ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
15 good frames now, looks to be intensifying (though this storm has always been deceptive).
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=15
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=15
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- TeamPlayersBlue
- Category 5
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
- Location: Denver/Applewood, CO
TWC just said water is crossing Rd. 87 in Bolivar Peninsula. That poor island is SO flat. Especially after Ike
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
S. Padre Island just had a gust to 57 mph... sustained winds at 50 mph...
Amazing mesocyclone showing up on my GRLevel 3 that looks to head near or just south of SPadre Island in the next few minutes.
Edit: just gusted to 62 mph...
Amazing mesocyclone showing up on my GRLevel 3 that looks to head near or just south of SPadre Island in the next few minutes.
Edit: just gusted to 62 mph...
Last edited by wx247 on Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Not surprising SPI just had strong TS force wind given the band that is going through...band heading near due west so probably will go through Brownsville as well.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145334
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
Up to 85 mph.
SUMMARY OF 100 PM CDT...1800 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...24.4N 96.2W
ABOUT 110 MI...175 KM ENE OF LA PESCA MEXICO
ABOUT 130 MI...210 KM SSE OF BROWNSVILLE TEXAS
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...85 MPH...135 KM/HR
PRESENT MOVEMENT...NW OR 320 DEGREES AT 12 MPH...18 KM/HR
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...962 MB...28.41 INCHES
SUMMARY OF 100 PM CDT...1800 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...24.4N 96.2W
ABOUT 110 MI...175 KM ENE OF LA PESCA MEXICO
ABOUT 130 MI...210 KM SSE OF BROWNSVILLE TEXAS
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...85 MPH...135 KM/HR
PRESENT MOVEMENT...NW OR 320 DEGREES AT 12 MPH...18 KM/HR
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...962 MB...28.41 INCHES
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: Re:
Texas Snowman wrote:
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see some significant surge damage at SPI, maybe even a complete overwash of the city. Elevation there is only seven feet and storm surge will likely be in that neighborhood, maybe even a little higher.
Disclaimer: Above is unofficial, my opinion, and should not be used to make any decisions.
Well if they are at 7ft then I think yeah the surge probably will come rather close to washing through, esp if the system were to keep heading WNW/NW like it is presently.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
Alex moving more west now...won't hit Brownsville...surge i think my best guess is 5-7 feet into S. Padre.
Latest ECMWF moves it due west (not SW).
Latest ECMWF moves it due west (not SW).
0 likes
“If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.”
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
Since last recon vortex:
Distance between
N Latitude 23 32 0.00, W Longitude 95 12 0.00 (Point 1)
and N Latitude 24 16 0.00, W Longitude 96 2 0.00 (Point 2)
117.569 kilometers; 73.054 miles
Azimuth from point 1 to point 2 = 314.07°
Distance between
N Latitude 23 32 0.00, W Longitude 95 12 0.00 (Point 1)
and N Latitude 24 16 0.00, W Longitude 96 2 0.00 (Point 2)
117.569 kilometers; 73.054 miles
Azimuth from point 1 to point 2 = 314.07°
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
Wanted to save this image.


0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- Texas Snowman
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
- Location: Denison, Texas
Re: Re:
KWT wrote:Texas Snowman wrote:
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see some significant surge damage at SPI, maybe even a complete overwash of the city. Elevation there is only seven feet and storm surge will likely be in that neighborhood, maybe even a little higher.
Disclaimer: Above is unofficial, my opinion, and should not be used to make any decisions.
Well if they are at 7ft then I think yeah the surge probably will come rather close to washing through, esp if the system were to keep heading WNW/NW like it is presently.
Latest advisory from NHC has movement pegged at NW. That's not good for that area. And it looks like the current angle of approach is bringing a very long straight easterly fetch (to my untrained eye anyway) into the vicinity of the mouth of the Rio Grande.
0 likes
The above post and any post by Texas Snowman is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
HURAKAN wrote:Interesting note, Hurricane Alex is the strongest "A" storm since Hurricane Alex in 2004!!!
LOL
That was also the last time the year started off with a hurricane.
0 likes
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
tolakram wrote:Wanted to save this image.
So they haven't changed the cone of uncertainity, I find that interesting. Right now it would have to move almost due S in the near future to make landfall where they expect. With the weakness in the ridge to the North, what is going to keep it from moving due North????
0 likes
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
So I think there is a chance that this storm will definitely be a US landing Hurricane that is at least a Cat. 2 if not Cat. 3.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes
No I agree surge will likely be higher then 3-5ft, thinknig more like 6-8ft.
Looking more like WNW now on the radar, though recon suggests a NW motion is still occuring...
Looking more like WNW now on the radar, though recon suggests a NW motion is still occuring...
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
with the more northward movement, does that mean more rain/wind here in san antonio?
0 likes
- thetruesms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 844
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Tallahasee, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
forecast tracks aren't updated at intermediate advisoriesamericanre1 wrote:tolakram wrote:Wanted to save this image.
[img]http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/8384/ztemp.gif[img]
So they haven't changed the cone of uncertainity, I find that interesting. Right now it would have to move almost due S in the near future to make landfall where they expect. With the weakness in the ridge to the North, what is going to keep it from moving due North????
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests