ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#781 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:02 pm

Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#782 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:04 pm

I don't think its closed yet Wxman57 but there is some turning I think quite evident if you look at the super high resolution images that have been posted up, doesn't look very widespread nor strong yet though...could you do one of those maps if you have time with those obs btw?

ps, I don't think its at the surface just yet either, will probably need more convection first...also if it leaves it till late tomorrow/Friday to start organising, its going to need some help from the Yucatan on Friday/Sat to get going I think.
Last edited by KWT on Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#783 Postby BigA » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:04 pm

wxman57 wrote:Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.


What level do you think the spinning is occuring at right now? Because in the last few visible frames there were some low clouds rotating about. Were they at the 5000-10000 foot level?
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#784 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:06 pm

This is the most convection near the apparent low since it was in the eastern Carib. If it closes off and develops tomorrow the GFS run which never closes off the low is pretty much in the dark.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#785 Postby thetruesms » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:10 pm

wxman57 wrote:Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.
Image This is why I'm not convinced. Sure, it kinda looks like there's something there, but there's absolutely nothing else out there that supports that interpretation yet. The descending pass for the 2030Z ASCAT shows one northerly barb on the very edge in front of the wave before it drops to nothing in its gap. Just one - sorry, I'm not buying that.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re:

#786 Postby jasons2k » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:16 pm

djones65 wrote:Even though the satellite presentation is chaotic and totally disorganized, I also see some low level rotation west southwest of Jamaica. I am really "impressed" though with the buoy observations Irak and I-wall have posted... I remember reading one of the criteria that NHC specialists look for when evaluating potential development of a disturbance is surface pressure falls of 2-3 mb within a 24 hour period. Obviously there will be diurnal variability of rising and falling pressures so simply "falling" or "rising" is not something that important. However, when you compare the surface pressures to 24 hours previous and we are now seeing near 2 mb pressure falls during the past 24 hours over the western Caribbean Sea I think that is significant. I am thinking the surface low may actually be trying to develop late this afternoon even though satellite presentation is unimpressive, I agree with Sanibel that pressure trumps satellite imagery. Lowest pressure so far is 1009 mb which is at least 2 mb lower than I have previously observed. The ATCF Best track has always had this wave at 1010 mb but I have not seen any surface obs that verified that until today, and now it shows slightly lower than 1010. I think the long awaited development "trend" maybe begining. That being said, I still would be surprised to see tropical cyclone formation until Friday when the energy from the wave over the eastern Caribbean currently along 67W can be absorbed into this system, in my humble opinion.


One thing to remember with buoy observations is that buoys are stationary and the system is moving. A 24-hour relative pressure drop at a buoy doesn't mean the system is getting stronger, it just means it's getting closer.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#787 Postby jasons2k » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:34 pm

Last visibles show a bunch out outflow boundaries get spit out, esp. by the circulation SW of Jamaica. There is another circulation even further South of that. Still a ways to go IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145351
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#788 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:39 pm

Although the winds are light,they are from the north.

North wind in Roatan,Honduras
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#789 Postby brunota2003 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:40 pm

I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?

What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#790 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:42 pm

brunota2003 wrote:I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?

What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?


We weren't expecting it to come together until Friday. Today is Wednesday. It's consolidating very slowly. Come back Friday.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145351
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#791 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:42 pm

Is the first time that 93L has the pressure down to 1009 mbs at Best Track.

AL, 93, 2010062400, , BEST, 0, 170N, 795W, 25, 1009 WV

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Re:

#792 Postby bvigal » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:44 pm

Hurricane Andrew wrote:(Really off topic, but do you know the sympotoms of A Concussion? I just knocked the living daylight's out of myself when i was playing dodgeball. OK. I walked into a tree.)

sent you a PM!
0 likes   

User avatar
WeatherLovingDoc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Re:

#793 Postby WeatherLovingDoc » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:47 pm

brunota2003 wrote:I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?

What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?


A ha! A philosophic weather lover watcher! Got to love them. :sun:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#794 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:47 pm

brunota2003 wrote:I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?

What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?


Shear isn't really that low at the moment though, its not huge shear but I suppose in a system that has had trouble with convergence that shear can be the difference between it forming or not IMO at least in the short term.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#795 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:54 pm

I think we should all take wxmans advice and stop torturing ourselves and come back Friday 8-)
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#796 Postby BigA » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:58 pm

It's not like this thing is out of time. Most of the models don't show it getting to the Yucatan for 3 days or so at least, and in any case, June climatology strongly favors the area farther west. I think Friday's a good bet for the best chance of development, though we should have some trends visible tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
txagwxman
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Tomball, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#797 Postby txagwxman » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:59 pm

wxman57 wrote:Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.


Agree...just a low-level swirl at the moment.
0 likes   
“If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.”

User avatar
txagwxman
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Tomball, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#798 Postby txagwxman » Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:01 pm

I tested out my generator just in case.
0 likes   
“If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.”

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#799 Postby lonelymike » Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:05 pm

Ivanhater wrote:I think we should all take wxmans advice and stop torturing ourselves and come back Friday 8-)



Now you know you're gonna be up at 2am for the next Euro run. Who you kiddin? :lol:
0 likes   


GO SEMINOLES

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#800 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:06 pm

lonelymike wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:I think we should all take wxmans advice and stop torturing ourselves and come back Friday 8-)



Now you know you're gonna be up at 2am for the next Euro run. Who you kiddin? :lol:


Lol, you know me too well :D
0 likes   
Michael


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests