ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3821 Postby haml8 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:20 pm

Can anyone tell me if this GFDL run is a good one? Whether is was initialized properly, has all the aircraft data loaded, is taking into consideration the front (trough ) from the NW and the sampling of it to determin timing?? Just curious. I know yesterday everyone seemed to dimiss these midday runs as not having the datat to be somewhat reliable...
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3822 Postby Sabanic » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:21 pm

haml8 wrote:Can anyone tell me if this GFDL run is a good one? Whether is was initialized properly, has all the aircraft data loaded, is taking into consideration the front (trough ) from the NW and the sampling of it to determin timing?? Just curious. I know yesterday everyone seemed to dimiss these midday runs as not having the datat to be somewhat reliable...


I remember that also, but I'm sure there is a reason now why it is more verifiable
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3823 Postby vaffie » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:25 pm

Sabanic wrote:
haml8 wrote:Can anyone tell me if this GFDL run is a good one? Whether is was initialized properly, has all the aircraft data loaded, is taking into consideration the front (trough ) from the NW and the sampling of it to determin timing?? Just curious. I know yesterday everyone seemed to dimiss these midday runs as not having the datat to be somewhat reliable...


I remember that also, but I'm sure there is a reason now why it is more verifiable


It's the 6Z and the 18Z runs which don't have much new data in them. The 12 (these ones) and 0Z are good to go...
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3824 Postby rtd2 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:30 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
Sanibel wrote:We are still in GFDL's accuracy range for Ike at this distance. GFDL's history with Ike was nailing trends in advance. This is the second model "wavelength" I was talking about now showing up. GFDL leads with its tail so it is definitely taking the trough into consideration. This is now a tough nut because GFDL has already overblown a trough recurve west of Florida with Ike. The second wavelength is now a poleward rightward influence instead of an under-ridge influence that GFDL excelled at. I have a feeling they'll err on the safe side and you'll be hearing of an evacuation of Houston shortly.



Excellent post Sanibel!
What concerns me is the Friday evening landfall. That's a little over 2 days away!





better kick it into high gear to make friday
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3825 Postby haml8 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:35 pm

vaffie wrote:
Sabanic wrote:
haml8 wrote:Can anyone tell me if this GFDL run is a good one? Whether is was initialized properly, has all the aircraft data loaded, is taking into consideration the front (trough ) from the NW and the sampling of it to determin timing?? Just curious. I know yesterday everyone seemed to dimiss these midday runs as not having the datat to be somewhat reliable...


I remember that also, but I'm sure there is a reason now why it is more verifiable


It's the 6Z and the 18Z runs which don't have much new data in them. The 12 (these ones) and 0Z are good to go...


Thanks for the response... not the answer I WANTED to hear but thanks :) :)
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#3826 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:40 pm

Any word on the EURO, someone on another board said no change but didn't provide a link.
0 likes   

Jagno
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:40 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3827 Postby Jagno » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:42 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3828 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:47 pm

Thats the 0z run, the 12z run hasn't come out yet on that offical site.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3829 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:50 pm

12z NOGAPS has landfall on Matagorda Bay.

Image

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ngptc2.c ... =Animation
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3830 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:51 pm

12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?
0 likes   

User avatar
haml8
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3831 Postby haml8 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:04 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?


I don't know man, zooming in on that (not hi res) It sure looks half way between Matagorda and Freeport.. even closer to freeport heading North through that area. Maybe one of these guys will post a super secrect hi res image of the landfall point :)
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3832 Postby dwg71 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:04 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?


Matagorda Bay Area.. Give or take

Consensous is still Matagorda... lets wait and see, if a trend continues or another shift south.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3833 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:05 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?


not sure something doesnt look right with that run...I wouldnt put to much into it.....b/c we all know the EURO rocks!!


NHC has no choice but to shift the track slightly north now...
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3834 Postby vaffie » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:05 pm

zooming in on the Euro, and it makes landfall just north of the Bay, between Matagorda and Freeport.
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3835 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:07 pm

rtd2 wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:
Sanibel wrote:We are still in GFDL's accuracy range for Ike at this distance. GFDL's history with Ike was nailing trends in advance. This is the second model "wavelength" I was talking about now showing up. GFDL leads with its tail so it is definitely taking the trough into consideration. This is now a tough nut because GFDL has already overblown a trough recurve west of Florida with Ike. The second wavelength is now a poleward rightward influence instead of an under-ridge influence that GFDL excelled at. I have a feeling they'll err on the safe side and you'll be hearing of an evacuation of Houston shortly.



Excellent post Sanibel!
What concerns me is the Friday evening landfall. That's a little over 2 days away!





better kick it into high gear to make friday


http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm5.html
When this ridge builds back north of Ike and slides east, which you can see happening via WV, I believe you'll see Ike hit the gas pedal.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3836 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:07 pm

haml8 wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?


I don't know man, zooming in on that (not hi res) It sure looks half way between Matagorda and Freeport.. even closer to freeport heading North through that area. Maybe one of these guys will post a super secrect hi res image of the landfall point :)




try this....


http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... TNA072.gif


looks aweful close to Freeport.....
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3837 Postby Stratosphere747 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:08 pm

Image
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3838 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:08 pm

ROCK wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?


not sure something doesnt look right with that run...I wouldnt put to much into it.....b/c we all know the EURO rocks!!


NHC has no choice but to shift the track slightly north now...


They always have a choice.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#3839 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:10 pm

Ike is starting to remind me of another famous September Hurricane...

Image

The final track and landfall strength of Ike may wind up being pretty darn close to what happened 108 years ago, IMO.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3840 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:11 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:12z EURO is nearly the same as 0z....Looks like Matagorda.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_12z/ecmwfloop.html

EDIT: put it on 00....Why did EURO initialize Ike over Western Cuba?


Euro is not the same. Last run was W Matagorda bay. This run is over central Matagorda county.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests