ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- HurricaneStriker
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:23 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: Re:
WxGuy1 wrote:ozonepete wrote:HurricaneStriker wrote:When I saw that pic, I couldn't believe this was still a Category 1.
It can't be a cat 1. There's no way. Just hope recon gets some good readings before it starts to weaken.
Wow!
It has been near Cat 2 for a few hours now, and it's probably at the Cat 1/2 border now. Whether it gains a few more kts to bump it up to Cat 2 is rather trivial, IMO, in the grand scheme of things. The difference in the damage potential between a 100 mph Cat 2 and a 95 mph Cat 1 isn't terribly significant. Sure, it's a pain since someone down the road might compare Alex to a 75 mph tiny hurricane, but that's why one should look at central pressure and max wind speed at land fall instead of just SS category.
Despite its appearance and low minimum central pressure, it's "only" a Cat 1 or weak Cat 2 right now largely because it has a huge wind field for a low-end hurricane. Heck, the hurricane force winds extend outward up to 70 miles from the center, and the tropical storm force winds extend up to 205 mi. That's a very large wind field for a strong Cat 1 or weak Cat 2. Such a large field of TS and Cat1 force winds requires that one have an anomalously low central pressure, otherwise you wouldn't be able to maintain the pressure gradient required for such a wind field. Wind speeds in such systems (well, at least in the mesoscale and larger) are proportional to the pressure gradient, or the change in pressure over some distance. So, if the distance is large (dr is big), and you maintain a TS/Cat1 strength pressure gradient (dp/dr), then the total change in pressure from the center to the background state (that is, dp) must be quite large.
Thanks, WxGuy1. For that exact reason, we can see why it's ramping up now - the wind field has contracted during the day today while the pressure has dropped even further. Wind's would have to increase due to the basic physics.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
drezee wrote:77kt SFMR...in SE quad
That 77 was flagged though.
0 likes
- Bocadude85
- Category 5
- Posts: 2991
- Age: 38
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Honolulu,Hi
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
Looking at the Brownsville radar it appears Ales has slowed a little
0 likes
- HurricaneStriker
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:23 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re:
KWT wrote:98kts from recon in I believe the NW eyewall...to be honest thats high enough probably for the NHC to upgrade given it wouldn't take much for there to be another 5-6kts in the NE eyewall...and the pressure is super low now at 952mbs, sure is after Audrey isn't it.
Does look like its slowed down somewhat again. Eye really is looking a little rain filled now.
I agree with you that 98kts (Category 3) and 952mb could be the sign that the NHC could upgrade it. Seems like its trying to buy itself more time again!

0 likes
217 Miles from the Texas Shore
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
CrazyC83 wrote:drezee wrote:77kt SFMR...in SE quad
That 77 was flagged though.
True, there was a 101 that was flagged earlier as well...
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: Re:
HurricaneStriker wrote:KWT wrote:98kts from recon in I believe the NW eyewall...to be honest thats high enough probably for the NHC to upgrade given it wouldn't take much for there to be another 5-6kts in the NE eyewall...and the pressure is super low now at 952mbs, sure is after Audrey isn't it.
Does look like its slowed down somewhat again. Eye really is looking a little rain filled now.
I agree with you that 98kts (Category 3) and 952mb could be the sign that the NHC could upgrade it. Seems like its trying to buy itself more time again!
That 98 kt at 850mb equates to about 78 kt at the surface.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
- Location: Pensacola, Florida
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: Re:
HurricaneStriker wrote:KWT wrote:98kts from recon in I believe the NW eyewall...to be honest thats high enough probably for the NHC to upgrade given it wouldn't take much for there to be another 5-6kts in the NE eyewall...and the pressure is super low now at 952mbs, sure is after Audrey isn't it.
Does look like its slowed down somewhat again. Eye really is looking a little rain filled now.
I agree with you that 98kts (Category 3) and 952mb could be the sign that the NHC could upgrade it. Seems like its trying to buy itself more time again!
Sometimes it seems as if these hurricanes are alive with personality.
0 likes
Looks like recon is going through the NE quadrant to try and find those category-2 winds...I can't imagine they will have too many passes more they can take though now?
Fair play to the crew on that plane, they are doing everything they can to get those category-2 winds.
Fair play to the crew on that plane, they are doing everything they can to get those category-2 winds.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
This is a hurricane in June...this is what we can look "forward" to for this season






0 likes
Michael
- HurricaneStriker
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:23 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- HurricaneStriker
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:23 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION
Ivanhater wrote:This is a hurricane in June...this is what we can look "forward" to for this season
All I can say is wow. These pictures are shocking. The first to me looks like a Category 5!
0 likes
217 Miles from the Texas Shore
Yep it sure is HS, radar shows it quite nicely, it really did deepen rapidly again though after that quick EWRC it went through.
Ivanhater, I tell ya what if someone put up that image and asked me to call the strength of the storm, I'd have gone with a borderline 3/4 rather then a 1/2!!!
Ivanhater, I tell ya what if someone put up that image and asked me to call the strength of the storm, I'd have gone with a borderline 3/4 rather then a 1/2!!!
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
- Location: Pensacola, Florida
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
SunnyThoughts wrote:I don't think ANYONE would have believed it had anyone suggested we would see a 950mb cat 1 hurricane lol
The lowest pressure I can think of in an over-water Cat 1 was with Gloria in 1985, I believe it was 946mb at one point with winds of 80 kt.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest