ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22979
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.
0 likes
I don't think its closed yet Wxman57 but there is some turning I think quite evident if you look at the super high resolution images that have been posted up, doesn't look very widespread nor strong yet though...could you do one of those maps if you have time with those obs btw?
ps, I don't think its at the surface just yet either, will probably need more convection first...also if it leaves it till late tomorrow/Friday to start organising, its going to need some help from the Yucatan on Friday/Sat to get going I think.
ps, I don't think its at the surface just yet either, will probably need more convection first...also if it leaves it till late tomorrow/Friday to start organising, its going to need some help from the Yucatan on Friday/Sat to get going I think.
Last edited by KWT on Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
wxman57 wrote:Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.
What level do you think the spinning is occuring at right now? Because in the last few visible frames there were some low clouds rotating about. Were they at the 5000-10000 foot level?
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
- thetruesms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 844
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Tallahasee, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
wxman57 wrote:Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.

0 likes
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 8245
- Age: 51
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
Re:
djones65 wrote:Even though the satellite presentation is chaotic and totally disorganized, I also see some low level rotation west southwest of Jamaica. I am really "impressed" though with the buoy observations Irak and I-wall have posted... I remember reading one of the criteria that NHC specialists look for when evaluating potential development of a disturbance is surface pressure falls of 2-3 mb within a 24 hour period. Obviously there will be diurnal variability of rising and falling pressures so simply "falling" or "rising" is not something that important. However, when you compare the surface pressures to 24 hours previous and we are now seeing near 2 mb pressure falls during the past 24 hours over the western Caribbean Sea I think that is significant. I am thinking the surface low may actually be trying to develop late this afternoon even though satellite presentation is unimpressive, I agree with Sanibel that pressure trumps satellite imagery. Lowest pressure so far is 1009 mb which is at least 2 mb lower than I have previously observed. The ATCF Best track has always had this wave at 1010 mb but I have not seen any surface obs that verified that until today, and now it shows slightly lower than 1010. I think the long awaited development "trend" maybe begining. That being said, I still would be surprised to see tropical cyclone formation until Friday when the energy from the wave over the eastern Caribbean currently along 67W can be absorbed into this system, in my humble opinion.
One thing to remember with buoy observations is that buoys are stationary and the system is moving. A 24-hour relative pressure drop at a buoy doesn't mean the system is getting stronger, it just means it's getting closer.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145351
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?
What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?
What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22979
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re:
brunota2003 wrote:I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?
What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?
We weren't expecting it to come together until Friday. Today is Wednesday. It's consolidating very slowly. Come back Friday.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145351
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
Is the first time that 93L has the pressure down to 1009 mbs at Best Track.
AL, 93, 2010062400, , BEST, 0, 170N, 795W, 25, 1009 WV
ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest
AL, 93, 2010062400, , BEST, 0, 170N, 795W, 25, 1009 WV
ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- bvigal
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2276
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
- Contact:
Re:
Hurricane Andrew wrote:(Really off topic, but do you know the sympotoms of A Concussion? I just knocked the living daylight's out of myself when i was playing dodgeball. OK. I walked into a tree.)
sent you a PM!
0 likes
- WeatherLovingDoc
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:08 pm
- Location: Washington D.C.
Re:
brunota2003 wrote:I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?
What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?
A ha! A philosophic weather lover watcher! Got to love them.

0 likes
Re:
brunota2003 wrote:I don't get it...these waves have had near prime conditions (according to current standards) to develop, and then even intensify. Little dry air, hot SSTs, low shear, low pressures...heck, some even already had a low pressure on them! Yet they keep failing...why?
What criteria have we overlooked in the past that is clearly not there currently?
Shear isn't really that low at the moment though, its not huge shear but I suppose in a system that has had trouble with convergence that shear can be the difference between it forming or not IMO at least in the short term.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
I think we should all take wxmans advice and stop torturing ourselves and come back Friday 

0 likes
Michael
It's not like this thing is out of time. Most of the models don't show it getting to the Yucatan for 3 days or so at least, and in any case, June climatology strongly favors the area farther west. I think Friday's a good bet for the best chance of development, though we should have some trends visible tomorrow.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
wxman57 wrote:Surface obs across the disturbance do not indicate any LLC. Just ESE winds east of the wave axis and ENE winds west of the axis. I don't see any significant organization occurring yet. Probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.
Agree...just a low-level swirl at the moment.
0 likes
“If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.”
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
I tested out my generator just in case.
0 likes
“If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.”
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
- Location: walton county fla
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
Ivanhater wrote:I think we should all take wxmans advice and stop torturing ourselves and come back Friday
Now you know you're gonna be up at 2am for the next Euro run. Who you kiddin?

0 likes
GO SEMINOLES
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION
lonelymike wrote:Ivanhater wrote:I think we should all take wxmans advice and stop torturing ourselves and come back Friday
Now you know you're gonna be up at 2am for the next Euro run. Who you kiddin?
Lol, you know me too well

0 likes
Michael
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests