..when I see the 78 hr map..doesnt it look like the high is moved more east..that there is no more high as far east as central LA? To me it does...so why would that bring Ike into south Texas...wouldnt that pull him even more north?
0 likes   

User avatar
3ABirdMan
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 37
Age: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Bridge City TX

Re: Re:

#3578 Postby 3ABirdMan » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:43 pm

gboudx wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:I believe I read somewhere that the CONUS Obs/soundings being made tonight of the trough moving into the NW will possibly make adjustments happen with the runs of the models sometime tomorrow. Not sure exactly when, has anyone else read this somewhere?


Jeff Lidner had mentioned something about those soundings in his updates today. Check the TA forum. Maybe that's where you heard this?


It's definetly on HERE somewhere. In fact, I think I read it in TWO different places, but then, when I'm gone for a while, I READ to catch up, I don't just jump to the last post ........ (no sarcasm intended btw)
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#3579 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:03 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Actually that is a Big shift back south. The last run was wll north, almost near Matagorda.


No its not that big of a shift. You might want to look at something that is a little higher resolution. You also need to NOT look at the vort max...since the vort max isn't the center (no vorticity near the center).

12Z run brings it in near Rockport at 00z.

The 18z run brings it in near CRP at 06z. So...its slower and about 50 miles to the south.

It also initializes wrong. At 6 hrs...it has the center on the western tip of Cuba...near 22.5/84.5 moving west. Now...Ike might make a 60 mile jog to the SW over the next hour...but somehow I doubt it.

And above all that...its the GFS for cryin out loud. Take it with a grain of salt fo now. Its track record with Ike...even over the last 48 hrs...is HORRIBLE.
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3580 Postby TTheriot1975 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:07 pm

Ok AFM...I asked a question earlier..maybe you can answer also...OK..when I see the 78 hr map..doesnt it look like the high is moved more east..that there is no more high as far east as central LA? To me it does...so why would that bring Ike into south Texas...wouldnt that pull him even more north?

Also what are your thoughts to eventual landfall?
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests