ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#421 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:18 pm

Lots of folks throwing in the towel on 96L even before it makes it into the GOM. I say it's way too early to call right now. IMO
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#422 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:22 pm

Yeah I can see a sheared system out of this, whether or not it makes it to TS status is another matter of course but we shall see. Models quite keen on most of Texas getting a rather rainy day regardless of development.

Worth watching that MLC though, esp with the best Vorticity relocating itself somewhat closer to the MLC.

edit---also just had a look at the shear aloft, looks like there maybe a developing upper high just to the north of that MLC so conditions aloft may not actually be that bad for the system once in the Gulf...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#423 Postby MGC » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:26 pm

Yea, that MLC might work its way down to the surface once it hits the water....gotta keep an eye on it. If it does spin up it looks to be a N Mexico or S Texas event....MGC
0 likes   

N2Storms
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: Panama City, Florida

Re:

#424 Postby N2Storms » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:26 pm

[quote="Stormcenter"]Lots of folks throwing in the towel on 96L even before it makes it into the GOM. I say it's way too early to call right now. IMO[/quote]



I agree...while I don't think it will match Alex I think it will become Bonnie and ulitimately move inland somewhere along the Central Texas coast...I can see Hou/Gal and SW La getting lots and lots of precip
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#425 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:35 pm

When even the Canadian isn't making you a Cat 5 you know your meant just to be an Invest evidently!
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#426 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:39 pm

tolakram wrote:High speed visible loop. 30 frames, speed it up to get a good idea of the motion.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=30

It really doesn't look all that bad, and i see numerous hints at a LLC starting to form.


I have to say that it appears to me a possible LLC is trying to form NW of the Yucatan Peninsula. Of course my eyes are not as trained as our pro mets and I don't have access to some of the information they have so I bow to them when they say there is no LLC. Even if there is one trying to form this system has a long way to go to be anything besides a major rainmaker wherever it ends up "landfalling" by the end of the week. Even though the models have moved South with this, wxman57 has pointed out the reason that may be happening. We really don't need the kind of rain this may produce anywhere along the TX Coast or for that matter LA either. And unfortunately the winds around this(and previously Alex) have now started to bring small amounts of the oil from the Horizon disaster to the beaches of SE TX.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#427 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:42 pm

I think we are in a Lull right now...The busy potential we experienced over the weekend was obviously just a head fake (we went from 4 potential areas to almost no areas aside from 96L) within a couple of days.

Wait until August.... :wink:
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#428 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:47 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:I think we are in a Lull right now...The busy potential we experienced over the weekend was obviously just a head fake (we went from 4 potential areas to almost no areas aside from 96L) within a couple of days.

Wait until August.... :wink:


I guess they were bored that night? Two of them ended up POOF, and one had great potential but made landfall (maybe still was a storm though?)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#429 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:49 pm

The MLC is clear to see now over the NW Yucatan. But surface obs don't indicate anything of significance yet. Satellite loops can be very deceiving when trying to identify an LLC. That's why I combine satellite with surface obs.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#430 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:53 pm

vbhoutex, I just had a look at that loop and it does rather look like there is some low level clouds that are heading southwards off the NW Yucatan and that may well be a sign that there is some sort of low level turning trying to develop, and its right over where the ULH is right now and the MLC isn't far off either.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#431 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:53 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html

Iv'e been looking at this Vis loop all day and that vigorous MLC on the Yucatan continue's to move NW towards the weak Low Level Swirl to the NW in the Gulf. Again, I'm thinking this is trying to "stack" and we have lift off if convection starts to fire. Tonight is critical IMO.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#432 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:06 pm

Convection starting to develop as the sun goes down over the MLC. That feature will probably be over water again in about 6hrs, good job as it seems like its starting to elongate again.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re:

#433 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:09 pm

KWT wrote:Convection starting to develop as the sun goes down over the MLC. That feature will probably be over water again in about 6hrs, good job as it seems like its starting to elongate again.


Elongate towards the phantom LL swirl? and I say phantom because nothing supports a low level circualtion besides satellite appearance.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#434 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:26 pm

Code: Select all

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



Tonight will be interesting to watch if indeed what we are seeing off the NW Yucatan is an attempt at low level turning. That MLC is almost too obvious which I would think means it has some energy with it, especially since it was "hiding" last night and is still intact. If it does catch up to our "phantom" we will find out if something is really trying to get going.
Also I am not buying the models taking this system into N MX or S TX. I think the reason for the shift south is that they are seeing the ULL that is quickly retrograding NW out of the way as a weakness and not taking what was 95L into consideration. IMO, between that and ex-95L I think whatever 96L becomes is at a minimum a Central TX coast landfall if not further up the coast. This is not -removed-. It is observations of what I see going on in the atmosphere. The last thing we need right now is any more heavy tropical downpours! Light to moderate rains would be ok if they don't last too long.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

xcool22

#435 Postby xcool22 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:32 pm

surface low in the Gulf is blowing up hmmmm
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#436 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:38 pm

xcool22 wrote:surface low in the Gulf is blowing up hmmmm


That would be an incorrect statement.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#437 Postby BigA » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:39 pm

There's a developing upper level high just to the north of the mid level circulation. This is probably a plus factor for development.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
.
Last edited by BigA on Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

xcool22

#438 Postby xcool22 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:42 pm

thanks .that why i hmmm
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#439 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:43 pm

The TUTT could also help ventilate the system...
0 likes   

xcool22

#440 Postby xcool22 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:44 pm

sorry i was wrong
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest